Science, Technology, and the Imaginaries of Development in South Korea

The Korean studies literature consistently points out that science and technology have played an important role in the rapid socio-economic transformation of South Korea. But the emphasis in this literature is placed predominantly on their contributions to the nation’s industrial performance. Questions such as what type of policies and institutional reforms have been introduced to facilitate these contributions and how successful they have been are frequently asked. Science, technology, and development per se are, nevertheless, generally conceived as politically neutral and seldom interrogated. However, Korea has a long cultural tradition that envisions science and technology as tools for national empowerment. This instrumental view of science and technology has served as a crucial constitutive element of nationalist developmentalism that defines ‘advanced/developed’ and ‘backward/underdeveloped’ primarily in terms of industrialization and economic growth. In the South, it was under the Park Chung Hee regime that a more concrete form of nationalist developmentalism emerged and became firmly entrenched across the country. By reviewing the historical genealogy of the official and popular discourses of science, technology, and development in South Korea, the present paper traces how the nation’s prevailing conceptions of the meanings, purposes, and roles of science and technology have embedded and been embedded in distinctive ideas of nationhood and development.

[1]  Teresa Barrio Traspaderne Encountering Development: The Making and the Unmaking of the Third World , 2015 .

[2]  Andrzej Bolesta The developmental state , 2014 .

[3]  Sang‐Hyun Kim The Politics of Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research in South Korea: Contesting National Sociotechnical Imaginaries , 2014 .

[4]  Hee-Je Bak The Politics of Technoscience in Korea: From State Policy to Social Movement , 2014 .

[5]  S. Eriksson The technological state in Indonesia – the co-constitution of high technology and authoritarian politics , 2013 .

[6]  Allen Brodsky,et al.  Radiance of France: Nuclear Power and National Identity After World War II , 2010 .

[7]  Jina Chung Syngman Rhee Government’s three-year Economic Development Plan , 2009 .

[8]  G. Scott-Smith American hegemony and the postwar reconstruction of science in Europe , 2009 .

[9]  S. Jasanoff,et al.  Containing the Atom: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and Nuclear Power in the United States and South Korea , 2009 .

[10]  Hyungji Park The Making of Minjung: Democracy and the Politics of Representation in South Korea , 2009 .

[11]  E. Carlson :Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States , 2008 .

[12]  Amanda Bakale Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States by Sheila Jasanoff , 2008 .

[13]  J. Greene The Origins of the Developmental State in Taiwan , 2008 .

[14]  V. Tikhonov,et al.  The Korean Courtiers' Observation Mission's Views on Meiji Japan and Projects of Modern State Building , 2006 .

[15]  Linda F. Hogle,et al.  Recovering the Nation's Body: Cultural Memory, Medicine, and the Politics of Redemption , 1999 .

[16]  H. Fuess The Japanese empire in East Asia and its postwar legacy , 1999 .

[17]  J. Lie,et al.  Korea at the Turning Point: Innovation-Based Strategies for Development.@@@The State, Society and Big Business in South Korea. , 1998 .

[18]  S. Leslie,et al.  Winning Markets or Winning Nobel Prizes? Kaist and the Challenges of Late Industrialization , 1998, Osiris.

[19]  R. Kargon,et al.  Selling Silicon Valley: Frederick Terman's Model for Regional Advantage , 1996, Business History Review.

[20]  Dowan Ku THE STRUCTURAL CHANGE OF THE KOREAN ENVIRONMENTAL MOVENENT , 1996 .

[21]  Zong-Tae Bae,et al.  Performance and Adaptive Roles of the Government-supported Research Institute in South Korea , 1991 .

[22]  The Demise of a Developmentalist State? Neoconservative Reforms and Political Consequences in South Korea , 1988, State and Development.

[23]  Sang‐Hyun Kim Science and Technology: National Identity, Self-reliance, Technocracy and Biopolitics , 2016 .

[24]  Shin Kwang-yeong The Citizens ’ Movement in Korea , 2010 .

[25]  John E. Van Sant Science for the Empire: Scientific Nationalism in Modern Japan , 2010 .

[26]  Seong-Jun Kim Development of Science Rather Than Nation: Roles and Motives of Domestic Scientists in South Korea’s 1950s Nuclear Program , 2009 .

[27]  Mabel Sabogal,et al.  The Will to Improve: Governmentality, Development, and the Practice of Politics , 2009 .

[28]  Sung-Soo Song The Rise and Fall of “Scientification of All Nation Movement” , 2008 .

[29]  G. Brazinsky Nation Building in South Korea: Koreans, Americans, and the Making of a Democracy , 2007 .

[30]  B. Lee,et al.  Developmental dictatorship and the Park Chung-hee era : the shaping of modernity in the Republic of Korea , 2006 .

[31]  Hyung-A Kim Korea's Development Under Park Chung Hee: Rapid Industrialization, 1961-1979 , 2005 .

[32]  M. Moon Reappraisal of the Establishment of KIST: U.S. and Korea's Role , 2004 .

[33]  R. Avenhaus,et al.  Containing the atom , 2002 .

[34]  Nadia Abu El-Haj Facts on the ground : archaeological practice and territorial self-fashioning in Israeli society , 2002 .

[35]  Yun-Tae Kim,et al.  Neoliberalism and the decline of the developmental state , 1999 .

[36]  엄기용,et al.  연구신청서 동류평가에 관한 연구 : 한국과학재단을 중심으로 = A study on the peer review processes : focused on Korea science and engineering foundation(KOSEF) , 1998 .

[37]  Y. Ezrahi,et al.  The descent of Icarus : science and the transformation of contemporary democracy , 1990 .

[38]  Paul N. Okaru Power for development , 1989 .

[39]  M. Fishbein Inauguration address. , 1959, Mississippi Valley medical journal.