Time lapse investigation of antibiotic susceptibility using a microfluidic linear gradient 3D culture device.

This study reports a novel approach to quantitatively investigate the antibacterial effect of antibiotics on bacteria using a three-dimensional microfluidic culture device. In particular, our approach is suitable for studying the pharmacodynamics effects of antibiotics on bacterial cells temporally and with a continuous range of concentrations in a single experiment. The responses of bacterial cells to a linear concentration gradient of antibiotics were observed using time-lapse photography, by encapsulating bacterial cells in an agarose-based gel located in a commercially available microfluidics chamber. This approach generates dynamic information with high resolution, in a single operation, e.g., growth curves and antibiotic pharmacodynamics, in a well-controlled environment. No pre-labelling of the cells is needed and therefore any bacterial sample can be tested in this setup. It also provides static information comparable to that of standard techniques for measuring minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). Five antibiotics with different mechanisms were analysed against wild-type Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus and Salmonella Typhimurium. The entire process, including data analysis, took 2.5-4 h and from the same analysis, high-resolution growth curves were obtained. As a proof of principle, a pharmacodynamic model of streptomycin against Salmonella Typhimurium was built based on the maximal effect model, which agreed well with the experimental results. Our approach has the potential to be a simple and flexible solution to study responding behaviours of microbial cells under different selection pressures both temporally and in a range of concentrations.

[1]  M. Burns,et al.  Asynchronous magnetic bead rotation (AMBR) biosensor in microfluidic droplets for rapid bacterial growth and susceptibility measurements. , 2011, Lab on a chip.

[2]  R. Bulger,et al.  Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy , 1969, Nature.

[3]  R. Ismagilov,et al.  Detecting bacteria and determining their susceptibility to antibiotics by stochastic confinement in nanoliter droplets using plug-based microfluidics. , 2008, Lab on a chip.

[4]  V. Gant,et al.  The application of flow cytometry to the study of bacterial responses to antibiotics. , 1993, Journal of medical microbiology.

[5]  Varun Garg,et al.  Comparison of four basic models of indirect pharmacodynamic responses , 1993, Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics.

[6]  J H HUMPHREY,et al.  A general theory for plate assay of antibiotics with some practical applications. , 1952, Journal of general microbiology.

[7]  W. Derbyshire,et al.  N.m.r. of agarose gels , 1974 .

[8]  J. Cooper,et al.  Gradient Microfluidics Enables Rapid Bacterial Growth Inhibition Testing , 2014, Analytical chemistry.

[9]  Nate J. Cira,et al.  A self-loading microfluidic device for determining the minimum inhibitory concentration of antibiotics. , 2012, Lab on a chip.

[10]  Soo Hyeon Kim,et al.  A single-cell drug efflux assay in bacteria by using a directly accessible femtoliter droplet array. , 2012, Lab on a chip.

[11]  G. Doern,et al.  Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing , 2011, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[12]  R. Reski,et al.  β-Lactam antibiotics inhibit chloroplast division in a moss (Physcomitrella patens) but not in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) , 1997 .

[13]  H. Steen,et al.  Rapid flow cytometric assessment of mecillinam and ampicillin bacterial susceptibility. , 1996, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[14]  Vincent Gau,et al.  Antimicrobial susceptibility testing using high surface-to-volume ratio microchannels. , 2010, Analytical chemistry.

[15]  H. Neu,et al.  The Crisis in Antibiotic Resistance , 1992, Science.

[16]  Sunghoon Kwon,et al.  Rapid antibiotic susceptibility testing by tracking single cell growth in a microfluidic agarose channel system. , 2013, Lab on a chip.

[17]  L. Joyce,et al.  Comparison of five methods, including the PDM Epsilometer test (E test), for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa , 1992, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[18]  Zhigang Wu,et al.  Soft inertial microfluidics for high throughput separation of bacteria from human blood cells. , 2009, Lab on a chip.

[19]  M. Ferraro,et al.  Antimicrobial susceptibility testing: a review of general principles and contemporary practices. , 2009, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[20]  D. Savage Microbial ecology of the gastrointestinal tract. , 1977, Annual review of microbiology.

[21]  J. Strominger,et al.  Glycopeptide transpeptidase and D-alanine carboxypeptidase: penicillin-sensitive enzymatic reactions. , 1966, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  Andre Sharon,et al.  A microfluidic platform for rapid, stress-induced antibiotic susceptibility testing of Staphylococcus aureus. , 2012, Lab on a chip.

[23]  I. Peitz,et al.  Single-cell bacteria growth monitoring by automated DEP-facilitated image analysis. , 2010, Lab on a chip.

[24]  D. Andersson,et al.  Persistence of antibiotic resistant bacteria. , 2003, Current opinion in microbiology.

[25]  J. Andrews,et al.  Determination of minimum inhibitory concentrations. , 2001, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[26]  K. Jensen,et al.  Cells on chips , 2006, Nature.

[27]  Jong Hwan Sung,et al.  A microfluidic device for a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) model on a chip. , 2010, Lab on a chip.

[28]  Mats O. Karlsson,et al.  Semimechanistic Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Model for Assessment of Activity of Antibacterial Agents from Time-Kill Curve Experiments , 2006, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[29]  Yun-Gon Kim,et al.  In situ monitoring of antibiotic susceptibility of bacterial biofilms in a microfluidic device. , 2010, Lab on a chip.

[30]  B. Levin,et al.  Population Dynamics of Antibiotic Treatment: a Mathematical Model and Hypotheses for Time-Kill and Continuous-Culture Experiments , 2010, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[31]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[32]  J. Wang,et al.  Theory of the Self-diffusion of Water in Protein Solutions. A New Method for Studying the Hydration and Shape of Protein Molecules , 1954 .

[33]  D. Weibel,et al.  Rapid screening of antibiotic toxicity in an automated microdroplet system. , 2012, Lab on a chip.

[34]  Glyn O. Phillips,et al.  Handbook of hydrocolloids. , 2009 .

[35]  T. Malinin,et al.  The effect of some beta-lactam antibiotics on Escherichia coli studied by flow cytometry. , 1982, Cytometry.

[36]  George L. Drusano,et al.  Antimicrobial pharmacodynamics: critical interactions of 'bug and drug' , 2004, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[37]  O. Cars,et al.  In Vitro Studies of Pharmacodynamic Properties of Vancomycin against Staphylococcus aureus andStaphylococcus epidermidis , 1998, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.