Deep learning for industrial processes: Forecasting amine emissions from a carbon capture plant
暂无分享,去创建一个
B. Smit | P. Moser | K. Jablonka | Juliana Monteiro | G. Wiechers | S. Garcia | C. Charalambous | E. Sanchez Fernandez
[1] J. Monteiro,et al. Process Integration of Advanced Amine-based Solvents in Power and Industrial Plants: A New Benchmark for Post-combustion Carbon Capture? , 2021 .
[2] A. Huizinga,et al. Analysis of flexible operation of CO2 capture plants: Predicting solvent emissions from conventional and advanced amine systems , 2021, SSRN Electronic Journal.
[3] B. Smit,et al. Bias free multiobjective active learning for materials design and discovery , 2020, Nature Communications.
[4] Kaiqi Jiang,et al. An update of the benchmark post-combustion CO2-capture technology , 2020 .
[5] Jaime Fern'andez del R'io,et al. Array programming with NumPy , 2020, Nature.
[6] P. Moser,et al. Results of the 18-month test with MEA at the post-combustion capture pilot plant at Niederaussem – new impetus to solvent management, emissions and dynamic behaviour , 2020 .
[7] Thomas de Cazenove,et al. Demonstrating flexible operation of the Technology Centre Mongstad (TCM) CO2 capture plant , 2020 .
[8] Hugh Chen,et al. From local explanations to global understanding with explainable AI for trees , 2020, Nature Machine Intelligence.
[9] Joel Nothman,et al. SciPy 1.0-Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python , 2019, ArXiv.
[10] Turab Lookman,et al. Active learning in materials science with emphasis on adaptive sampling using uncertainties for targeted design , 2019, npj Computational Materials.
[11] Solomon F. Brown,et al. Carbon capture and storage (CCS): the way forward , 2018 .
[12] Vladlen Koltun,et al. An Empirical Evaluation of Generic Convolutional and Recurrent Networks for Sequence Modeling , 2018, ArXiv.
[13] Tie-Yan Liu,et al. LightGBM: A Highly Efficient Gradient Boosting Decision Tree , 2017, NIPS.
[14] Robin Irons,et al. Understanding Solvent Degradation: A Study from Three Different Pilot Plants within the OCTAVIUS Project , 2017 .
[15] Magne Hillestad,et al. Dynamic simulation of post-combustion CO2 capture for flexible operation of the Brindisi pilot plant , 2016 .
[16] Magne Hillestad,et al. Dominating dynamics of the post-combustion CO2 absorption process , 2016, Comput. Chem. Eng..
[17] Tim Salimans,et al. Weight Normalization: A Simple Reparameterization to Accelerate Training of Deep Neural Networks , 2016, NIPS.
[18] Jian Sun,et al. Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition , 2015, 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).
[19] Zoubin Ghahramani,et al. Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learning , 2015, ICML.
[20] et al.,et al. Jupyter Notebooks - a publishing format for reproducible computational workflows , 2016, ELPUB.
[21] A. Huizinga,et al. Real-Time Process Monitoring of CO2 Capture by Aqueous AMP-PZ Using Chemometrics: Pilot Plant Demonstration , 2015 .
[22] P. Khakharia,et al. Understanding aerosol based emissions in a Post Combustion CO2 Capture process: Parameter testing and mechanisms , 2015 .
[23] Steven L. Scott,et al. Inferring causal impact using Bayesian structural time-series models , 2015, 1506.00356.
[24] Jimmy Ba,et al. Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization , 2014, ICLR.
[25] John Bagterp Jørgensen,et al. Control of a post-combustion CO2 capture plant during process start-up and load variations , 2015 .
[26] Mai Bui,et al. Dynamic modelling and optimisation of flexible operation in post-combustion CO2 capture plants - A review , 2014, Comput. Chem. Eng..
[27] Peter Moser,et al. Demonstrating Emission Reduction – Results from the Post-combustion Capture Pilot Plant at Niederaussem , 2014 .
[28] Nitish Srivastava,et al. Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting , 2014, J. Mach. Learn. Res..
[29] Jan Mertens,et al. Understanding ethanolamine (MEA) and ammonia emissions from amine based post combustion carbon capture: Lessons learned from field tests , 2013 .
[30] K. A. Hoff,et al. Emissions from CO2 capture plants; an overview☆ , 2013 .
[31] Paul Feron,et al. Towards commercial scale postcombustion capture of CO2 with monoethanolamine solvent: key considerations for solvent management and environmental impacts. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.
[32] H. Hasse,et al. Pilot plant study of two new solvents for post combustion carbon dioxide capture by reactive absorption and comparison to monoethanolamine , 2011 .
[33] Gary T. Rochelle,et al. Aqueous piperazine as the new standard for CO2 capture technology , 2011 .
[34] Peter Moser,et al. Performance of MEA in a long-term test at the post-combustion capture pilot plant in Niederaussem , 2011 .
[35] Gaël Varoquaux,et al. Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python , 2011, J. Mach. Learn. Res..
[36] Peter Moser,et al. Investigation of trace elements in the inlet and outlet streams of a MEA-based post-combustion capture process results from the test programme at the Niederaussem pilot plant , 2011 .
[37] Edgar G Hertwich,et al. Human and environmental impact assessment of postcombustion CO2 capture focusing on emissions from amine-based scrubbing solvents to air. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.
[38] Skipper Seabold,et al. Statsmodels: Econometric and Statistical Modeling with Python , 2010, SciPy.
[39] Wes McKinney,et al. Data Structures for Statistical Computing in Python , 2010, SciPy.
[40] Matthew Leach,et al. Valuing flexible operation of power plants with CO2 capture , 2009 .
[41] John D. Hunter,et al. Matplotlib: A 2D Graphics Environment , 2007, Computing in Science & Engineering.
[42] Ignacio E. Grossmann,et al. Systematic Methods of Chemical Process Design , 1997 .