Conditional Density Operators and the Subjectivity of Quantum Operations

Assuming that quantum states, including pure states, represent subjective degrees of belief rather than objective properties of systems, the question of what other elements of the quantum formalism must also be taken as subjective is addressed. In particular, we ask this of the dynamical aspects of the formalism, such as Hamiltonians and unitary operators. Whilst some operations, such as the update maps corresponding to a complete projective measurement, must be subjective, the situation is not so clear in other cases. Here, it is argued that all trace preserving completely positive maps, including unitary operators, should be regarded as subjective, in the same sense as a classical conditional probability distribution. The argument is based on a reworking of the Choi‐Jamiolkowski isomorphism in terms of “conditional” density operators and trace preserving completely positive maps, which mimics the relationship between conditional probabilities and stochastic maps in classical probability.

[1]  J. Kowski Linear transformations which preserve trace and positive semidefiniteness of operators , 1972 .

[2]  Charles H. Bennett,et al.  Quantum cryptography without Bell's theorem. , 1992, Physical review letters.

[3]  Shimon Malin,et al.  What Are Quantum States? , 2006, Quantum Inf. Process..

[4]  R. Griffiths Channel kets, entangled states, and the location of quantum information (16 pages) , 2004, quant-ph/0409106.

[5]  C. Fuchs Quantum Mechanics as Quantum Information (and only a little more) , 2002, quant-ph/0205039.

[6]  B. M. Hill,et al.  Theory of Probability , 1990 .

[7]  M. Caponigro Quantum Mechanics as Quantum Information , 2007 .

[8]  A. Ayer The Identity of Indiscernibles , 1954 .

[9]  Amit Hagar,et al.  A Philosopher Looks at Quantum Information Theory* , 2003, Philosophy of Science.

[10]  I. Hacking The Identity of Indiscernibles , 1975 .

[11]  Nicolas J. Cerf,et al.  2 20 J an 1 99 7 Quantum information theory of entanglement and measurement ? , 1997 .

[12]  C. Adami,et al.  Negative entropy and information in quantum mechanics , 1995, quant-ph/9512022.

[13]  Man-Duen Choi Completely positive linear maps on complex matrices , 1975 .

[14]  C. Fuchs Quantum mechanics as quantum information, mostly , 2003 .

[15]  Mário Ziman,et al.  Programmable Quantum Gate Arrays , 2001 .

[16]  K. Vind A foundation for statistics , 2003 .

[17]  C. Fuchs,et al.  Unknown Quantum States: The Quantum de Finetti Representation , 2001, quant-ph/0104088.

[18]  Carlton M. Caves,et al.  Subjective probability and quantum certainty , 2006 .

[19]  A. Jamiołkowski Linear transformations which preserve trace and positive semidefiniteness of operators , 1972 .

[20]  L. M. M.-T. Theory of Probability , 1929, Nature.

[21]  Karol Zyczkowski,et al.  On Duality between Quantum Maps and Quantum States , 2004, Open Syst. Inf. Dyn..

[22]  M. S. Leifer Quantum dynamics as an analog of conditional probability (12 pages) , 2006 .

[23]  C. Fuchs,et al.  Quantum probabilities as Bayesian probabilities , 2001, quant-ph/0106133.

[24]  P. Arrighi,et al.  On quantum operations as quantum states , 2003, quant-ph/0307024.

[25]  Amit Hagar QUANTUM INFORMATION — WHAT PRICE REALISM? , 2005 .

[26]  C. Adami,et al.  Quantum extension of conditional probability , 1999 .

[27]  Claude E. Shannon,et al.  Communication theory of secrecy systems , 1949, Bell Syst. Tech. J..

[28]  L. J. Savage,et al.  The Foundation of Statistics , 1956 .

[29]  F. Verstraete,et al.  On quantum channels , 2002, quant-ph/0202124.

[30]  S. Popescu,et al.  Classical analog of entanglement , 2001, quant-ph/0107082.

[31]  Ruediger Schack,et al.  De Finetti representation theorem for quantum-process tomography (6 pages) , 2003, quant-ph/0307198.

[32]  Shor,et al.  Simple proof of security of the BB84 quantum key distribution protocol , 2000, Physical review letters.

[33]  Alan Bain,et al.  What is a Stochastic Process , 1942 .

[34]  J. Janszky,et al.  Teleportation: from probability distributions to quantum states , 2000, quant-ph/0011083.

[35]  A. N. Kolmogorov,et al.  Foundations of the theory of probability , 1960 .

[36]  Charles H. Bennett,et al.  Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen channels. , 1993, Physical review letters.

[37]  Kevin Barraclough,et al.  I and i , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[38]  Ruediger Schack,et al.  Unknown Quantum States and Operations, a Bayesian View , 2004, quant-ph/0404156.