Perceptions and knowledge of preservice and inservice educators about early reading instruction

A major conclusion from research regarding children with poor reading performance is that early, systematic instruction in phonological awareness and phonics improves early reading and spelling skills and results in a reduction of the number of students who read below grade level. The purpose of this study was to examine the perceptions and knowledge of presevice and inservice educators about early reading instruction. The results indicated that these educators expressed positive attitudes toward explicit and implicit code instruction, with inservice educators more positive about explicit code instruction than preservice educators and preservice educators more positive about implicit code instruction. Preservice and inservice educators demonstrated limited knowledge of phonological awareness or terminology related to language structure and phonics. Additionally, they perceived themselves as only somewhat prepared to teach early reading to struggling readers. These findings indicate a continuing mismatch between what educators believe and know and what convergent research supports as effective early reading instruction for children at risk for reading difficulties. Implications support continuing efforts to inform and reform teacher education.

[1]  P. David Pearson.  Handbook of reading research. , 1990 .

[2]  Benita A. Blachman,et al.  Kindergarten teachers develop phoneme awareness in low-income, inner-city classrooms , 1994 .

[3]  L. Moats,et al.  Informed Instruction for Reading Success: Foundations for Teacher Preparation. , 1997 .

[4]  Rollanda E. O'Connor.  Teachers Learning Ladders to Literacy , 1999 .

[5]  C. Juel.  Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first through fourth grades. , 1988 .

[6]  Virginia W. Berninger,et al.  Those Who Know, Teach Well: Helping Teachers Master Literacy-Related Subject-Matter Knowledge , 1999 .

[7]  D. Langenberg.  Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction , 2000 .

[8]  Rollanda E. O'Connor,et al.  Transfer among Phonological Tasks in Kindergarten: Essential Instructional Content. , 1995 .

[9]  L. Moats,et al.  The missing foundation in teacher education: Knowledge of the structure of spoken and written language , 1994, Annals of dyslexia.

[10]  C. Bos,et al.  Implementing Interactive Professitonal Development In a Workshop Course on Educating Students with AD/HD , 1997 .

[11]  H. Yopp,et al.  Kindergarten Teachers' Knowledge of Emergent Literacy Concepts. , 1990 .

[12]  Joseph K. Torgesen,et al.  Individual Differences in Response to Early Interventions in Reading: The Lingering Problem of Treatment Resisters , 2000 .

[13]  R. Barr,et al.  Influence of Basal Programs on Fourth-Grade Reading Instruction. , 1989 .

[14]  J. Lerner.  Learning disabilities : theories, diagnosis, and teaching strategies / Janet W. Lerner , 1981 .

[15]  D. Francis,et al.  A Matthew effect for IQ but not for reading : results from a longitudinal study , 1995 .

[16]  Gerald G. Duffy,et al.  Conceptions of Reading Project. Final Report. , 1982 .

[17]  Jack M. Fletcher,et al.  Developmental Lag versus Deficit Models of Reading Disability: A Longitudinal, Individual Growth Curves Analysis. , 1996 .

[18]  D. Dillman.  Mail and telephone surveys : the total design method , 1979 .

[19]  Louisa Cook Moats,et al.  Whole Language Lives On: The Illusion of "Balanced" Reading Instruction. , 2000 .

[20]  Mark A. Smylie.  The Enhancement Function of Staff Development: Organizational and Psychological Antecedents to Individual Teacher Change , 1988 .

[21]  D. Deford,et al.  Validating the construct of theoretical orientation in reading instruction. , 1985 .

[22]  Rachel Friedman Narr,et al.  Interactive, Collaborative Professional Development in Early Literacy Instruction: Supporting the Balancing Act. , 1999 .

[23]  D. Chard,et al.  Phonics and Word Recognition Instruction in Early Reading Programs: Guidelines for Accessibility , 1999 .

[24]  T. Conway,et al.  Intensive Remedial Instruction for Children with Severe Reading Disabilities , 2001, Journal of learning disabilities.

[25]  R. Lyon.  The NICHD Research Program in Reading Development, Reading Disorders and Reading Instruction: A Summary of Research Findings. Keys to Successful Learning: A National Summit on Research in Learning Disabilities. , 1998 .

[26]  Deborah C. Simmons,et al.  General Education Teachers' Assumptions about Learning and Students with Learning Disabilities: Design-of-Instruction Analysis , 1998 .

[27]  Catherine E. Snow,et al.  Preventing reading difficulties in young children , 1998 .

[28]  N. Mather,et al.  Perceptions and Knowledge of Preservice and Inservice Teachers About Early Literacy Instruction , 2001, Journal of learning disabilities.

[29]  Edward R. Sipay,et al.  Cognitive profiles of difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers : Early intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as basic causes of specific Reading disability , 1996 .

[30]  Elazar J. Pedhazur,et al.  Measurement, Design, and Analysis: An Integrated Approach , 1994 .

[31]  R. Abbott,et al.  Beginning Literacy , 2002, Journal of learning disabilities.

[32]  T. Guskey.  Staff Development and the Process of Teacher Change , 1986 .

[33]  G. Glass,et al.  Statistical methods in education and psychology , 1970 .

[34]  Cathy Collins Block,et al.  A Study of Effective First-Grade Literacy Instruction , 2001 .

[35]  Joseph K. Torgesen,et al.  Longitudinal Studies of Phonological Processing and Reading , 1994, Journal of learning disabilities.

[36]  Susan S. Stodolsky,et al.  Teachers and Textbooks: Materials Use in Four Fourth-Grade Classrooms , 1993, The Elementary School Journal.

[37]  Gerald G. Duffy,et al.  Teaching Teachers to Teach Reading: Paradigm Shifts, Persistent Problems, and Challenges , 2000 .