Robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal reconstruction of urinary diversion by mechanical stapler: prospective evaluation of early and late complications

Introduction Radical cystectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection is the gold standard treatment for non-metastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer and high-risk non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer. For years, the traditional open surgery approach was the only viable option. The widespread of robotic surgery led to its employment also in radical cystectomy to reduce complication rates and improve functional outcomes. Regardless of the type of approach, radical cystectomy is a procedure with high morbidity and not negligible mortality. Data available in the literature show how the use of staplers can offer valid functional outcomes, with an acceptable rate of complications shortening the operative time. The aim of our study was to describe the perioperative outcomes and complications associated with robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with intracorporeal urinary diversion (ICUD) using a mechanical stapler. Material and methods From January 2015 to May 2021, we enrolled patients who underwent RARC with pelvic node dissection and stapled ICUD (ileal conduit or ileal Y-shaped neobladder according to the Perugia ileal neobladder) in our high-volume center. Demographic features, perioperative outcomes and early (≤30 days) and late (>90 days) post-operative complications according to the Clavien–Dindo classification, were recorded for each patient. We also analyzed the potential linear correlation between demographic, pre-operative as well as operative features and the risk of post-operative complications. Results Overall, 112 patients who underwent RARC with ICUD were included with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Intracorporeal Perugia ileal neobladder was performed in 74.1% of cases while ileal conduit was performed in 25.9%. The mean operative time, estimated intraoperative blood loss, and LOS were 289.1 ± 59.7 min, 390.6 ± 186.2 ml, and 17.5 ± 9.8 days, respectively. Early minor and major complications accounted for 26.7% and 10.8%, respectively. Overall late complications were 40.2%. The late most common complications were hydronephrosis (11.6%) and urinary tract infections (20.5%). Stone reservoir formation occurred in 2.7% of patients. Major complications occurred in 5.4%. In the sub-analysis, the mean operative time and the estimated blood loss improved significantly from the first 56 procedures to the last ones. Conclusion RARC with ICUD performed by mechanical stapler is a safe and effective technique. Stapled Y-shaped neobladder did not increase the complication rate.

[1]  M. Gallucci,et al.  Open vs robotic intracorporeal Padua ileal bladder: functional outcomes of a single-centre RCT , 2023, World Journal of Urology.

[2]  Giulia Torregiani,et al.  Robot-assisted vs Open Radical Cystectomy: Randomized Controlled Trials Lights and Shadows. , 2022, The Journal of urology.

[3]  F. Montorsi,et al.  Robot-Assisted, Laparoscopic, and Open Radical Cystectomy: Pre-Operative Data of 1400 Patients From The Italian Radical Cystectomy Registry , 2022, Frontiers in Oncology.

[4]  M. Carini,et al.  Robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and open radical cystectomy: surgical data of 1400 patients from The Italian Radical Cystectomy Registry on intraoperative outcomes , 2022, Central European journal of urology.

[5]  D. Enikeev,et al.  Systematic review: the learning curve for robot-assisted radical cystectomy. What do we know? , 2022, Journal of endourology.

[6]  M. Gallucci,et al.  Open Radical Cystectomy versus Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy with Intracorporeal Urinary Diversion: Early Outcomes of a Single-Center Randomized Controlled Trial , 2022, The Journal of urology.

[7]  C. Fiori,et al.  Robot-assisted-radical-cystectomy with total intracorporeal Y neobladder: Analysis of postoperative complications and functional outcomes with urodynamics findings. , 2021, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[8]  P. Balducci,et al.  Diagnostic performance of the Bladder EpiCheck methylation test and photodynamic diagnosis-guided cystoscopy in the surveillance of high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: A single centre, prospective, blinded clinical trial. , 2021, Urologic oncology.

[9]  T. Habuchi,et al.  Incidence, Etiology, Prevention and Management of Ureteroenteric Strictures after Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy: A Review of Published Evidence and Personal Experience , 2021, Current oncology.

[10]  K. Guru,et al.  Functional outcomes after robot‐assisted radical cystectomy: A review of literature , 2021, International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association.

[11]  M. Gallucci,et al.  Comparison of Patient-reported Health-related Quality of Life Between Open Radical Cystectomy and Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy with Intracorporeal Urinary Diversion: Interim Analysis of a Randomised Controlled Trial. , 2021, European urology focus.

[12]  E. Mearini,et al.  New Evolution of Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: A Single Center Experience with PERUSIA Technique , 2021, Applied Sciences.

[13]  A. Corcoran,et al.  Contemporary techniques and outcomes of robotic assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion , 2019, Translational andrology and urology.

[14]  F. Aljabery,et al.  Stapled versus robot-sewn ileo-ileal anastomosis during robot-assisted radical cystectomy: a review of outcomes in urinary bladder cancer patients , 2020, Scandinavian journal of urology.

[15]  L. Mordasini,et al.  Frailty impact on postoperative complications and early mortality rates in patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: a systematic review , 2020, Arab journal of urology.

[16]  M. Gallucci,et al.  Robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal neobladder: impact of learning curve and long-term assessment of functional outcomes. , 2020, Minerva urologica e nefrologica = The Italian journal of urology and nephrology.

