The Electric Field and Waves Instruments on the Radiation Belt Storm Probes Mission

The Electric Fields and Waves (EFW) Instruments on the two Radiation Belt Storm Probe (RBSP) spacecraft (recently renamed the Van Allen Probes) are designed to measure three dimensional quasi-static and low frequency electric fields and waves associated with the major mechanisms responsible for the acceleration of energetic charged particles in the inner magnetosphere of the Earth. For this measurement, the instrument uses two pairs of spherical double probe sensors at the ends of orthogonal centripetally deployed booms in the spin plane with tip-to-tip separations of 100 meters. The third component of the electric field is measured by two spherical sensors separated by ∼15 m, deployed at the ends of two stacer booms oppositely directed along the spin axis of the spacecraft. The instrument provides a continuous stream of measurements over the entire orbit of the low frequency electric field vector at 32 samples/s in a survey mode. This survey mode also includes measurements of spacecraft potential to provide information on thermal electron plasma variations and structure. Survey mode spectral information allows the continuous evaluation of the peak value and spectral power in electric, magnetic and density fluctuations from several Hz to 6.5 kHz. On-board cross-spectral data allows the calculation of field-aligned wave Poynting flux along the magnetic field. For higher frequency waveform information, two different programmable burst memories are used with nominal sampling rates of 512 samples/s and 16 k samples/s. The EFW burst modes provide targeted measurements over brief time intervals of 3-d electric fields, 3-d wave magnetic fields (from the EMFISIS magnetic search coil sensors), and spacecraft potential. In the burst modes all six sensor-spacecraft potential measurements are telemetered enabling interferometric timing of small-scale plasma structures. In the first burst mode, the instrument stores all or a substantial fraction of the high frequency measurements in a 32 gigabyte burst memory. The sub-intervals to be downloaded are uplinked by ground command after inspection of instrument survey data and other information available on the ground. The second burst mode involves autonomous storing and playback of data controlled by flight software algorithms, which assess the “highest quality” events on the basis of instrument measurements and information from other instruments available on orbit. The EFW instrument provides 3-d wave electric field signals with a frequency response up to 400 kHz to the EMFISIS instrument for analysis and telemetry (Kletzing et al. Space Sci. Rev. 2013).

[1]  J. Blake,et al.  Observation of relativistic electron microbursts in conjunction with intense radiation belt whistler‐mode waves , 2011, 1101.3345.

[2]  F. Mozer,et al.  Experimental evidence on the role of the large spatial scale electric field in creating the ring current , 1998 .

[3]  R. D. Belian,et al.  Substorm injection of relativistic electrons to geosynchronous orbit during the great magnetic storm of March 24, 1991 , 2001 .

[4]  W. I. Axford.  Flow of mass and energy in the solar system , 1976 .

[5]  G. Marklund.  Viking investigations of auroral electrodynamical processes , 1993 .

[6]  J. Wygant,et al.  Dependence of the large-scale, inner magnetospheric electric field on geomagnetic activity , 1998 .

[7]  F. Mozer,et al.  Large amplitude electric and magnetic field signatures in the inner magnetosphere during injection of 15 MeV electron drift echoes , 1994 .

[8]  A. Vampola,et al.  electron drift echoes in the inner magnetosphere , 1992 .

[9]  R. Abiad,et al.  The FAST Satellite Fields Instrument , 2001 .

[10]  M. Hudson,et al.  Simulation of the prompt energization and transport of radiation belt particles during the March 24, 1991 SSC , 1993 .

[11]  Christopher Cully,et al.  THEMIS observations of long‐lived regions of large‐amplitude whistler waves in the inner magnetosphere , 2008 .

[12]  M. Hudson,et al.  Resonant enhancement of relativistic electron fluxes during geomagnetically active periods , 1999 .

[13]  W.K. (Bill) Peterson,et al.  Observed trends in auroral zone ion mode solitary wave structure characteristics using data from Polar , 2001 .

[14]  John R Wygant,et al.  The electric field instrument on the polar satellite , 1995 .

