Overview of the DEMO Design-Staged Approach in Europe

[1]  Antony Loving,et al.  Issues of the vertical blanket segment architecture in DEMO: Current progress and resolution strategies , 2019, Fusion Engineering and Design.

[2]  Fabio Giannetti,et al.  Thermal-hydraulic modeling and analyses of the water-cooled EU DEMO using RELAP5 system code , 2019, Fusion Engineering and Design.

[3]  P. Bruzzone,et al.  Hybrid HTS-Nb3Sn-NbTi DEMO CS coil design optimized for maximum magnetic flux generation , 2019, Fusion Engineering and Design.

[4]  Roberto Ambrosino,et al.  Evaluation of feasibility and costs of alternative magnetic divertor configurations for DEMO , 2019, Fusion Engineering and Design.

[5]  F. Maviglia,et al.  Critical design issues in DEMO and solution strategies , 2019, Fusion Engineering and Design.

[6]  F. Maviglia,et al.  Engineering and integration risks arising from advanced magnetic divertor configurations , 2019, Fusion Engineering and Design.

[7]  R. Zanino,et al.  Recent progress in developing a feasible and integrated conceptual design of the WCLL BB in EUROfusion project , 2019, Fusion Engineering and Design.

[8]  D. Regidor,et al.  The European approach to the fusion-like neutron source: the IFMIF-DONES project , 2019, Nuclear Fusion.

[9]  I. Ricapito,et al.  An overview of the EU breeding blanket design strategy as an integral part of the DEMO design effort , 2019, Fusion Engineering and Design.

[10]  Yves Poitevin,et al.  ITER TBM Program and associated system engineering , 2018, Fusion Engineering and Design.

[11]  G. Federici,et al.  Preliminary design of EU DEMO helium-cooled breeding blanket primary heat transfer system , 2018, Fusion Engineering and Design.

[12]  W. Hering,et al.  Status of EU DEMO heat transport and power conversion systems , 2018, Fusion Engineering and Design.

[13]  F. Maviglia,et al.  Tritium breeding performance of a DEMO based on the Double Null divertor configuration , 2018, Fusion Engineering and Design.

[14]  A. Tarallo,et al.  Study of EU DEMO WCLL breeding blanket and primary heat transfer system integration , 2018, Fusion Engineering and Design.

[15]  A. Tincani,et al.  Tritium technologies and transport modelling: main outcomes from the European TBM Project , 2018, Fusion Engineering and Design.

[16]  W. Arter,et al.  Wall protection strategies for DEMO plasma transients , 2018, Fusion Engineering and Design.

[17]  G. Federici,et al.  Progress in EU Breeding Blanket design and integration , 2018, Fusion Engineering and Design.

[18]  R. Ambrosino,et al.  Exploring a broad spectrum of design options for DEMO , 2018, Fusion Engineering and Design.

[19]  Sergio Ciattaglia,et al.  Initial layout of DEMO buildings and configuration of the main plant systems , 2018, Fusion Engineering and Design.

[20]  Y. Sakamoto,et al.  Plasma exhaust and divertor studies in Japan and Europe broader approach, DEMO design activity , 2018, Fusion Engineering and Design.

[21]  M. E. Biancolini,et al.  Progress in the design of the superconducting magnets for the EU DEMO , 2018, Fusion Engineering and Design.

[22]  P. Sardain,et al.  DEMO design using the SYCOMORE system code: Influence of technological constraints on the reactor performances , 2018, Fusion Engineering and Design.

[23]  P. Bruzzone,et al.  DEMO Central Solenoid Design Based on the Use of HTS Sections at Highest Magnetic Field , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[24]  A. della Corte,et al.  A Prototype Conductor by React&WIND Method for the EUROfusion DEMO TF Coils , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[25]  W. Fietz,et al.  Critical Current Densities of 482 A/mm2 in HTS CrossConductors at 4.2 K and 12 T , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[26]  Yves Poitevin,et al.  The European ITER Test Blanket Modules: EUROFER97 material and TBM’s fabrication technologies development and qualification , 2017 .

