The Rise and Fall of Radical Civil Service Reform in the U.S. States

Initiated by a 1996 Georgia statute, “radical” civil service reform quickly swept the United States. This article explains the wax and eventual wane of state efforts to increase the number of at-will employees at the expense of the population of fully protected merit system employees. Using an event history approach to explain this policy diffusion with state-level variables, the author shows that electoral competition and gubernatorial powers are the most significant determinants of this kind of policy diffusion. Whereas previous literature concluded that these reforms ceased spreading because the new programs were failing to create the promised governmental efficiency, this article argues that the institutional conditions for these human resource management policies have been less propitious in recent years. The article signifies an important contribution in that it brings civil service reform back into the scope of policy diffusion literature and identifies political insights into a perpetually important question.

[1]  C. Hood A PUBLIC MANAGEMENT FOR ALL SEASONS , 1991 .

[2]  Frederick J. Boehmke,et al.  Policy Emulation or Policy Convergence? Potential Ambiguities in the Dyadic Event History Approach to State Policy Emulation , 2009, The Journal of Politics.

[3]  J. Kellough,et al.  Personnel Reform in the States: A Look at Progress Fifteen Years after the Winter Commission , 2008 .

[4]  Stephen E. Condrey Reinventing State Civil Service Systems , 2002 .

[5]  R. Maranto Thinking the Unthinkable in Public Administration , 1998 .

[6]  David R. Mayhew Divided we govern : party control, lawmaking, and investigations, 1946-1990 , 1992 .

[7]  Governmental Economic Intervention and the Merit System , 1977 .

[8]  Michael M. Ting,et al.  Elections and reform: The adoption of civil service systems in the U.S. states , 2013 .

[9]  F. Boehmke Approaches to Modeling the Adoption and Diffusion of Policies with Multiple Components , 2009, State Politics & Policy Quarterly.

[10]  Geoffrey T. Blodgett,et al.  Outlawing the Spoils: A History of the Civil Service Reform Movement, 1865- 1883. , 1962 .

[11]  Charles R. Shipan,et al.  The mechanisms of policy diffusion , 2008 .

[12]  R. Michael Alvarez,et al.  Event History Modeling: A Guide for Social Scientists , 2004 .

[13]  J. West,et al.  American Public Service: Radical Reform and the Merit System , 2006 .

[14]  J. P. Rui,et al.  Electoral Competition, Political Uncertainty, and Policy Insulation , 2001, American Political Science Review.

[15]  McNollgast The Political Origins of the Administrative Procedure Act , 1999 .

[16]  Jerrell D. Coggburn,et al.  State Government Human Resource Professionals’ Commitment to Employment at Will , 2010 .

[17]  J. Kellough,et al.  Civil Service Reform in Georgia , 2000 .

[18]  William D. Berry,et al.  Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the American States , 1998 .

[19]  J. Kellough,et al.  Civil Service Reform in the States: Personnel Policy and Politics at the Subnational Level , 2006 .

[20]  A. Karch Democratic Laboratories: Policy Diffusion among the American States , 2007 .

[21]  Pamela S. Tolbert,et al.  Institutional Sources of Change in the Formal Structure of Organizations: The Diffusion of Civil Service Reform, 1880-1935 , 1983 .

[22]  Van Riper,et al.  History of the United States civil service , 1959 .

[23]  Jay M. Shafritz,et al.  Classics of public administration , 1987 .

[24]  J. West,et al.  Ending Civil Service Protections in Florida Government , 2006 .

[25]  William D. Berry,et al.  Innovation and Diffusion Models in Policy Research , 2019, Theories of the Policy Process.

[26]  Virginia Gray and David Lowery,et al.  The Population Ecology of Interest Representation , 1996 .

[27]  S. Skowronek,et al.  Power and Society: Greater New York at the Turn of the Century@@@Building a New American State: The Expansion of National Administrative Capacities, 1877-1920 , 1984 .

[28]  Carl E. Klarner The Measurement of the Partisan Balance of State Government , 2003, State Politics & Policy Quarterly.

[29]  F. Boehmke,et al.  State Policy Innovativeness Revisited , 2012, State Politics & Policy Quarterly.

[30]  H. Kaufman,et al.  Emerging Conflicts in the Doctrines of Public Administration , 1956, American Political Science Review.

[31]  R. V. Bergh,et al.  The University of Chicago The Booth School of Business of the University of Chicago The University of Chicago Law School The Political Economy of State ‐ Level Administrative Procedure Acts , 2004 .

[32]  Dennis L. Dresang Diffusion of Civil Service Reform: the Federal and State Governments , 1982 .

[33]  Anirudh V. S. Ruhil,et al.  Urban Armageddon or Politics as Usual? The Case of Municipal Civil Service Reform , 2003 .

[34]  P. French,et al.  Assessing the Temporary Use of At-will Employment for Reorganization and Workforce Reduction in Mississippi State Government , 2011 .

[35]  Charles R. Shipan,et al.  Policy Diffusion: Seven Lessons for Scholars and Practitioners , 2012 .

[36]  Stephen E. Condrey,et al.  A Return to Spoils? Revisiting Radical Civil Service Reform in the United States , 2007 .

[37]  Stephen E. Condrey,et al.  Radical reform of the civil service , 2001 .

[38]  J. Bowman,et al.  Civil Service Reform, At-Will Employment, and George Santayana: Are We Condemned to Repeat the Past? , 2007 .

[39]  R. Elgie What Is Divided Government , 2001 .

[40]  Nathaniel Beck,et al.  Taking Time Seriously: Time-Series-Cross-Section Analysis with a Binary Dependent Variable , 1998 .

[41]  A. Ruhil,et al.  What Lies Beneath: The Political Roots of State Merit Systems , 2003 .

[42]  Charles W. Gossett Civil Service Reform , 2002 .

[43]  Robert E. Forbis,et al.  On the Ethics of At-Will Employment in the Public Sector , 2006 .

[44]  J. Snyder,et al.  Patronage and Elections in U.S. States , 2011, American Political Science Review.

[45]  Frederick J. Boehmke,et al.  Potential Ambiguities in a Directed Dyad Approach to State Policy Emulation. , 2007 .

[46]  Arthur L. Dakyns,et al.  Democracy and the Public Service , 1935 .

[47]  David R. Mayhew Divided We Govern , 1991 .

[48]  William D. Berry,et al.  State Lottery Adoptions as Policy Innovations: An Event History Analysis , 1990, American Political Science Review.

[49]  Christopher Pollitt,et al.  Managerialism and the Public Services: Cuts or Cultural Change in the 1990S? , 1993 .

[50]  K. Meier Reforming Bureaucracy: The Politics of Institutional Choice , 1988, American Political Science Review.

[51]  F. Boehmke The Initiative Process and the Dynamics of State Interest Group Populations , 2008, State Politics & Policy Quarterly.

[52]  M. Finnsdóttir,et al.  [Study in administration]. , 1972, Timarit Hjukrunarfelags Islands.

[53]  Keith Krehbiel,et al.  Pivotal Politics: A Theory of U.S. Lawmaking , 1998 .