The mediation of environmental assessment's influence: What role for power?

Abstract Considerable empirical research has been conducted on why policy tools such as environmental assessment (EA) often appear to have ‘little effect’ (after Weiss) on policy decisions. This article revisits this debate but looks at a mediating factor that has received limited attention to-date in the context of EA — political power. Using a tripartite analytical framework, a comparative analysis of the influence and significance of power in mediating environmental policy integration is undertaken. Power is analysed, albeit partially, through an exploration of institutions that underpin social order. Empirically, the research examines the case of a new approach to policy-level EA (essentially a form of Strategic Environmental Assessment) developed by the World Bank and its trial application to urban environmental governance and planning in Dhaka mega-city, Bangladesh. The research results demonstrate that power was intimately involved in mediating the influence of the policy EA approach, in both positive (enabling) and negative (constraining) ways. It is suggested that the policy EA approach was ultimately a manifestation of a corporate strategy to maintain the powerful position of the World Bank as a leading authority on international development which focuses on knowledge generation. Furthermore, as constitutive of an institution and reflecting the worldviews of its proponents, the development of a new approach to EA also represents a significant power play. This leads us to, firstly, emphasise the concepts of strategy and intentionality in theorising how and why EA tools are employed, succeed and fail; and secondly, reflect on the reasons why power has received such limited attention to-date in EA scholarship.

[1]  Tim Richardson,et al.  Power, knowledge and environmental assessment: the World Bank’s pursuit of ‘good governance’ , 2011 .

[2]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Organizational Learning: A Theory Of Action Perspective , 1978 .

[3]  M. Goldman.  Constructing an Environmental State: Eco-governmentality and other Transnational Practices of a ' Green' World Bank , 2001 .

[4]  T. O'riordan.  Environmental politics and policy processes , 2014 .

[5]  H. Blair.  Civil society and propoor initiatives in rural Bangladesh: finding a workable strategy , 2005 .

[6]  M. Haugaard.  Reflections on Seven Ways of Creating Power , 2003 .

[7]  Lars Emmelin,et al.  Evaluating the effectiveness of impact assessment instruments: Theorising the nature and implications of their political constitution , 2010 .

[8]  Christianne Coelho de Souza Reinisch Coelho,et al.  Informal knowledge processes: the underpinning for sustainability outcomes in EIA? , 2010 .

[9]  A. Bebbington,et al.  Of texts and practices: Empowerment and organisational cultures in world bank-funded rural development programmes , 2007 .

[10]  H. Davies,et al.  Using Evidence: How research can inform public services , 2007 .

[11]  Environmental integration in European Commission development co-operation programming: experiences in the use of country environmental profiles , 2007 .

[12]  P. Hall.  Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: the case of economic policymaking in Britain , 1993 .

[13]  G. Ángeles,et al.  Slums of urban Bangladesh: mapping and census 2005. , 2006 .

[14]  G. Brundtland,et al.  Our common future , 1987 .

[15]  H. Rittel,et al.  Dilemmas in a general theory of planning , 1973 .

[16]  Pierre Lascoumes,et al.  Introduction: Understanding Public Policy through Its Instruments—From the Nature of Instruments to the Sociology of Public Policy Instrumentation , 2007 .

[17]  A. S. Clair.  The World Bank as a Transnational Expertised Institution , 2006 .

[18]  J. Roberts,et al.  Greening Aid?: Understanding the Environmental Impact of Development Assistance , 2008 .

[19]  Sofie Storbjörk,et al.  Strategy making and power in environmental assessments. Lessons from the establishment of an out-of-town shopping centre in Västerås, Sweden , 2012 .

[20]  John Turnpenny,et al.  THE POLICY AND POLITICS OF POLICY APPRAISAL: EMERGING TRENDS AND NEW DIRECTIONS , 2009 .

[21]  D. North.  Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance: Economic performance , 1990 .

[22]  Åsa Persson.  Environmental policy integration and bilateral development assistance: challenges and opportunities with an evolving governance framework , 2009 .

[23]  William R. Sheate,et al.  Strategic approaches and assessment techniques: Potential for knowledge brokerage towards sustainability , 2010 .

[24]  Richard Cowell,et al.  Land and Limits: Interpreting Sustainability in the Planning Process , 2001 .

[25]  Andrew Jordan,et al.  The Governance of Sustainable Development: Taking Stock and Looking Forwards , 2008 .

[26]  Alan Bond,et al.  An investigation of environmental and sustainability discourses associated with the substantive purposes of environmental assessment , 2012 .

[27]  B. Flyvbjerg.  RATIONALITY AND POWER: DEMOCRACY IN PRACTICE , 1999 .

[28]  Robin Broad.  Research, knowledge, and the art of ‘paradigm maintenance’: the World Bank's Development Economics Vice-Presidency (DEC) , 2006 .

[29]  Matthew Asa Cashmore,et al.  DECISION-ORIENTED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF ITS THEORY AND METHODS , 2006 .

[30]  François Molle,et al.  Nirvana concepts, narratives and policy models : insights from the water sector , 2008 .

[31]  B. Flyvbjerg,et al.  Megaprojects and Risk: An Anatomy of Ambition , 2003 .

[32]  Matthew Asa Cashmore,et al.  The role of science in environmental impact assessment: process and procedure versus purpose in the development of theory , 2004 .

[33]  A. Jordan,et al.  Environmental policy integration: a state of the art review , 2010 .

[34]  Mark Haugaard,et al.  Power: A reader , 2002 .

[35]  John Turnpenny,et al.  The Politics of Sustainable Development in UK Government: What Role for Integrated Policy Appraisal? , 2009 .

[36]  Tim Rayner,et al.  ‘When knowledge matters’: the role and influence of the Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution , 1999 .

[37]  Andrew Jordan,et al.  The Coordination of the European Union: Exploring the Capacities of Networked Governance , 2007 .

[38]  A. Ekbom,et al.  Policy SEA: lessons from development co-operation , 2012 .

[39]  Tania M. Li,et al.  The Will To Improve: Governmentality, Development, and the Practice of Politics Tania Murray Li , 2008 .