A field data example of Marchenko multiple elimination

Multiple reflections are often considered as noise in seismic data. Dealing with them has attracted much attention from industry and academia. A variety of schemes have been developed for removal of free-surface multiple reflections and success has been achieved in numerical and field datasets. However, less attention has been directed toward internal multiple reflection removal. The Marchenko multiple elimination scheme is capable to eliminate internal multiple reflections without model information or adaptive subtraction. This scheme is derived from coupled Marchenko-type equations by projecting the focusing functions from the focusing level back to the acquisition surface. Primary reflections are filtered from acquired seismic data. We apply the Marchenko multiple elimination scheme to a deep water 2D field dataset from the Norwegian North Sea to test the performance. We show that the Marchenko multiple elimination scheme is an appropriate method for removing internal multiple reflections when high-quality pre-processing is performed.

[1]  Yibo Wang,et al.  Reverse time migration of multiples: Eliminating migration artifacts in angle domain common image gathers , 2014 .

[2]  N. Chemingui,et al.  Separated-wavefield imaging using primary and multiple energy , 2015 .

[3]  D. J. Verschuur,et al.  Estimating primaries by sparse inversion and application to near-offset data reconstruction , 2009 .

[4]  Yi Luo,et al.  Elimination of land internal multiples based on the inverse scattering series , 2011 .

[5]  D. J. Verschuur,et al.  Removal of internal multiples with the common-focus-point (CFP) approach: Part 2 — Application strategies and data examples , 2005 .

[6]  Matteo Ravasi,et al.  Internal multiple prediction and removal using marchenko autofocusing and seismic interferometry , 2015 .

[7]  D. J. Verschuur,et al.  Adaptive surface-related multiple elimination , 1992 .

[8]  Arthur B. Weglein,et al.  An inverse-scattering series method for attenuating multiples in seismic reflection data , 1997 .

[9]  Fons ten Kroode,et al.  Prediction of internal multiples , 2002 .

[10]  Evert Slob,et al.  Transmission compensated primary reflection retrieval in the data domain and consequences for imaging , 2019, GEOPHYSICS.

[11]  Joost van der Neut,et al.  Adaptive overburden elimination with the multidimensional Marchenko equation , 2016 .

[12]  D. J. Verschuur,et al.  Estimation of multiple scattering by iterative inversion, Part I: Theoretical considerations , 1997 .

[13]  Evert Slob,et al.  Free-surface and internal multiple elimination in one step without adaptive subtraction , 2019, GEOPHYSICS.

[14]  Yibo Wang,et al.  Reverse time migration of multiples: Reducing migration artifacts using the wavefield decomposition imaging condition , 2017 .

[15]  D. J. Verschuur,et al.  Seismic migration of blended shot records with surface-related multiple scattering , 2011 .

[16]  D. J. Verschuur,et al.  Restoration of missing offsets by parabolic Radon transform1 , 1995 .

[17]  D. Verschuur,et al.  Including and using internal multiples in closed-loop imaging — Field data examples , 2018, GEOPHYSICS.

[18]  Andrew Curtis,et al.  Relating source-receiver interferometry to an inverse-scattering series to derive a new method to estimate internal multiples , 2016 .

[19]  Joost van der Neut,et al.  Source-receiver Marchenko redatuming on field data using an adaptive double-focusing method , 2018 .

[20]  Arthur B. Weglein,et al.  Inverse Scattering Series For Multiple Attenuation: An Example With Surface And Internal Multiples , 1994 .

[21]  Evert Slob,et al.  Marchenko imagingMarchenko imaging , 2014 .

[22]  N. D. Whitmore,et al.  Imaging of primaries and multiples using a dual-sensor towed streamer , 2010 .

[23]  Ken H. Matson,et al.  Inverse Scattering Internal Multiple Attenuation: Results From Complex Synthetic And Field Data Examples , 1999 .

[24]  Lele Zhang,et al.  Marchenko scheme based internal multiple reflection elimination in acoustic wavefield , 2018, Journal of Applied Geophysics.

[25]  Evert Slob,et al.  Data-driven internal multiple elimination and its consequences for imaging : A comparison of strategies , 2019 .

[26]  A. J. Berkhout,et al.  Review Paper: An outlook on the future of seismic imaging, Part II: Full‐Wavefield Migration , 2014 .

[27]  Evert Slob,et al.  Seismic reflector imaging using internal multiples with Marchenko-type equations , 2014 .