Examining the Effects of Power as a Function of Self-Construals and Gender

Building on prior work showing that the effects of power depend on the goals that people associate with power (Chen, Lee-Chai, & Bargh, 2001), the present research examined the goals powerholders pursue as a function of their self-construal and gender. An independent self-construal, or a view of the self as separate from others, is associated with the promotion of one's own goals, while an interdependent self-construal, or a view of the self as interconnected with others, entails a focus on others' goals. Because power affords the opportunity to pursue one's current goals, when power is coupled with an independent self-construal, self-interest goals are likely to be enhanced, whereas power combined with an interdependent self-construal should heighten other-oriented goals. In light of research suggesting gender differences in self-construals (e.g., Cross & Madson, 1997a), it was hypothesized that men and women would experience particular combinations of power and self-construals differently, resulting in distinct power-goal effects. Participants read a vignette describing a situation in which their own interests were pitted against another person's interests. The results showed that different combinations of power and self-construals—and the sense of independence or interdependence associated with them—led men and women to pursue similar goals in response to the vignette situation. Overall, these findings represent a first step in examining the joint role of self-construals and gender in determining the effects of power.

[1]  S. Cousins Culture and self-perception in Japan and the United States. , 1989 .

[2]  D. Winter,et al.  Arousal of the power motive in women. , 1976, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology.

[3]  Angela Y. Lee,et al.  “I” Value Freedom, but “We” Value Relationships: Self-Construal Priming Mirrors Cultural Differences in Judgment , 1999 .

[4]  H. Markus,et al.  Deviance or uniqueness, harmony or conformity? A cultural analysis. , 1999 .

[5]  John B. Pryor,et al.  A Social Psychological Model for Predicting Sexual Harassment , 1995 .

[6]  John A. Bargh,et al.  The use and abuse of power: Multiple perspectives on the causes of corruption. , 2001 .

[7]  Cameron Anderson,et al.  Power, Approach, and Inhibition , 2003 .

[8]  J. Pryor,et al.  Sexual Cognition Processes in Men High in the Likelihood to Sexually Harass , 1994 .

[9]  P Raymond,et al.  Attractiveness of the underling: an automatic power --> sex association and its consequences for sexual harassment and aggression. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  N. Malamuth The attraction to sexual aggression scale: I. , 1989 .

[11]  D. Winter The power motive in women―and men , 1988 .

[12]  D. Trafimow,et al.  Some tests of the distinction between the private self and the collective self. , 1991 .

[13]  Sharon Shavitt,et al.  Persuasion and culture: Advertising appeals in individualistic and collectivistic societies. , 1994 .

[14]  Linda L. Carli Gender, Interpersonal Power, and Social Influence , 1999 .

[15]  H. Markus,et al.  Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. , 1991 .

[16]  R. Baumeister,et al.  The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[17]  A. Aron,et al.  Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness , 1992 .

[18]  Blair T. Johnson,et al.  Gender and Leadership Style: A Meta-Analysis , 1990 .

[19]  D. Lisak,et al.  Motivational factors in nonincarcerated sexually aggressive men. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[20]  Susan T. Fiske,et al.  Control, Interdependence and Power: Understanding Social Cognition in Its Social Context , 1996 .

[21]  S. Cross,et al.  Models of the self: self-construals and gender. , 1997, Psychological bulletin.

[22]  Neil M. Malamuth,et al.  The attraction to sexual aggression scale: Part one 1 , 1989 .

[23]  A. Eagly Sex differences in social behavior : a social-role interpretation , 1987 .

[24]  Judith A. Hall,et al.  Status, Gender, and Nonverbal Behavior: A Study of Structured Interactions between Employees of a Company , 1999 .

[25]  J. Pryor,et al.  A Social Psychological Analysis of Sexual Harassment: The Person/Situation Interaction , 1993 .

[26]  S. Fiske,et al.  Power Can Bias Impression Processes: Stereotyping Subordinates by Default and by Design , 2000 .

[27]  W. Gardner,et al.  Are there "his" and "hers" types of interdependence? The implications of gender differences in collective versus relational interdependence for affect, behavior, and cognition. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[28]  D. Winter,et al.  Self-definition and social definition in women. , 1974 .

[29]  W. Gardner,et al.  Confucius, "jen", and the benevolent use of power: The interdependent self as a "psychological contract" preventing exploitation , 2001 .

[30]  A. Eagly,et al.  Sex of researchers and sex-typed communications as determinants of sex differences in influenceability: A meta-analysis of social influence studies , 1981 .

[31]  A. Aron,et al.  Close Relationships as Including Other in the Self , 1991 .

[32]  R. Baumeister,et al.  What do men want? Gender differences and two spheres of belongingness: comment on Cross and Madson (1997) , 1997, Psychological bulletin.

[33]  J. Bargh,et al.  Attitudes and Social Cognition Relationship Orientation as a Moderator of the Effects of Social Power , 2022 .

[34]  P. Blumstein,et al.  Sex, power, and influence tactics in intimate relationships , 1986 .

[35]  Linda L. Carli Gender differences in interaction style and influence. , 1989 .

[36]  John B. Pryor,et al.  Sexual harassment proclivities in men , 1987 .

[37]  M. Brewer,et al.  Who is this "We"? Levels of collective identity and self representations. , 1996 .

[38]  M. Clark,et al.  Interpersonal attraction in exchange and communal relationships. , 1979 .

[39]  N. Malamuth,et al.  Predictors of naturalistic sexual aggression. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[40]  H. Triandis The Self and Social Behavior in Differing Cultural Contexts , 1989 .

[41]  Susan E. Cross,et al.  Elaboration of Models of the Self: Reply to Baumeister and Sommer (1997) and Martin and Ruble (1997) , 1997 .

[42]  Marianne LaFrance,et al.  Option or obligation to smile: The effects of power and gender on facial expression. , 1999 .

[43]  Paula Johnson Women and Power: Toward a Theory of Effectiveness , 1976 .

[44]  J. D. Campbell,et al.  Self-esteem and clarity of the self-concept. , 1990, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[45]  Linda L. Carli,et al.  Interpersonal Relations and Group Processes Gender, Language, and Influence , 2022 .