The development of Scotland’s Curriculum for Excellence: amnesia and déjà vu

Scotland’s new Curriculum for Excellence (CfE) has been widely acknowledged as the most significant educational development in a generation, with the potential to transform learning and teaching in Scottish schools. In common with recent developments elsewhere, CfE seeks to re‐engage teachers with processes of curriculum development, to place learning at the heart of the curriculum and to change engrained practices of schooling. This article draws upon well‐established curriculum theory (notably the work of both Lawrence Stenhouse and A.V. Kelly) to analyse the new curriculum. We argue that by neglecting to take account of such theory, the curricular offering proposed by CfE is subject to a number of significant structural contradictions which may affect the impact that it ultimately exerts on learning and teaching; in effect, by ignoring the lessons of the past, CfE runs the risk of undermining the potential for real change.

[1]  Gert Biesta,et al.  Beyond Learning: Democratic Education for a Human Future , 2015 .

[2]  G. Biesta.  Good education in an age of measurement: on the need to reconnect with the question of purpose in education , 2009 .

[3]  J. Reeves.  Between a Rock and a Hard Place? Curriculum for Excellence and the Quality Initiative in Scottish Schools , 2008, Scottish Educational Review.

[4]  R. Edwards.  Education - an Impossible Practice? , 2008, Scottish Educational Review.

[5]  R. Teese,et al.  Quality and Equity of Schooling in Scotland , 2007 .

[6]  Gert Biesta,et al.  How is agency possible? Towards an ecological understanding of agency-as-achievement , 2006 .

[7]  P. Munn,et al.  POLICY-MAKING IN SCOTTISH EDUCATION , 2005 .

[8]  Louise Hayward,et al.  The journey so far: assessment for learning in Scotland , 2005 .

[9]  A. Kelly.  The Curriculum. Theory and Practice. Fifth Edition. , 2004 .

[10]  G. Stobart,et al.  Evaluation of Project 1 of the Assessment is for Learning Development Programme: Support for Professional Practice in Formative Assessment: Interim Report , 2003 .

[11]  G. Stobart,et al.  Interim Report of the Evaluation of Project 1 of the Assessment is for Learning Development Programme: Support for Professional Practice in Formative Assessment , 2003 .

[12]  R. Birkelund.  Ethics and Education , 2000, Nursing ethics.

[13]  K. Shaw,et al.  The Curriculum: theory and practice (4th edition) , 2000 .

[14]  Harry Torrance.  Assessment, Accountability, and Standards: Using Assessment to Control the Reform of Schooling , 1997 .

[15]  I. Goodson,et al.  Studying School Subjects: A Guide , 1996 .

[16]  Terry Hyland.  Competence, Education and Nvqs: Dissenting Perspectives , 1995 .

[17]  A. Wolf.  Competence-Based Assessment , 1995 .

[18]  A. M. White.  The Process of Education , 1994 .

[19]  G. Jessup.  Outcomes: Nvqs And The Emerging Model Of Education And Training , 1991 .

[20]  A. Kelly.  The National Curriculum: A Critical Review , 1990 .

[21]  D. Lawton.  Education, Culture and the National Curriculum , 1989 .

[22]  A. Kelly,et al.  Knowledge and Curriculum Planning , 1986 .

[23]  J. F. Soltis.  Knowledge and the Curriculum , 1979, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[24]  P. Hirst,et al.  Knowledge and the Curriculum , 1977 .

[25]  A. Kelly.  The Curriculum: Theory and Practice , 1977 .

[26]  R. Pring.  Knowledge and schooling , 1976 .

[27]  L. Stenhouse.  An introduction to curriculum research and development , 1975 .

[28]  D. Lawton.  Class, culture and the curriculum , 1976 .

[29]  Robert Sommer,et al.  Experience and Education. , 1974 .

[30]  E. Dale.  Waste in Education , 1969 .

[31]  William B. Borgers.  DEMOCRACY AND EDUCATION. , 1919 .