The vertical monitor position for presbyopic computer users with progressive lenses: how to reach clear vision and comfortable head posture

When presbyopic employees are wearing general-purpose progressive lenses, they have clear vision only with a lower gaze inclination to the computer monitor, given the head assumes a comfortable inclination. Therefore, in the present intervention field study the monitor position was lowered, also with the aim to reduce musculoskeletal symptoms. A comparison group comprised users of lenses that do not restrict the field of clear vision. The lower monitor positions led the participants to lower their head inclination, which was linearly associated with a significant reduction in musculoskeletal symptoms. However, for progressive lenses a lower head inclination means a lower zone of clear vision, so that clear vision of the complete monitor was not achieved, rather the monitor should have been placed even lower. The procedures of this study may be useful for optimising the individual monitor position depending on the comfortable head and gaze inclination and the vertical zone of clear vision of progressive lenses. Practitioner summary: For users of general-purpose progressive lenses, it is suggested that low monitor positions allow for clear vision at the monitor and for a physiologically favourable head inclination. Employees may improve their workplace using a flyer providing ergonomic-optometric information.

[1]  Jennifer Long,et al.  Forging partnerships between optometrists and ergonomists to improve visual comfort and productivity in the workplace. , 2014, Work.

[2]  S G Hill,et al.  Preferred Declination of the Line of Sight , 1986, Human factors.

[3]  M. Mon-Williams,et al.  Vertical Gaze Direction and Postural Adjustment : An Extension of the Heuer Model , 2010 .

[4]  Wolfgang Jaschinski,et al.  How to place the computer monitor: measurements of vertical zones of clear vision with presbyopic corrections , 2015, Clinical & experimental optometry.

[5]  Keir Fraser,et al.  The influence of computer monitor height on head and neck posture 1 Requests for reprints should be , 1999 .

[6]  Michael C. Bartha,et al.  Computer Display Placement for Progressive Addition Lens Wearers: A Field Observation of Multiple Display Conditions , 2009 .

[7]  R. Burgess-Limerick,et al.  The effect of imposed and self-selected computer monitor height on posture and gaze angle. , 1998, Clinical biomechanics.

[8]  E Grandjean,et al.  VDT Workstation Design: Preferred Settings and Their Effects , 1983, Human factors.

[9]  M Menozzi,et al.  [The suitability of various cephalometric planes for the determination of vertical alignment of the head]. , 1996, Zeitschrift fur Morphologie und Anthropologie.

[10]  Arne Aarås,et al.  Work with visual display units: Long-term health effects of high and downward line-of-sight in ordinary office environments , 2006 .

[11]  R. Jampel,et al.  The primary position of the eyes, the resetting saccade, and the transverse visual head plane. Head movements around the cervical joints. , 1992, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[12]  James E Sheedy,et al.  The optics of occupational progressive lenses. , 2005, Optometry.

[13]  Magne Helland,et al.  A multidisciplinary approach to solving computer related vision problems , 2012, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[14]  H Kylian,et al.  Preferred position of visual displays relative to the eyes: a field study of visual strain and individual differences. , 1998, Ergonomics.

[15]  J. Anshel.  Visual ergonomics handbook , 2005 .

[16]  Jeffrey Anshel,et al.  Visual ergonomics standards for contemporary office environments , 2014 .

[17]  John R Hayes,et al.  Progressive addition lenses--measurements and ratings. , 2006, Optometry.

[18]  Judith Masseida,et al.  Verschiedene Kenngrößen für die physiologisch günstige Kopfneigung , 2013 .

[19]  Carolyn M. Sommerich,et al.  Effects of Computer Monitor Viewing Angle and Related Factors on Strain, Performance, and Preference Outcomes , 2001, Hum. Factors.

[20]  L Straker,et al.  Effect of visual display height on modelled upper and lower cervical gravitational moment, muscle capacity and relative strain , 2009, Ergonomics.

[21]  P H RIPPLE.  Variation of accommodation in vertical directions of gaze. , 1952, American journal of ophthalmology.

[22]  Doug Kokot,et al.  Computer Display Viewing Angles: Is it Time to Shed a Few Degrees? , 2005 .

[23]  P. Lachenbruch.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[24]  M Thoresen,et al.  Musculoskeletal, visual and psychosocial stress in VDU operators before and after multidisciplinary ergonomic interventions. , 1998, Applied ergonomics.

