Search for identical octapeptides in unrelated proteins: Structural plasticity revisited.

Since proteins are dynamic in nature, they can alter their local structure in response to changes in their environment factors such as temperature, pH, phosphorylation, and binding of other small molecules. These conformational changes are extremely important for the correct folding and functioning of proteins. There are also a number of diseases associated with protein conformational change such as amyloid diseases. To stimulate research into the above factors which specify one conformation over another, different theoretical models have been proposed and tested against sequence similar distant structure protein fragments. In order to simplify the computational complexity of identifying conformational changes in proteins, various local sequence search algorithms were employed and the structural plasticity in unrelated proteins was examined by various research groups. In the present work, we revisit the mechanism of structural plasticity in unrelated proteins with increased number of structures in Protein Data Bank by comparing identical octapeptides in unrelated proteins with dictionary of protein secondary structure extracted from existing experimental data. Our goal is to bring out the influence of hydrophobic residues, hydrophilic residues, flanking residues, difference in secondary structural propensities of surrounding residues, difference in phi-psi angles and local and nonlocal interactions in identical octapeptides adopting different conformations. Also we have used surrounding hydrophobicity, environment dependent interaction energy, atomic mean force potential, structural unit contacts and difference profiles models to explore the factors which cause structural plasticity. The results discussed here may provide insights into protein folding, design and function.

[1]  P. Romero,et al.  Sequence complexity of disordered protein , 2001, Proteins.

[2]  R. Lerner,et al.  Identical short peptide sequences in unrelated proteins can have different conformations: a testing ground for theories of immune recognition. , 1985, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  C Sander,et al.  On the use of sequence homologies to predict protein structure: identical pentapeptides can have completely different conformations. , 1984, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  B. Laubert,et al.  Structural analysis of a set of proteins resulting from a bacterial genomics project , 2005, Proteins.

[5]  P. S. Kim,et al.  Context-dependent secondary structure formation of a designed protein sequence , 1996, Nature.

[6]  L. Iakoucheva,et al.  Intrinsic Disorder and Protein Function , 2002 .

[7]  S. Dalal,et al.  Understanding the sequence determinants of conformational switching using protein design , 2000, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[8]  M. Mutter,et al.  Peptides as Conformational Switch: Medium‐Induced Conformational Transitions of Designed Peptides , 1990 .

[9]  R. Casadio,et al.  Predictions of protein segments with the same aminoacid sequence and different secondary structure: A benchmark for predictive methods , 2000, Proteins.

[10]  A. Fersht,et al.  Is there a unifying mechanism for protein folding? , 2003, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[11]  P Argos,et al.  Analysis of sequence-similar pentapeptides in unrelated protein tertiary structures. Strategies for protein folding and a guide for site-directed mutagenesis. , 1987, Journal of molecular biology.

[12]  Malin M. Young,et al.  Predicting conformational switches in proteins , 1999, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[13]  J. Garnier,et al.  Analysis of the accuracy and implications of simple methods for predicting the secondary structure of globular proteins. , 1978, Journal of molecular biology.

[14]  Burkhard Rost,et al.  DSSPcont: continuous secondary structure assignments for proteins , 2003, Nucleic Acids Res..

[15]  Anne Poupon,et al.  Predicting the protein folding nucleus from a sequence , 1999, FEBS letters.

[16]  P. Y. Chou,et al.  Prediction of the secondary structure of proteins from their amino acid sequence. , 2006 .

[17]  M. Mutter,et al.  Under the influence of phi and psi , 2005, Journal of peptide science : an official publication of the European Peptide Society.

[18]  C. Tanford Contribution of Hydrophobic Interactions to the Stability of the Globular Conformation of Proteins , 1962 .

[19]  M Michael Gromiha,et al.  Inter-residue interactions in protein folding and stability. , 2004, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[20]  P. Ponnuswamy,et al.  Properties of nucleation sites in globular proteins. , 1980, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[21]  Konda Mani Saravanan,et al.  Sequence and structural analysis of two designed proteins with 88% identity adopting different folds. , 2010, Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS.

[22]  K. Wilson,et al.  Stabilization of the Spectrin-Like Domains of Nesprin-1α by the Evolutionarily Conserved “Adaptive” Domain , 2010, Cellular and molecular bioengineering.

[23]  S Rackovsky,et al.  On the properties and sequence context of structurally ambivalent fragments in proteins , 2003, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[24]  Arno Formella,et al.  Superimposé: a 3D structural superposition server , 2008, Nucleic Acids Res..

[25]  G. Rose,et al.  Is protein folding hierarchic? II. Folding intermediates and transition states. , 1999, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[26]  John Orban,et al.  NMR structures of two designed proteins with high sequence identity but different fold and function , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  H. Dyson,et al.  Intrinsically unstructured proteins: re-assessing the protein structure-function paradigm. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[28]  Michal Sharon,et al.  Molecular switch for alternative conformations of the HIV-1 V3 region: Implications for phenotype conversion , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  B. Kuhlman,et al.  A conformational transition state accompanies tryptophan activation by B. stearothermophilus tryptophanyl-tRNA synthetase. , 2007, Structure.

[30]  Kengo Kinoshita,et al.  Effects of surface‐to‐volume ratio of proteins on hydrophilic residues: Decrease in occurrence and increase in buried fraction , 2008, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[31]  S H Kim,et al.  Environment-dependent residue contact energies for proteins. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  Neil Hunter,et al.  Structure of N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase (GcnA) from the endocarditis pathogen Streptococcus gordonii and its complex with the mechanism-based inhibitor NAG-thiazoline. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[33]  M. Michael Gromiha,et al.  Role of Hydrophobic Clusters and Long-Range Contact Networks in the Folding of (α/β)8 Barrel Proteins , 2003 .

[34]  Konda Mani Saravanan,et al.  Analysis and Visualization of Long-Range Contacts and Networks in Homologous Families of Proteins , 2009 .

[35]  A A Szalay,et al.  Prediction of homology and divergence in the secondary structure of polypeptides. , 1985, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  S. Sudarsanam,et al.  Structural diversity of sequentially identical subsequences of proteins: Identical octapeptides can have different conformations , 1998, Proteins.

[37]  T. N. Palmer The maltase, glucoamylase and transglucosylase activities of acid -glucosidase from rabbit muscle. , 1971, The Biochemical journal.

[38]  M. Michael Gromiha,et al.  Influence of Medium and Long Range Interactions in Different Structural Classes of Globular Proteins , 1997, Journal of biological physics.

[39]  Jung-Ying Wang,et al.  Look‐up tables for protein solvent accessibility prediction and nearest neighbor effect analysis , 2004, Biopolymers.

[40]  Scott R. Presnell,et al.  Origins of structural diversity within sequentially identical hexapeptides , 1993, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[41]  F. Jacob,et al.  Evolution and tinkering. , 1977, Science.

[42]  M. Sippl Calculation of conformational ensembles from potentials of mean force. An approach to the knowledge-based prediction of local structures in globular proteins. , 1990, Journal of molecular biology.

[43]  F. Melo,et al.  Novel knowledge-based mean force potential at atomic level. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[44]  K. Dill,et al.  An iterative method for extracting energy-like quantities from protein structures. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[45]  H. Scheraga,et al.  The influence of long-range interactions on the structure of myoglobin. , 1968, Biochemistry.

[46]  P. Ponnuswamy,et al.  Hydrophobic character of amino acid residues in globular proteins , 1978, Nature.

[47]  Haruki Nakamura,et al.  Remediation of the protein data bank archive , 2007, Nucleic Acids Res..