A computational model

[1]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  Prospects for usage-based computational models of grammatical development: argument structure and semantic roles. , 2014, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[2]  Kenneth John Aitken,et al.  How do forward models work? And why would you want them? , 2013, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[3]  Inbal Arnon,et al.  More than Words: The Effect of Multi-word Frequency and Constituency on Phonetic Duration , 2013, Language and speech.

[4]  J. Elman,et al.  Knowing a lot for one's age: Vocabulary skill and not age is associated with anticipatory incremental sentence interpretation in children and adults. , 2012, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[5]  N. Janssen,et al.  Phrase Frequency Effects in Language Production , 2012, PloS one.

[6]  Michael Ramscar,et al.  Granularity and the acquisition of grammatical gender: How order-of-acquisition affects what gets learned , 2012, Cognition.

[7]  C. Westbury,et al.  Processing Advantages of Lexical Bundles: Evidence from Self-Paced Reading and Sentence Recall Tasks. , 2011 .

[8]  S. Frank,et al.  Insensitivity of the Human Sentence-Processing System to Hierarchical Structure , 2011, Psychological science.

[9]  Inbal Arnon,et al.  Why Brush Your Teeth Is Better Than Teeth – Children's Word Production Is Facilitated in Familiar Sentence-Frames , 2011 .

[10]  Jessica F. Hay,et al.  Learning in reverse: Eight-month-old infants track backward transitional probabilities , 2009, Cognition.

[11]  Pierre Perruchet,et al.  A role for backward transitional probabilities in word segmentation? , 2008, Memory & cognition.

[12]  Michael Tomasello,et al.  Automatic evaluation of syntactic learners in typologically-different languages , 2008, Cognitive Systems Research.

[13]  Colin Bannard,et al.  Stored Word Sequences in Language Learning , 2008, Psychological science.

[14]  Michael Ramscar,et al.  Linguistic Self-Correction in the Absence of Feedback: A New Approach to the Logical Problem of Language Acquisition , 2007, Cogn. Sci..

[15]  Fernanda Ferreira,et al.  The 'Good Enough' Approach to Language Comprehension , 2007, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[16]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  Word chunk frequencies affect the processing of pronominal object-relative clauses , 2007, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[17]  Elissa L. Newport,et al.  Statistical Learning of Syntax: The Role of Transitional Probability , 2007 .

[18]  Anna L. Theakston,et al.  A dense corpus study of past tense and plural overregularization in English. , 2004, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[19]  A. Sanford,et al.  Depth of processing in language comprehension: not noticing the evidence , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[20]  J. Saffran Constraints on Statistical Language Learning , 2002 .

[21]  Dan Roth,et al.  The Use of Classifiers in Sequential Inference , 2001, NIPS.

[22]  B. MacWhinney The Childes Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk, Volume II: the Database , 2000 .

[23]  A. Wray Formulaic language in learners and native speakers , 1999, Language Teaching.

[24]  Hinrich Schütze,et al.  Book Reviews: Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing , 1999, CL.

[25]  A. Vinter,et al.  PARSER: A Model for Word Segmentation , 1998 .

[26]  Mark Steedman,et al.  Interaction with context during human sentence processing , 1988, Cognition.

[27]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  Meaning Overrides Frequency in Idiomatic and Compositional Multiword Chunks , 2013, CogSci.

[28]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  Learning Simple Statistics for Language Comprehension and Production: The CAPPUCCINO Model , 2011, CogSci.

[29]  M. Tomasello Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition , 2003 .

[30]  Alison Wray,et al.  Formulaic Language and the Lexicon: List of Figures and Tables , 2002 .

[31]  William Croft,et al.  Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective , 2001 .

[32]  R. Langacker Foundations of cognitive grammar , 1983 .