A Circular Economy Toolkit as an Alternative to Improve the Application of PSS Methodologies

Abstract Circular Economy (CE) is an alternative to achieve more sustainability and to improve the current economic system through the transformation of the linear and semi-circular flows to circulate ones, keeping products at a higher level of utility and for a longer period of time. Ellen McArthur Foundation (EMF) and IDEO developed a Circular Design Guide (CE toolkit) intended to support companies to apply the circular principles on their own organizations. In this context, some authors noted that the development of a product-service system (PSS) initiative can help in the transition to a CE. The aim of this paper is to evaluate the objectives of the CE Toolkit joint with a PSS methodology already existent in literature. A matrix was applied to analyse the CE toolkit versus the PSS methodology, and a Likert scale was applied to characterize the relation between each stage of the methodology and each objective of the toolkit. The most important findings are related to the absence of CE concepts and its connection to PSS in previously existent methodology, which lacks methods to support the application of it, and lacks the incentive to use recovery techniques as recycling, remanufacturing and reuse of parts on PSS. At the same time, the toolkit lacks some practical aspects of the transition to PSS, such as identifying the competitors and the definition of a very detailed list of equipment and infrastructure required for the business.

[1]  Fabrizio Ceschin,et al.  Critical factors for implementing and diffusing sustainable product-Service systems: insights from innovation studies and companies' experiences , 2013 .

[2]  Yoshiki Shimomura,et al.  Development of the Design Guideline for Product-service Systems☆ , 2014 .

[3]  Samir Dani,et al.  Evaluating existing approaches to product‐service system design: A comparison with industrial practice , 2012 .

[4]  Jeffrey R. Alcock,et al.  Product–service systems in health care: case study of a drug–device combination , 2011 .

[5]  Oksana Mont,et al.  Clarifying the Concept of Product-Service System , 2002 .

[6]  A. Tukker,et al.  Product-services as a research field: past, present and future. Reflections from a decade of research , 2006 .

[7]  Yutaro Nemoto,et al.  Strategic Thinking in EDIPS: Edutainment for Designing Integrated Product-service System☆ , 2014 .

[8]  B. Mentink,et al.  Circular Business Model Innovation: A process framework and a tool for business model innovation in a circular economy , 2014 .

[9]  Arnold Tukker,et al.  Product services for a resource-efficient and circular economy - A review , 2015 .

[10]  Nicola Morelli,et al.  Product-service systems, a perspective shift for designers: A case study: the design of a telecentre , 2003 .

[11]  Ezio Manzini,et al.  Product-service systems: using an existing concept as a new approach to sustainability , 2001 .

[12]  Nicola Morelli,et al.  Designing Product/Service Systems: A Methodological Exploration1 , 2002, Design Issues.

[13]  Minna Halme,et al.  Sustainability evaluation of European household services , 2006 .

[14]  Fabio Nonino,et al.  Product service system: A conceptual framework from a systematic review , 2016 .

[15]  Tracy Bhamra,et al.  The transfer and application of Product Service Systems: from academia to UK manufacturing firms , 2006 .