Background: Responses to the chronic disease epidemic have predominantly been standardized in their approach to date. Barriers to better health outcomes remain, and effective management requires patient-specific data and disease state knowledge be presented in methods that foster clinical decision-making and patient self-management. Mobile technology provides a new platform for data collection and patient-provider communication. The mobile device represents a personalized platform that is available to the patient on a 24/7 basis. Mobile-integrated therapy (MIT) is the convergence of mobile technology, clinical and behavioral science, and scientifically validated clinical outcomes. In this article, we highlight the lessons learned from functional integration of a Food and Drug Administration-cleared type 2 diabetes MIT into the electronic health record (EHR) of a multiphysician practice within a large, urban, academic medical center. Methods: In-depth interviews were conducted with integration stakeholder groups: Mobile and EHR software and information technology teams, clinical end users, project managers, and business analysts. Interviews were summarized and categorized into lessons learned using the Architecture for Integrated Mobility® framework. Results: Findings from the diverse stakeholder group of a MIT-EHR integration project indicate that user workflow, software system persistence, environment configuration, device connectivity and security, organizational processes, and data exchange heuristics are key issues that must be addressed. Conclusions: Mobile-integrated therapy that integrates patient self-management data with medical record data provides the opportunity to understand the potential benefits of bidirectional data sharing and reporting that are most valuable in advancing better health and better care in a cost-effective way that is scalable for all chronic diseases.
[1]
E H Wagner,et al.
Chronic disease management: what will it take to improve care for chronic illness?
,
1998,
Effective clinical practice : ECP.
[2]
N. P. Napalkov,et al.
for the prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases
,
1999
.
[3]
C. Quinn,et al.
WellDoc mobile diabetes management randomized controlled trial: change in clinical and behavioral outcomes and patient and physician satisfaction.
,
2008,
Diabetes technology & therapeutics.
[4]
J. Cromwell,et al.
Results of the Medicare Health Support disease-management pilot program.
,
2011,
The New England journal of medicine.
[5]
W. Nilsen,et al.
Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task?
,
2011,
Translational behavioral medicine.
[6]
C. Quinn,et al.
Cluster-Randomized Trial of a Mobile Phone Personalized Behavioral Intervention for Blood Glucose Control
,
2011,
Diabetes Care.
[7]
Richard J. Katz,et al.
Lessons From a Community-Based mHealth Diabetes Self-Management Program: “It's Not Just About the Cell Phone”
,
2012,
Journal of health communication.
[8]
R. Saunders,et al.
Best Care at Lower Cost: The Path to Continuously Learning Health Care in America
,
2013
.
[9]
CC Quinn,et al.
Cluster-randomized trial of a mobile phone personalized behavioral intervention for blood glucose control. Diabetes Care 2011;34:1934–1942
,
2013,
Diabetes Care.
[10]
Ali K. Yetisen,et al.
Mobile Medical Applications
,
2015
.