Evaluation of general practitioner's time investment during a store-and-forward teledermatology consultation

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE Introduction of teledermatology in general practice changes responsibilities and workloads of general practitioners (GPs) and dermatologists. We investigated the time investment of GPs as well as the relative share of the separate teledermatology activities during a store-and-forward teledermatology consultation. METHODS Sixty-four teledermatology consultations (eight GPs x eight patients) were conducted in a laboratory setting. The starting and ending time of each consultation and of five separate teledermatology activities were recorded by independent observers. The impact of several GP, patient and consultation characteristics on the calculated durations was investigated with repeated measurements analysis. RESULTS The mean duration of a teledermatology consultation was 11:32 min (range 7:02-26:44 min). The activity 'filling out electronic referral form' was the most time consuming teledermatology activity (3:12 min; 28%). Most time was spent on non-TD related consultation activities, e.g. taking medical history (4:43 min; 41%). The first of the eight consultations (p<0.001) and consultations with female patients (p=0.032) took on average more time than subsequent consultations (first consultations 13:42 min (male patients) and 17:03 min (female patients), and subsequent consultations 9:56 min (male patients) and 11:08 min (female patients)). CONCLUSIONS Usage of store-and-forward teledermatology increases the average duration of a GP consultation with at least three and a half minutes. Further integration of teledermatology applications and electronic patients' records may reduce the total duration of a consultation and increase acceptance of teledermatology in general practice.

[1]  M A Hebert,et al.  Impact of IT on Health Care Professionals: Changes in Work and the Productivity Paradox , 1998, Health services management research.

[2]  F. Schellevis,et al.  Tweede Nationale Studie naar ziekten en verrichtingen in de huisartspraktijk: het kind in de huisartspraktijk. , 2005 .

[3]  Martin Frischer,et al.  Barriers to the adoption of computerised decision support systems in general practice consultations: a qualitative study of GPs' perspectives , 2004, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[4]  M D'Souza,et al.  Dermatology opinions via intranet could reduce waiting times , 1999, BMJ.

[5]  J. Whited,et al.  Teledermatology research review , 2006, International journal of dermatology.

[6]  S. Childs,et al.  The relationship between consultation length, process and outcomes in general practice: a systematic review. , 2002, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[7]  D. Simel,et al.  A comparison of work-sampling and time-and-motion techniques for studies in health services research. , 1994, Health services research.

[8]  Dean F. Sittig,et al.  Work-Sampling: A Statistical Approach to Evaluation of the Effect of Computers on Work Patterns in Healthcare , 1993, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[9]  M. Cardol,et al.  Tweede Nationale Studie naar ziekten en verrichtingen in de huisartspraktijk: huisartsenzorg: wat doet de poortwachter? , 2004 .

[10]  Jan De Maeseneer,et al.  Consultation length in general practice: cross sectional study in six European countries , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[11]  D. Pelletier,et al.  Work sampling: valuable methodology to define nursing practice patterns. , 2003, Nursing & health sciences.

[12]  Charles Safran,et al.  Health care in the information society , 2002, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[13]  J. Whited,et al.  An economic analysis of a store and forward teledermatology consult system. , 2003, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[14]  Barry P Chaiken,et al.  Quality and efficiency successes leveraging IT and new processes. , 2007, Journal of healthcare information management : JHIM.

[15]  J. Post,et al.  Teledermatology as a tool for communication between general practitioners and dermatologists , 2001, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[16]  W. Hersh,et al.  Diagnosis, access and outcomes: Update of a systematic review of telemedicine services , 2006, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[17]  L. Valenti,et al.  Determinants of GP billing in Australia: content and time , 2004, The Medical journal of Australia.

[18]  Michael Shapiro,et al.  Comparison of skin biopsy triage decisions in 49 patients with pigmented lesions and skin neoplasms: store-and-forward teledermatology vs face-to-face dermatology. , 2004, Archives of dermatology.

[19]  S A Finkler,et al.  A comparison of work-sampling and time-and-motion techniques for studies in health services research. , 1993, Health services research.

[20]  I. Aas.  Changes in the job situation due to telemedicine , 2002, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[21]  D. Eedy,et al.  A comparison of real‐time and store‐and‐forward teledermatology: a cost–benefit study , 2000, The British journal of dermatology.

[22]  F. Larsen,et al.  Implementing telemedicine services in northern Norway: Barriers and facilitators , 2003, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[23]  J. Groothoff,et al.  Job satisfaction among general practitioners: A systematic literature review , 2006, The European journal of general practice.

[24]  Elske Ammenwerth,et al.  Health care in the information society. A prognosis for the year 2013 , 2002, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[25]  S. Walters,et al.  General practitioners' perceptions of asynchronous telemedicine in a randomized controlled trial of teledermatology , 2004, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.