Extending Private-Collective Innovation: A Case Study

The private-collective innovation model proposes incentives for individuals and firms to privately invest resources to create public goods innovations. Such innovations are characterized by non-rivalry and non-exclusivity in consumption. Examples include open source software, user-generated media products, drug formulas, and sport equipment designs. There is still limited empirical research on private-collective innovation. We present a case study to (1) provide empirical evidence of a case of private-collective innovation, showing specific benefits, and (2) to extend the private-collective innovation model by analyzing the hidden costs for the company involved. We examine the development of the Nokia Internet Tablet, which builds on both proprietary and open source software development, and that involves both Nokia developers and volunteers who are not employed by the company. Seven benefits for Nokia are identified, as are five hidden costs: difficulty to differentiate, guarding business secrets, reducing community entry barriers, giving up control, and organizational inertia. We examine the actions taken by the management to mitigate these costs throughout the development period.

[1]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Knowledge Management Systems: Issues, Challenges, and Benefits , 1999, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[2]  R. Allen,et al.  Collective Invention , 1982 .

[3]  Nicolaj Siggelkow.  Persuasion with case studies , 2007 .

[4]  Benno Luthiger Stoll.  Spass und Software-Entwicklung: zur Motivation von Open-Source-Programmierern , 2006 .

[5]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[6]  Udo Zander,et al.  The Inside Track: On the Important (But Neglected) Role of Customers in the Resource - Based View of Strategy and Firm Growth , 2005 .

[7]  N. Economides.  The Economics of Networks , 1995 .

[8]  D. Harhoff,et al.  Profiting from Voluntary Information Spillovers: How Users Benefit by Freely Revealing Their Innovations , 2003 .

[9]  Kevin G. Corley,et al.  Building Better Theory by Bridging the Quantitative-Qualitative Divide , 2006 .

[10]  J. Henkel.  Selective revealing in open innovation processes: the case of embedded Linux (gekürzte Version) , 2006 .

[11]  Sebastian Spaeth,et al.  Code Reuse in Open Source Software , 2008, Manag. Sci..

[12]  K. Arrow.  The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing , 1962 .

[13]  Jesper B. Sørensen,et al.  Aging, Obsolescence, and Organizational Innovation , 2000 .

[14]  G. Krogh,et al.  Private-Collective Innovation and the Fragility of Knowledge Sharing , 2006 .

[15]  Sandra Slaughter,et al.  Understanding the Motivations, Participation, and Performance of Open Source Software Developers: A Longitudinal Study of the Apache Projects , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[16]  Ivar Jacobson,et al.  The Unified Software Development Process , 1999 .

[17]  M. Narasimham,et al.  The economics of knowledge , 2003, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Manag..

[18]  Ronald Maier,et al.  Knowledge Management Systems , 2010 .

[19]  S. Kotha.  Mass customization: Implementing the emerging paradigm for competitive advantage , 1995 .

[20]  J. Tirole,et al.  Some Simple Economics of Open Source , 2002 .

[21]  C. Crawford.  The Hidden Costs of Accelerated Product Development , 1992 .

[22]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  The Art of Continuous Change : Linking Complexity Theory and Time-Paced Evolution in Relentlessly Shifting Organizations , 1997 .

[23]  Alessandro Nuvolari,et al.  Collective invention during the British , 2004 .

[24]  George Kuk,et al.  Strategic Interaction and Knowledge Sharing in the KDE Developer Mailing List , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[25]  P. Muller,et al.  Why do firms disclose knowledge and how does it matter? , 2006 .

[26]  Kenneth W. Dam.  Some Economic Considerations in the Intellectual Property Protection of Software , 1995, The Journal of Legal Studies.

[27]  O. Granstrand.  The Economics and Management of Intellectual Property , 1999 .

[28]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[29]  Larry Downes,et al.  Unleashing the Killer App: Digital Strategies for Market Dominance , 1998 .

[30]  Douglas D. Heckathorn,et al.  Respondent-driven sampling : A new approach to the study of hidden populations , 1997 .

[31]  Sonali K. Shah.  Motivation, Governance, and the Viability of Hybrid Forms in Open Source Software Development , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[32]  A. Pettigrew.  Longitudinal Field Research on Change: Theory and Practice , 1990 .

[33]  Preston G. Smith,et al.  Accelerated Product Development: Techniques and Traps , 2007 .

[34]  Alfonso Gambardella,et al.  Proprietary vs. Public Domain Licensing of Software and Research Products , 2005 .

[35]  B. Heinrich.  Just for fun? , 2005, Nature.

[36]  S. Gächter,et al.  Initiating private-collective innovation: The fragility of knowledge sharing , 2010 .

[37]  Margit Osterloh,et al.  Trust and Community in Open Source Software Production , 2004 .

[38]  Eric H. Kessler,et al.  Internal Vs. External Learning In New Product Development: Effects On Speed, Costs And Competitive Advantage , 2000 .

[39]  W. Swap,et al.  Resource allocation beyond firm boundaries: A multi-level model for Open Source innovation , 2004 .

[40]  Stefano Zambelli.  The 40% Neoclassical Aggregate Theory of Production , 2001 .

[41]  J. Liebeskind,et al.  Knowledge, Strategy, and the Theory of the Firm , 1996 .

[42]  E. Hippel,et al.  Free revealing and the private-collective model for innovation incentives , 2006 .

[43]  J. Stiglitz.  Scrooge and intellectual property rights , 2006, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[44]  Nicholas Economides,et al.  Two-Sided Competition of Proprietary vs. Open Source Technology Platforms and the Implications for the Software Industry , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[45]  K. Pavitt,et al.  Knowledge Specialization, Organizational Coupling, and the Boundaries of the Firm: Why Do Firms Know More than They Make? , 2001 .

[46]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[47]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  The Architecture of Participation: Does Code Architecture Mitigate Free Riding in the Open Source Development Model? , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[48]  Lars Frederiksen,et al.  Why Do Users Contribute to Firm-Hosted User Communities? The Case of Computer-Controlled Music Instruments , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[49]  N. Hoffart.  Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory , 2000 .

[50]  P. David.  Knowledge, Property, and the System Dynamics of Technological Change , 1992 .

[51]  Georg von Krogh,et al.  Open Source Software and the "Private-Collective" Innovation Model: Issues for Organization Science , 2003, Organ. Sci..