[25]  Gunnar Horgen,et al.  Musculoskeletal, visual and psychosocial stress in VDU operators after moving to an ergonomically designed office landscape. , 2008, Applied ergonomics.

[26]  H. Krueger,et al.  Direction of gaze and comfort: discovering the relation for the ergonomic optimization of visual tasks , 1994, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[27]  Nico J Delleman,et al.  Touch-typing VDU operation: workstation adjustment, working posture and workers' perceptions , 2002, Ergonomics.

[28]  M Brüwer,et al.  Preferred vertical gaze direction and observation distance. , 1991, Ergonomics.

[29]  Marino Menozzi,et al.  Training in ergonomics at VDU workplaces , 1999 .

[30]  A Aarås,et al.  Musculoskeletal, visual and psychosocial stress in VDU operators before and after multidisciplinary ergonomic interventions. A 6 years prospective study--Part II. , 2001, Applied ergonomics.

[31]  Michael C. Bartha,et al.  A Field Observation of Display Placement Requirements for Presbyopic and Prepresbyopic Computer Users , 2010 .

[32]  Magne Helland,et al.  A vision for strengthening partnerships between optometry and ergonomics , 2011 .

[33]  Edgar Erdfelder,et al.  G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[34]  P M Bongers,et al.  Are neck flexion, neck rotation, and sitting at work risk factors for neck pain? Results of a prospective cohort study , 2001, Occupational and environmental medicine.

[35]  Arne Ohlendorf,et al.  Comparison of progressive addition lenses for general purpose and for computer vision: an office field study , 2015, Clinical & experimental optometry.

[36]  Gunnar Horgen,et al.  Do Specially Designed Visual Display Unit Lenses Create Increased Postural Load Compared with Single-Vision Lenses during Visual Display Unit Work? , 2002, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[37]  Knut Inge Fostervold,et al.  VDU work with downward gaze : The emperor's new clothes or scientifically sound? , 2003 .

[38]  J. Sheedy,et al.  Correlation Analysis of the Optics of Progressive Addition Lenses , 2004, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[39]  G Horgen,et al.  Is there a reduction in postural load when wearing progressive lenses during VDT work over a three-month period? , 1995, Applied ergonomics.

[40]  Jens Wahlström,et al.  Ergonomics, musculoskeletal disorders and computer work. , 2005, Occupational medicine.

[41]  James E Sheedy,et al.  Progressive addition lenses--matching the specific lens to patient needs. , 2004, Optometry.

[42]  Mark Rosenfield,et al.  Computer vision syndrome: a review of ocular causes and potential treatments , 2011, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[43]  V Koitcheva,et al.  Fixation disparity, accommodation, dark vergence and dark focus during inclined gaze * , 1998, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[44]  Robin Burgess-Limerick,et al.  Participatory ergonomics case study: Coal handling train crew operations , 2013 .

[45]  Stephanie Jainta,et al.  Fixation Disparity: Binocular Vergence Accuracy for a Visual Display at Different Positions Relative to the Eyes , 2002, Hum. Factors.

[46]  Wolfgang Jaschinski,et al.  Web-based office ergonomics intervention on work-related complaints: a field study , 2013, Ergonomics.

[47]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[48]  Judith Masseida,et al.  Messmethoden und Eigenschaften der physiologisch günstigen Blickneigung , 2013 .

[49]  W. Jaschinski.  The Proximity-Fixation-Disparity Curve and the Preferred Viewing Distance at a Visual Display as an Indicator of Near Vision Fatigue , 2002, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[50]  Wolfgang Jaschinski.  Niedrig aufgestellte Flachbildschirme erleichtern die Benutzung von Universal-Gleitsichtbrillen am Bildschirmarbeitsplatz , 2008 .

[51]  A. Aarås,et al.  Will Visual Discomfort among Visual Display Unit (VDU) Users Change in Development When Moving from Single Vision Lenses to Specially Designed VDU Progressive Lenses? , 2004, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[52]  Dennis R. Ankrum,et al.  Head and Neck Posture at Computer Workstations - What's Neutral? , 2000 .

[53]  H Kylian,et al.  A procedure to determine the individually comfortable position of visual displays relative to the eyes. , 1999, Ergonomics.

[54]  Marino Menozzi,et al.  Evaluation of progressive lenses by means of a field study. , 2011 .

[55]  K H Kroemer,et al.  Preferred line of sight angle. , 1986, Ergonomics.