Deep learning for industrial processes: Forecasting amine emissions from a carbon capture plant

One of the main environmental impacts of amine-based carbon capture processes is the emission of the solvent and degradation products into the atmosphere. To mimic the mounting importance of intermittent operations of power plants we performed a stress test in which we measured the amine emissions from a pilot plant that has been in operation using a mixture of amines (CESAR1) in a slipstream from a coal-fired power plant. Understanding how changes in the operation far from the steady-state of the plant affect the emissions is key to designing emission mitigation strategies. However, conventional process modelling techniques struggle to capture the full dynamic, multivariate, and non-linear nature of this data. In this work, we report how a data-intensive approach can be used to learn the mapping between process and emissions from data. The resulting model can forecast the emissions, can be used to analyse the data and also perform in silico stress tests. By doing so, we reveal that emission mitigation strategies that work well for single component solvents (e.g. monoethanolamine) need to be revised for a mixture of solvents such as CESAR1. We expect that the combination of large amounts of data with flexible learning algorithms will impact the way we design and operate industrial processes, as we can now harvest information at conditions where conventional approaches fail.

[1]  J. Monteiro,et al.  Process Integration of Advanced Amine-based Solvents in Power and Industrial Plants: A New Benchmark for Post-combustion Carbon Capture? , 2021 .

[2]  A. Huizinga,et al.  Analysis of flexible operation of CO2 capture plants: Predicting solvent emissions from conventional and advanced amine systems , 2021, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[3]  B. Smit,et al.  Bias free multiobjective active learning for materials design and discovery , 2020, Nature Communications.

[4]  Kaiqi Jiang,et al.  An update of the benchmark post-combustion CO2-capture technology , 2020 .

[5]  Jaime Fern'andez del R'io,et al.  Array programming with NumPy , 2020, Nature.

[6]  P. Moser,et al.  Results of the 18-month test with MEA at the post-combustion capture pilot plant at Niederaussem – new impetus to solvent management, emissions and dynamic behaviour , 2020 .

[7]  Thomas de Cazenove,et al.  Demonstrating flexible operation of the Technology Centre Mongstad (TCM) CO2 capture plant , 2020 .

[8]  Hugh Chen,et al.  From local explanations to global understanding with explainable AI for trees , 2020, Nature Machine Intelligence.

[9]  Joel Nothman,et al.  SciPy 1.0-Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python , 2019, ArXiv.

[10]  Turab Lookman,et al.  Active learning in materials science with emphasis on adaptive sampling using uncertainties for targeted design , 2019, npj Computational Materials.

[11]  Solomon F. Brown,et al.  Carbon capture and storage (CCS): the way forward , 2018 .

[12]  Vladlen Koltun,et al.  An Empirical Evaluation of Generic Convolutional and Recurrent Networks for Sequence Modeling , 2018, ArXiv.

[13]  Tie-Yan Liu,et al.  LightGBM: A Highly Efficient Gradient Boosting Decision Tree , 2017, NIPS.

[14]  Robin Irons,et al.  Understanding Solvent Degradation: A Study from Three Different Pilot Plants within the OCTAVIUS Project , 2017 .

[15]  Magne Hillestad,et al.  Dynamic simulation of post-combustion CO2 capture for flexible operation of the Brindisi pilot plant , 2016 .

[16]  Magne Hillestad,et al.  Dominating dynamics of the post-combustion CO2 absorption process , 2016, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[17]  Tim Salimans,et al.  Weight Normalization: A Simple Reparameterization to Accelerate Training of Deep Neural Networks , 2016, NIPS.

[18]  Jian Sun,et al.  Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition , 2015, 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[19]  Zoubin Ghahramani,et al.  Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learning , 2015, ICML.

[20]  et al.,et al.  Jupyter Notebooks - a publishing format for reproducible computational workflows , 2016, ELPUB.

[21]  A. Huizinga,et al.  Real-Time Process Monitoring of CO2 Capture by Aqueous AMP-PZ Using Chemometrics: Pilot Plant Demonstration , 2015 .

[22]  P. Khakharia,et al.  Understanding aerosol based emissions in a Post Combustion CO2 Capture process: Parameter testing and mechanisms , 2015 .

[23]  Steven L. Scott,et al.  Inferring causal impact using Bayesian structural time-series models , 2015, 1506.00356.

[24]  Jimmy Ba,et al.  Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization , 2014, ICLR.

[25]  John Bagterp Jørgensen,et al.  Control of a post-combustion CO2 capture plant during process start-up and load variations , 2015 .

[26]  Mai Bui,et al.  Dynamic modelling and optimisation of flexible operation in post-combustion CO2 capture plants - A review , 2014, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[27]  Peter Moser,et al.  Demonstrating Emission Reduction – Results from the Post-combustion Capture Pilot Plant at Niederaussem , 2014 .

[28]  Nitish Srivastava,et al.  Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting , 2014, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[29]  Jan Mertens,et al.  Understanding ethanolamine (MEA) and ammonia emissions from amine based post combustion carbon capture: Lessons learned from field tests , 2013 .

[30]  K. A. Hoff,et al.  Emissions from CO2 capture plants; an overview☆ , 2013 .

[31]  Paul Feron,et al.  Towards commercial scale postcombustion capture of CO2 with monoethanolamine solvent: key considerations for solvent management and environmental impacts. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[32]  H. Hasse,et al.  Pilot plant study of two new solvents for post combustion carbon dioxide capture by reactive absorption and comparison to monoethanolamine , 2011 .

[33]  Gary T. Rochelle,et al.  Aqueous piperazine as the new standard for CO2 capture technology , 2011 .

[34]  Peter Moser,et al.  Performance of MEA in a long-term test at the post-combustion capture pilot plant in Niederaussem , 2011 .

[35]  Gaël Varoquaux,et al.  Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python , 2011, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[36]  Peter Moser,et al.  Investigation of trace elements in the inlet and outlet streams of a MEA-based post-combustion capture process results from the test programme at the Niederaussem pilot plant , 2011 .

[37]  Edgar G Hertwich,et al.  Human and environmental impact assessment of postcombustion CO2 capture focusing on emissions from amine-based scrubbing solvents to air. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[38]  Skipper Seabold,et al.  Statsmodels: Econometric and Statistical Modeling with Python , 2010, SciPy.

[39]  Wes McKinney,et al.  Data Structures for Statistical Computing in Python , 2010, SciPy.

[40]  Matthew Leach,et al.  Valuing flexible operation of power plants with CO2 capture , 2009 .

[41]  John D. Hunter,et al.  Matplotlib: A 2D Graphics Environment , 2007, Computing in Science & Engineering.

[42]  Ignacio E. Grossmann,et al.  Systematic Methods of Chemical Process Design , 1997 .