[15]  Vassilis Angelopoulos,et al.  The Electric Field Instrument (EFI) for THEMIS , 2008 .

[16]  M. Hudson,et al.  Radiation belt electron acceleration by ULF wave drift resonance: Simulation of 1997 and 1998 storms , 2013 .

[17]  K. R. Lorentzen,et al.  X‐ray observations of MeV electron precipitation with a balloon‐borne germanium spectrometer , 2002 .

[18]  A. Pedersen,et al.  Solar wind and magnetosphere plasma diagnostics by spacecraft electrostatic potential measurements , 1995 .

[19]  R. Denton,et al.  A study of Pc-5 ULF oscillations , 2004 .

[20]  J. B. Blake,et al.  Energization of relativistic electrons in the presence of ULF power and mev microbursts: Evidence for dual ULF and VLF acceleration , 2003 .

[21]  V. A. Marchenko,et al.  Simulations of radiation belt formation during storm sudden commencements , 1997 .

[22]  W. Kolasinski,et al.  Injection of electrons and protons with energies of tens of MeV into L < 3 on 24 March 1991. (Reannouncement with new availability information) , 1992 .

[23]  R. Lysak,et al.  Polar observations of solitary waves at high and low altitudes and comparison to theory , 2001 .

[24]  C. Cattell,et al.  Electron trapping and charge transport by large amplitude whistlers , 2010 .

[25]  Y. Omura,et al.  Ultra‐relativistic acceleration of electrons in planetary magnetospheres , 2007 .

[26]  J. Foster,et al.  Storm-time electric-field penetration observed at mid-latitude , 1991 .

[27]  A. Balogh,et al.  Cluster observations of surface waves in the ion jets from magnetotail reconnection , 2011 .

[28]  M. Acuna,et al.  Discovery of very large amplitude whistler‐mode waves in Earth's radiation belts , 2008 .

[29]  D. Brautigam,et al.  CRRES Electric Field Power Spectra and Radial Diffusion Coefficients , 2005 .

[30]  I. Dandouras,et al.  Electron density estimations derived from spacecraft potential measurements on Cluster in tenuous plasma regions , 2008 .

[31]  D. Baker,et al.  NEW HIGH TEMPORAL AND SPATIAL RESOLUTION MEASUREMENTS BY SAMPEX OF THE PRECIPITATION OF RELATIVISTIC ELECTRONS , 1996 .

[32]  Rickard N. Lundin,et al.  The Swedish Small Satellite Program for Space Plasma Investigations , 2004 .

[33]  Richard M. Thorne,et al.  Potential waves for relativistic electron scattering and stochastic acceleration during magnetic storms , 1998 .

[34]  M. Temerin,et al.  The dc and ac electric field, plasma density, plasma temperature, and field‐aligned current experiments on the S3‐3 satellite , 1979 .

[35]  D. Crawford,et al.  The Electric and Magnetic Field Instrument Suite and Integrated Science (EMFISIS) on RBSP , 2013 .

[36]  M. Hudson,et al.  Simulation of proton radiation belt formation during the March 24, 1991 SSC , 1995 .

[37]  D. Baker,et al.  Simulation of dispersionless injections and drift echoes of energetic electrons associated with substorms , 1998 .

[38]  John R Wygant,et al.  The properties of large amplitude whistler mode waves in the magnetosphere: Propagation and relationship with geomagnetic activity , 2011 .

[39]  F. Mozer,et al.  CRRES electric field/langmuir probe instrument , 1992 .

[40]  K. R. Lorentzen,et al.  Multisatellite observations of MeV ion injections during storms , 2002 .

[41]  M. Parrot,et al.  Spatio-temporal structure of storm-time chorus , 2003 .

[42]  F. Mozer.  Analyses of techniques for measuring DC and AC electric fields in the magnetosphere , 1973 .

[43]  Per-Arne Lindqvist,et al.  THE ELECTRIC FIELD AND WAVE EXPERIMENT FOR THE CLUSTER MISSION , 1997 .

[44]  J. Albert.  Gyroresonant interactions of radiation belt particles with a monochromatic electromagnetic wave , 2000 .