[27]  G. Federici,et al.  Uncertainties in power plant design point evaluations , 2017 .

[28]  B. J. Peters,et al.  Analysis of low pressure hydrogen separation from fusion exhaust gases by the means of superpermeability , 2017 .

[29]  Qingwei Yang,et al.  Overview of the present progress and activities on the CFETR , 2017 .

[30]  Mark R. Gilbert,et al.  European DEMO design strategy and consequences for materials , 2017 .

[31]  P. Bruzzone,et al.  Design and R&D for the DEMO Toroidal Field Coils Based on Nb3Sn React and Wind Method , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[32]  L. Zani,et al.  EU-DEMO TF and CS Magnet Systems Design and Analyses Performed at CEA , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[33]  A. della Corte,et al.  Design, Manufacture, and Test of an 80 kA-Class Nb3Sn Cable-In-Conduit Conductor With Rectangular Geometry and Distributed Pressure Relief Channels , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[34]  V. Parail,et al.  Gyrokinetic projection of the divertor heat-flux width from present tokamaks to ITER , 2017, 1701.05507.

[35]  Christian Bachmann,et al.  Neutronic analyses of design issues affecting the tritium breeding performance in different DEMO blanket concepts , 2016 .

[36]  R. Ambrosino,et al.  Limitations of transient power loads on DEMO and analysis of mitigation techniques , 2016 .

[37]  N. Bekris,et al.  Advanced design of the mechanical Tritium pumping system for JET DTE2 , 2016 .

[38]  T. Franke,et al.  Overview of the design approach and prioritization of R&D activities towards an EU DEMO , 2016 .

[39]  T. Sketchley,et al.  MHD PbLi experiments in MaPLE loop at UCLA , 2016 .

[40]  J. Morris,et al.  "PROCESS": a systems code for fusion power plants - Part 2:Engineering , 2016, 1601.06147.

[41]  P. Bruzzone,et al.  Test of 60 kA coated conductor cable prototypes for fusion magnets , 2015 .

[42]  Massimiliano Mattei,et al.  Advances in the physics basis for the European DEMO design , 2015 .

[43]  David Ward,et al.  “PROCESS”: A systems code for fusion power plants—Part 1: Physics , 2014 .

[44]  T. Giegerich,et al.  The KALPUREX-Process - A new vacuum pumping process for exhaust gases in fusion power plants , 2014 .

[45]  P. F. Morris,et al.  Developing structural, high-heat flux and plasma facing materials for a near-term DEMO fusion power plant: The EU assessment , 2014, 1408.3546.

[46]  T. Giegerich,et al.  The direct internal recycling concept to simplify the fuel cycle of a fusion power plant , 2013 .

[47]  B. Wan,et al.  Study on H-mode access at low density with lower hybrid current drive and lithium-wall coatings on the EAST superconducting tokamak , 2011 .

[48]  A. Loarte,et al.  Assessment of erosion of the ITER divertor targets during type I ELMs , 2003 .

[49]  W. Daenner,et al.  Blanket testing in NET , 1989 .

[50]  F. Wagner,et al.  Regime of Improved Confinement and High Beta in Neutral-Beam-Heated Divertor Discharges of the ASDEX Tokamak , 1982 .

[51]  An enhanced near-term HCPB configuration as driver blanket for the EU DEMO , 2019 .

[52]  O. Sauter,et al.  Development of a Plasma Scenario for the EU-DEMO: Current Activities and Perspectives , 2018 .

[53]  Fabio Giannetti,et al.  EU DEMO Heat Transport and Power Conversion System design: options and status , 2018 .

[54]  R. Browna,et al.  Fusion Engineering and Design DEMO design activity in Europe: Progress and updates , 2018 .

[55]  P. Vincenzi,et al.  The physics and technology basis entering European system code studies for DEMO , 2016 .

[56]  Muyuan Li,et al.  Sweeping heat flux loads on divertor targets: Thermal benefits and structural impacts , 2016 .