[17]  M. Boğa,et al.  Single-center experience of robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) and extended pelvic lymph node dissection. , 2020, Turkish journal of urology.

[18]  K. Guru,et al.  Robot‐assisted radical cystectomy: Review of surgical technique, and perioperative, oncological and functional outcomes , 2020, International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association.

[19]  Ettore Mearini,et al.  Robot-Assisted Surgery in Urology: The Show Must Go On , 2019, Applied Sciences.

[20]  R. Cirocchi,et al.  Evaluation of Surgical Site Infection in Mini-invasive Urological Surgery , 2019, Open medicine.

[21]  Grahame Smith,et al.  The way forward , 2018, Reaching Net Zero.

[22]  L. Voltolini,et al.  Long-term results after surgical treatment of the dominant lung adenocarcinoma associated with ground-glass opacities. , 2018, Journal of thoracic disease.

[23]  J. Collins,et al.  Ureteric stricture rates and management after robot-assisted radical cystectomy: a single-centre observational study , 2018, Scandinavian journal of urology.

[24]  M. Stöckle,et al.  Robot-sewn ileoileal anastomosis during robot-assisted cystectomy , 2017, World Journal of Urology.

[25]  M. Gallucci,et al.  Robotic Intracorporeal Padua Ileal Bladder: Surgical Technique, Perioperative, Oncologic and Functional Outcomes. , 2016, European urology.

[26]  S. Brancorsini,et al.  Characterization of inflammasome-related genes in urine sediments of patients receiving intravesical BCG therapy. , 2017, Urologic oncology.

[27]  R. Cirocchi,et al.  Full Neurovascular Sparing Extraperitoneal Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: Our Experience with PERUSIA Technique. , 2017, Journal of endourology.

[28]  G. Muto,et al.  Stapled orthotopic ileal neobladder after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: Functional results and complications over a 20-year period. , 2016, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[29]  E. Mearini,et al.  Immediate Radical Cystectomy for Massive Bleeding of Bladder Cancer , 2015, BioMed research international.

[30]  K. Guru,et al.  Robot-assisted radical cystectomy and urinary diversion: technical recommendations from the Pasadena Consensus Panel. , 2015, European urology.

[31]  M. Gallucci,et al.  Risk assessment of stone formation in stapled orthotopic ileal neobladder. , 2015, The Journal of urology.

[32]  Cheng-Li Lin,et al.  A population-based cohort study. , 2015 .

[33]  M. Milowsky,et al.  Association of hospital volume with conditional 90‐day mortality after cystectomy: an analysis of the National Cancer Data Base , 2014, BJU international.

[34]  나군호 International Robotic Radical Cystectomy Consortium: A way forward , 2014 .

[35]  A. Kibel,et al.  Complications after robot-assisted radical cystectomy: results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium. , 2013, European urology.

[36]  R. Weiss,et al.  Contemporary use of titanium staples for orthotopic urinary diversion. , 2012, Urology.

[37]  A. Giannantoni,et al.  Perugia ileal neobladder: functional results and complications , 2012, World Journal of Urology.

[38]  C. Lau,et al.  Standardized analysis of frequency and severity of complications after robot-assisted radical cystectomy. , 2012, European urology.

[39]  T. O'connor The show must go on. , 2012, Nursing New Zealand.

[40]  E. Mohammadi,et al.  Barriers and facilitators related to the implementation of a physiological track and trigger system: A systematic review of the qualitative evidence , 2017, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[41]  M. Osman,et al.  Modified N-shaped ileal neobladder after radical cystectomy. , 2011, Urologic oncology.

[42]  P. Dasgupta,et al.  Analysis of early complications of robotic-assisted radical cystectomy using a standardized reporting system. , 2011, Urology.

[43]  Andrew Stegemann,et al.  Defining morbidity of robot-assisted radical cystectomy using a standardized reporting methodology. , 2011, European urology.

[44]  J. Gore,et al.  Hospital volume and 90-day mortality risk after radical cystectomy: a population-based cohort study , 2011, World Journal of Urology.

[45]  Prokar Dasgupta,et al.  The learning curve of robot-assisted radical cystectomy: results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium. , 2010, European urology.

[46]  D. Scherr,et al.  Critical analysis of complications after robotic‐assisted radical cystectomy with identification of preoperative and operative risk factors , 2010, BJU international.

[47]  J. Stein,et al.  Radical cystectomy for invasive bladder cancer: long-term results of a standard procedure , 2006, World Journal of Urology.

[48]  S. Daneshmand,et al.  A critical analysis of perioperative mortality from radical cystectomy. , 2006, The Journal of urology.

[49]  A. R.,et al.  Review of literature , 1969, American Potato Journal.

[50]  H M Sandler,et al.  Development and validation of the expanded prostate cancer index composite (EPIC) for comprehensive assessment of health-related quality of life in men with prostate cancer. , 2000, Urology.

[51]  I. Osterloh,et al.  The international index of erectile function (IIEF): a multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction. , 1997, Urology.