Automatic Urban Water-Body Detection and Segmentation From Sparse ALSM Data via Spatially Constrained Model-Driven Clustering

Identifying hydrological features is important for urban planning and disaster assessment. Data spatial resolution poses challenges in automatic processing. In this letter, we present a novel spatially constrained model-driven clustering method that automatically detects and delineates water bodies in an urban area using airborne laser swath mapping (ALSM) data and imagery. Our method analyzes the modality of the sparseness histogram to decide the existence of water body, followed by clustering. Using the sparseness, clusters are decided by selecting candidate sites. In the iteration of clustering process, new sites are recruited within a close spatial vicinity of the boundary sites. Experiments were conducted using data sets from the city of New Orleans. Our method demonstrated superior robustness regardless of the density of ALSM sample and data discrepancy and very competitive accuracy in comparison with manual tracing, with an overall accuracy above 98%.

[1]  David P. Helmbold,et al.  Aerial Lidar Data Classification using AdaBoost , 2007, Sixth International Conference on 3-D Digital Imaging and Modeling (3DIM 2007).

[2]  Saeid Sanei,et al.  Exploiting Sparsity, Sparseness and Super-Gaussianity in Underdetermined Blind Identification of Temporomandibular Joint Sounds , 2007, J. Comput..

[3]  W. Cohen,et al.  Integration of lidar and Landsat ETM+ data for estimating and mapping forest canopy height , 2002 .

[4]  Jacob T. Mundt,et al.  Mapping Sagebrush Distribution Using Fusion of Hyperspectral and Lidar Classifications , 2006 .

[5]  J. A. Allan,et al.  Satellite Remote Sensing: An Introduction , 1989 .

[6]  Lei Wang,et al.  Mapping detention basins and deriving their spatial attributes from airborne LiDAR data for hydrological applications , 2008 .

[7]  Patrick Matgen,et al.  Integration of SAR-derived river inundation areas, high-precision topographic data and a river flow model toward near real-time flood management , 2007, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[8]  P. Lohmann,et al.  Aspects of Lidar Processing in Coastal Areas , 2005 .

[9]  A. Brzank Classification of lidar data into water and land points in coastal areas , 2006 .

[10]  J. Brasington,et al.  Object-based land cover classification using airborne LiDAR , 2008 .

[11]  G. Schumann,et al.  Comparison of remotely sensed water stages from LiDAR, topographic contours and SRTM , 2008 .

[12]  Saiful Islam,et al.  Mahalanobis Distance , 2009, Encyclopedia of Biometrics.