Efficient Detection of Small Moving Objects

A signal processing problem encountered with many sensor systems having a wide field-of-view is detection of small, unresolved objects moving in a straight line amid stationary clutter. The wide field-of-view combined with the need to accurately pinpoint object positions imply that these sensors must have hundreds of thousands of samples in their output. To process this amount of data in a timely fashion, computationally efficient algorithms are a necessity. In this report, a computationally efficient set of algorithms is described for detecting satellites, meteorites, and other moving objects using data from an optical telescope charge-coupled device (CCD) focal plane in the MIT Lincoln Laboratory Demonstration Surveillance System (DSS). The trade-off of reduced detection sensitivity for lower computational cost in the algorithm is quantitatively discussed. Major techniques employed are: 1. Sample normalization by temporal mean and standard deviation to suppress clutter. 2. Maximum value projection to reduce the dimensionality of the data. 3. A two-stage matched filter detector which first nominates and then confirms signal candidates. 4. Two-dimensional binary velocity filtering. The techniques should have practical application to other wide field-of-view sensors where moving object detection is important.

[1]  D L Fried Statistics of laser beam fade induced by pointing jitter. , 1973, Applied optics.

[2]  N. C. Mohanty Computer Tracking of Moving Point Targets in Space , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[3]  W. Struzinski ORing loss for quantizers followed by an ORing device and an accumulator , 1982 .

[4]  W. Struzinski,et al.  Integration and signal-to-noise ratio requirements for a signal processing system containing an ORing device , 1983 .

[5]  R.M. Gagliardi,et al.  Application of Three-Dimensional Filtering to Moving Target Detection , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[6]  Leonard Cimini,et al.  Data Quantization for Narrowband Signal Detection , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[7]  A. Nuttall Detection performance characteristics for a system with quantizers, OR‐ing, and accumulator , 1983 .

[8]  W. Struzinski Performance model for square law detectors followed by accumulators and an ORing device , 1983 .

[9]  Yair Barniv,et al.  Dynamic Programming Solution for Detecting Dim Moving Targets , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[10]  Benjamin Friedlander,et al.  A frequency domain approach to multiframe detection and estimation of dim targets , 1987, ICASSP '87. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[11]  G. Bottomley The effects of cross-correlated noise and multi-channel signal on ORing loss , 1987, ICASSP '87. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[12]  P. L. Chu Efficient CFAR detection of line segments in a 2-D image , 1987, ICASSP '87. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[13]  Yeunung Chen On the Design of Suboptimal Matched Filters for Three-Dimensional Moving Target Detection , 1987 .

[14]  P. L. Chu Optimal projection for multidimensional signal detection , 1988, ICASSP-88., International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[15]  Steven D. Blostein,et al.  Detection of small moving objects in image sequences using multistage hypothesis testing , 1988, ICASSP-88., International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.