Psychometric validation of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale

Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the factor structure and psychometric properties of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale (CRBS). Design, setting, and participants: In total, 2636 cardiac inpatients from 11 hospitals completed a survey. One year later, participants completed a follow-up survey, which included the CRBS. A subsample of patients also completed a third survey which included the CRBS, the Cardiac Rehabilitation Enrolment Obstacles scale, and the Beliefs About Cardiac Rehabilitation scale three weeks later. The CRBS asked participants to rate 21 cardiac rehabilitation barriers on a five-point Likert scale regardless of cardiac rehabilitation referral or enrolment. Results: Maximum likelihood factor analysis with oblique rotation resulted in a four-factor solution: perceived need/healthcare factors (eigenvalue = 6.13, Cronbach’s α = .89), logistical factors (eigenvalue = 5.83, Cronbach’s α = .88), work/time conflicts (eigenvalue = 3.78, Cronbach’s α = .71), and comorbidities/functional status (eigenvalue = 4.85, Cronbach’s α = .83). Mean total perceived barriers were significantly greater among non-enrollees than cardiac rehabilitation enrollees (P < .001). Convergent validity with the Beliefs About Cardiac Rehabilitation and Cardiac Rehabilitation Enrolment Obstacles scales was also demonstrated. Test-retest reliability of the CRBS was acceptable (intraclass correlation coefficient = .64). Conclusion: The CRBS consists of four subscales and has sound psychometric properties. The extent to which identified barriers can be addressed to facilitate greater cardiac rehabilitation utilization warrants future study.

[1]  D. Stewart,et al.  Barriers to Cardiac Rehabilitation: DOES AGE MAKE A DIFFERENCE? , 2009, Journal of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation and prevention.

[2]  D. Stewart,et al.  A multisite examination of sex differences in cardiac rehabilitation barriers by participation status. , 2009, Journal of women's health.

[3]  J. Graham,et al.  Missing data analysis: making it work in the real world. , 2009, Annual review of psychology.

[4]  L. Scott Referral to outpatient cardiac rehabilitation: intervention research at the patient, provider, and health system levels , 2008, Nature Clinical Practice Cardiovascular Medicine.

[5]  P. Davidson,et al.  Development and Preliminary Testing of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Enrolment Obstacles (CREO) Scale: Implications for Service Development , 2008, European journal of cardiovascular nursing : journal of the Working Group on Cardiovascular Nursing of the European Society of Cardiology.

[6]  P. Davidson,et al.  Validation of the Revised Cardiac Rehabilitation Preference Form in Patients With Post–Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , 2007, Journal of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation and prevention.

[7]  Sharon-Lise T Normand,et al.  Use of Cardiac Rehabilitation by Medicare Beneficiaries After Myocardial Infarction or Coronary Bypass Surgery , 2007, Circulation.

[8]  G. Jackson,et al.  Assessing patients’ beliefs about cardiac rehabilitation as a basis for predicting attendance after acute myocardial infarction , 2006, Heart.

[9]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using multivariate statistics, 5th ed. , 2007 .

[10]  D. Brooks,et al.  Referral to and discharge from cardiac rehabilitation: key informant views on continuity of care. , 2006, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[11]  Mary A. Dolansky,et al.  Older adults' views of cardiac rehabilitation program: is it time to reinvent? , 2006, Journal of gerontological nursing.

[12]  D. Stewart,et al.  Automatic Referral to Cardiac Rehabilitation , 2004, Medical care.

[13]  S. Ebrahim,et al.  Exercise-based rehabilitation for patients with coronary heart disease: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. , 2004, The American journal of medicine.

[14]  S. Bunker,et al.  Cardiac rehabilitation: under‐referral and underutilisation , 2003, The Medical journal of Australia.

[15]  Geoffrey E. Moore,et al.  ACSM's exercise management for persons with chronic diseases and disabilities , 2003 .

[16]  L. Scott,et al.  Why are women missing from outpatient cardiac rehabilitation programs? A review of multilevel factors affecting referral, enrollment, and completion. , 2002, Journal of women's health.

[17]  G. Jackson,et al.  Factors associated with cardiac rehabilitation attendance: a systematic review of the literature , 2002, Clinical rehabilitation.

[18]  K. Alexander,et al.  Cardiac rehabilitation in the elderly. , 2001, American heart journal.

[19]  K. Teo,et al.  Cardiac rehabilitation referral and attendance: not one and the same. , 1998, Rehabilitation nursing : the official journal of the Association of Rehabilitation Nurses.

[20]  S. Eathorne ACSM's Exercise Management for Persons with Chronic Diseases and Disabilities , 1998 .

[21]  D L Streiner,et al.  The health belief model: predicting compliance and dropout in cardiac rehabilitation. , 1990, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[22]  N. Jones,et al.  Improving Patient Compliance in Cardiac Exercise Rehabilitation: Effects of Written Agreement and Self-Monitoring , 1983 .

[23]  H. Kaiser The Application of Electronic Computers to Factor Analysis , 1960 .