Interactions between first- and second-order motion revealed by optokinetic nystagmus

Abstract. A previous study has suggested that second-order motion is ineffective at driving optokinetic nystagmus (OKN) when presented alone. First- and second-order motion cues interact in creating the perception of motion. Is there an interaction between first- and second-order cues in the control of eye movements? We presented combinations of first- and second-order cues moving in the same or opposite directions and measured the eye movements evoked, to look for a modification of the oculomotor response to first-order motion by simultaneously presented second-order cues. Dynamic random noise was used as a carrier for first- and second-order drifting gratings (13.4°/s; 0.25 cycles/°; 64×48° screen viewed at 28.5 cm). Second-order gratings were defined by spatial modulation of the luminance flicker frequency of noise pixels of constant contrast (50%). A first-order, luminance-defined grating (13.4°/s; 0.25 cycles/°; variable contrast from 4–50%) was moved in either the same or the opposite direction. Eye movements were recorded by video-oculography from six subjects as they looked straight ahead. The gain (eye velocity/stimulus velocity) of first-order-evoked OKN increased with contrast. The presence of flicker-defined second-order motion in the opposite direction attenuated this OKN below a first-order contrast of 15%, although it had little effect at higher contrasts. When first- and second-order motion were in the same direction, there was an enhancement of the OKN response. We conclude that second-order motion can modify the optokinetic response to simultaneously presented first-order motion.

[1]  David R. Badcock,et al.  The low level motion system has both chromatic and luminance inputs , 1985, Vision Research.

[2]  L. Harris.  Contrast sensitivity and acuity of a conscious cat measured by the occipital evoked potential , 1978, Vision Research.

[3]  G. Mather,et al.  Evidence for second-order motion detectors , 1993, Vision Research.

[4]  Masao Ohmi,et al.  Optokinetic nystagmus: The effects of stationary edges, alone and in combination with central occlusion , 1986, Vision Research.

[5]  Han Collewijn,et al.  Control of human optokinetic nystagmus by the central and peripheral retina: Effects of partial visual field masking, scotopic vision and central retinal scotomata , 1986, Brain Research.

[6]  C. Schor,et al.  Contribution of chromatic mechanisms to the production of small-field optokinetic nystagmus (OKN) in normals and strabismics , 1996, Vision Research.

[7]  G. Sperling,et al.  The functional architecture of human visual motion perception , 1995, Vision Research.

[8]  G. Sperling,et al.  Drift-balanced random stimuli: a general basis for studying non-Fourier motion perception. , 1988, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[9]  T. Albright,et al.  Motion coherency rules are form-cue invariant , 1992, Vision Research.

[10]  A. T. Smith,et al.  Motion defined exclusively by second-order characteristics does not evoke optokinetic nystagmus , 1992, Visual Neuroscience.

[11]  J. Hennig,et al.  The Processing of First- and Second-Order Motion in Human Visual Cortex Assessed by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  M Donaghy,et al.  The contrast sensitivity, spatial resolution and velocity tuning of the cat's optokinetic reflex. , 1980, The Journal of physiology.

[13]  D. Bremer,et al.  Contrast sensitivity of optokinetic nystagmus , 1991, Vision Research.

[14]  David R. Badcock,et al.  Analysis of the motion of 2-dimensional patterns: Evidence for a second-order process , 1992, Vision Research.

[15]  C. R. Michael.  Receptive fields of single optic nerve fibers in a mammal with an all-cone retina. I: contrast-sensitive units. , 1968, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  ANDREW T SMITH,et al.  Separate Detection of Moving Luminance and Contrast Modulations: Fact or Artifact? , 1997, Vision Research.

[17]  Shin'ya Nishida,et al.  Dual multiple-scale processing for motion in the human visual System , 1997, Vision Research.

[18]  C. W. Oyster,et al.  Direction-selective retinal ganglion cells and control of optokinetic nystagmus in the rabbit. , 1972, Vision research.

[19]  Andrew T. Smith,et al.  Evidence for separate motion-detecting mechanisms for first- and second-order motion in human vision , 1994, Vision Research.

[20]  Masao Ohmi,et al.  The efficiency of the central and peripheral retina in driving human optokinetic nystagmus , 1984, Vision Research.

[21]  T Ledgeway.  The detection of second-order motion in the human visual system. , 1994 .

[22]  F. Campbell,et al.  The visual evoked potential as a function of contrast of a grating pattern , 1972, The Journal of physiology.

[23]  C. R. Michael.  Receptive fields of single optic nerve fibers in a mammal with an all-cone retina. 3. Opponent color units. , 1968, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  J. J. Koenderink,et al.  Illusory motion in visual displays , 1984, Vision Research.