Efficiency and shrinking in evolving networks

Characterizing the spatio-temporal evolution of networks is a central topic in many disciplines. While network expansion has been studied thoroughly, less is known about how empirical networks behave when shrinking. For transportation networks, this is especially relevant on account of their connection with the socio-economical substrate, and we focus here on the evolution of the French railway network from its birth in 1840 to 2000, in relation to the country’s demographic dynamics. The network evolved in parallel with technology (e.g. faster trains) and under strong constraints, such as preserving a good population coverage and balancing cost and efficiency. We show that the shrinking phase that started in 1930 decreased the total length of the network while preserving efficiency and population coverage: efficiency and robustness remained remarkably constant while the total length of the network shrank by 50% between 1930 and 2000, and the total travel time and time-diameter decreased by more than 75% during the same period. Moreover, shrinking the network did not affect the overall accessibility with an average travel time that decreases steadily since its formation. This evolution leads naturally to an increase in transportation multimodality (such as a massive use of cars) and shows the importance of considering together transportation modes acting at different spatial scales. More generally, our results suggest that shrinking is not necessarily associated with a decay in performance and functions but can be beneficial in terms of design goals and can be part of the natural evolution of an adaptive network.

[1]  O. Sporns,et al.  The economy of brain network organization , 2012, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[2]  V. Latora,et al.  Complex Networks: Principles, Methods and Applications , 2017 .

[3]  T. Thevenin,et al.  Measuring one century of railway accessibility and population change in France. A historical GIS approach , 2016 .

[4]  Toshiyuki Nakagaki,et al.  Structure and formation of ant transportation networks , 2011, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[5]  Luca Bertolini,et al.  Evolutionary Urban Transportation Planning: An Exploration , 2007 .

[6]  A Ford,et al.  Spatial structure and evolution of infrastructure networks , 2016 .

[7]  John Clark,et al.  A First Look at Graph Theory , 1991 .

[8]  Bert van Wee,et al.  Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: review and research directions , 2004 .

[9]  Rémi Louf,et al.  Balancing building and maintenance costs in growing transport networks. , 2016, Physical review. E.

[10]  Toshiyuki Nakagaki,et al.  Current-reinforced random walks for constructing transport networks , 2013, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[11]  V. Latora,et al.  Structural properties of planar graphs of urban street patterns. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[12]  V Latora,et al.  Efficient behavior of small-world networks. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[13]  Gourab Ghoshal,et al.  Exact solutions for models of evolving networks with addition and deletion of nodes. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[14]  D. Sumpter,et al.  Local cost minimization in ant transport networks: from small-scale data to large-scale trade-offs , 2015, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[15]  Alessandro Vespignani,et al.  Dynamical Processes on Complex Networks , 2008 .

[16]  Ronald L. Graham,et al.  On the History of the Minimum Spanning Tree Problem , 1985, Annals of the History of Computing.

[17]  Michael T. Gastner,et al.  Optimal design of spatial distribution networks. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[18]  J. Bouchaud Crises and Collective Socio-Economic Phenomena: Simple Models and Challenges , 2012, 1209.0453.

[19]  Pablo Jensen,et al.  Competition between collective and individual dynamics , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  Debbie A. Niemeier,et al.  Measuring Accessibility: An Exploration of Issues and Alternatives , 1997 .

[21]  Daniel W. Franks,et al.  Efficiency and robustness of ant colony transportation networks , 2013, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[22]  David M Levinson,et al.  Evolving Transportation Networks , 2011 .

[23]  V. Latora,et al.  A measure of centrality based on network efficiency , 2004, cond-mat/0402050.

[24]  M. Fricker,et al.  Biological solutions to transport network design , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[25]  D. Aldous,et al.  Connected Spatial Networks over Random Points and a Route-Length Statistic , 2010, 1003.3700.

[26]  A. Tero,et al.  Rules for Biologically Inspired Adaptive Network Design , 2010, Science.

[27]  Marc Barthelemy,et al.  Morphogenesis of Spatial Networks , 2017 .

[28]  David J. T. Sumpter,et al.  Individual Rules for Trail Pattern Formation in Argentine Ants (Linepithema humile) , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[29]  Thomas Thévenin,et al.  Revisiting the structuring effect of transportation infrastructure: An empirical approach with the French railway network from 1860 to 1910 , 2018 .

[30]  Albert Díaz-Guilera,et al.  Comparing spatial networks: A 'one size fits all' efficiency-driven approach , 2018, Physical review. E.