This article surveys the physiological impact of waterproof textiles on the wearers of protective clothing. Wearer trials with test subjects in a climatic chamber involve ambient temperatures of +20. 0, and -20°C. The physiological function of breathable materials in comparison to a water vapor impermeable construction is quantified. Results show that water vapor permeable constructions offer a clear benefit to wearers at all tested temperatures: moisture accumulation in the breathable protective garments and in whole clothing systems are much smaller than in the nonbreathable one. Additionally, the ratio of evaporated sweat to produced sweat E/P is much higher for breathable constructions. Differences are statistically significant at levels of p > 0.995 or higher. There is no indication of a temperature dependency of the water vapor resistance of hydrophilic membrane laminates, but results show that. especially at ambient temperatures far below the freezing point. such breathable foul weather protective textiles still offer a great benefit to wearers.
[1]
R. F. Goldman,et al.
Predicting metabolic energy cost.
,
1971,
Journal of applied physiology.
[2]
R. F. Goldman,et al.
Predicting rectal temperature response to work, environment, and clothing.
,
1972,
Journal of applied physiology.
[3]
P. Gennes.
Scaling Concepts in Polymer Physics
,
1979
.
[4]
R. J. Osczevski,et al.
Anomalous Diffusion in a Water Vapour Permeable, Waterproof Coating
,
1989
.
[5]
W. A. Lotens,et al.
Variation of Water Vapor Resistance of Microporous and Hydrophilic Films with Relative Humidity
,
1990
.
[6]
R. J. Osczevski.
Water Vapor Transfer Through a Hydrophilic Film at Subzero Temperatures
,
1996
.
[7]
S. C. Harlock,et al.
Moisture Vapor Transport Through Waterproof Breathable Fabrics and Clothing Systems Under a Temperature Gradient
,
1998
.