The unfolding mystery of the numbers: First and second digits based comparative tests and its application to Ghana’s elections

This study focuses on the use of digits-based test in anomaly detection in presidential elections in Ghana. Even though Ghana has conducted several successful elections to elect presidents, the outcomes of the elections have been challenged in courts on allegations of vote rigging and fraud. It has been established in the literature that for an election to be anomaly free, the following should be satisfied: the distribution of voters turn-out, the winners’ share and total valid votes cast in the election should be uni-modal. Therefore, we assess the applicability of both first and second digits-based tests to aid in the detection of possible anomaly in the 2016 and 2020 presidential election results data in Ghana. The Benford frequency distribution and Spearman rank correlation coefficient tests were used for the analysis of data obtained from the Electoral Commission of Ghana. The results show that the observed first digits distributions of valid vote counts for both New Patriotic Party (NPP) and National Democratic Congress (NDC), and the total valid votes cast (TVVC), in 2016 and 2020 are consistent with the distributional pattern of first digits postulated by Benford’s Law. However, the findings of the distribution of second digits of the valid vote counts for NPP and total valid vote cast in both 2016 and 2020 elections do not satisfy the probability distributional pattern of second digits according to the Benford’s Law. In view of these, we recommend using the first two digits-based tests to check for consistency of possible election anomaly between the first and second digits since it conveys more information.

[1]  R. Minkah,et al.  Bayesian Estimation of Presidential Elections in Ghana: A Validation Approach , 2022, African Journal of Applied Statistics.

[2]  L. Miclea,et al.  Analyzing Benford’s Law’s Powerful Applications in Image Forensics , 2021, Applied Sciences.

[3]  W. Olatokun,et al.  Application of digits based test to analyse presidential election data in Nigeria , 2020 .

[4]  Neil Ketchley Fraud in the 2018 Egyptian presidential election? , 2019, Mediterranean Politics.

[5]  Micha Kaiser Benford'S Law as an Indicator of Survey Reliability—Can We Trust Our Data? , 2019, Journal of Economic Surveys.

[6]  W. J. Reed,et al.  Assessing Conformance with Benford’s Law: Goodness-Of-Fit Tests and Simultaneous Confidence Intervals , 2016, PloS one.

[7]  M. Bader,et al.  What explains regional variation in election fraud? Evidence from Russia: a research note , 2015 .

[8]  Arben Asllani,et al.  Using Benford¡¯s Law for Fraud Detection in Accounting Practices , 2014 .

[9]  Dorina Bërdufi,et al.  Statistical Detection of Vote Count Fraud (2009 Albanian Parliamentary Election and Benford’s Law) , 2014 .

[10]  Nils B. Weidmann,et al.  Violence and Election Fraud: Evidence from Afghanistan , 2012, British Journal of Political Science.

[11]  Peter C. Ordeshook,et al.  Benford's Law and the Detection of Election Fraud , 2011, Political Analysis.

[12]  Christian Breunig,et al.  Searching for Electoral Irregularities in an Established Democracy: Applying Benford’s Law Tests to Bundestag Elections in Unified Germany , 2011 .

[13]  Anton K. Formann,et al.  The Newcomb-Benford Law in Its Relation to Some Common Distributions , 2010, PloS one.

[14]  Walter R. Mebane,et al.  Fraud in the 2009 Presidential Election in Iran? , 2010 .

[15]  Lucas Lacasa,et al.  The first-digit frequencies of prime numbers and Riemann zeta zeros , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[16]  Boudewijn F. Roukema,et al.  A first-digit anomaly in the 2009 Iranian presidential election , 2009, 0906.2789.

[17]  George G. Judge,et al.  Detecting Problems in Survey Data Using Benford’s Law , 2007, The Journal of Human Resources.

[18]  Charles C. Moul,et al.  The Political Economy of Numbers: On the Application of Benford's Law to International Macroeconomic Statistics , 2007 .

[19]  Andreas Diekmann,et al.  Not the First Digit! Using Benford's Law to Detect Fraudulent Scientif ic Data , 2007 .

[20]  David J. Hand,et al.  Statistical fraud detection: A review , 2002 .

[21]  Alessandro Vespignani,et al.  Explaining the uneven distribution of numbers in nature: the laws of Benford and Zipf , 2001 .

[22]  Mark J. Nigrini,et al.  Adding value with digital analysis , 1999 .

[23]  R. Jeffries THE GHANAIAN ELECTIONS OF 1996: TOWARDS THE CONSOLIDATION OF DEMOCRACY? , 1998 .

[24]  M. Nigrini,et al.  The Use of Benford's Law as an Aid in Analytical Procedures , 1997 .

[25]  Simon Newcomb,et al.  Note on the Frequency of Use of the Different Digits in Natural Numbers , 1881 .