Measuring the Perceived Semantic Quality of Information Models

Semantic quality expresses the degree of correspondence between the information conveyed by a model and the domain that is modelled. As an early quality indicator of the system that implements the model, semantic quality must be evaluated before proceeding to implementation. Current evaluation approaches are based on ontological or meta-model analysis and/or use objective metrics. They ignore the model user's perception of semantic quality, which also determines whether the benefits of using a faithful model will be achieved. The paper presents the development of a perceived semantic quality measure. It presents a measure pre-test, i.e. a study aimed at refining and validating a new measure before its use in research and practice. The results of the pre-test show that our measure is reliable and that it is sufficiently differentiated from other perception-based measures of information model use like ease of use, usefulness, and user information satisfaction.

[1]  Ron Weber,et al.  Research Commentary: Information Systems and Conceptual Modeling - A Research Agenda , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[2]  E. Tansley,et al.  Using ontology to validate conceptual models , 2003, CACM.

[3]  Gilbert A. Churchill A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs , 1979 .

[4]  D. Campbell,et al.  Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. , 1959, Psychological bulletin.

[5]  Colette Rolland,et al.  A Process for Generating Fitness Measures , 2005, CAiSE.

[6]  D. Watson,et al.  Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development , 1995 .

[7]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[8]  Arne Sølvberg,et al.  Understanding quality in conceptual modeling , 1994, IEEE Software.

[9]  Jacky Akoka,et al.  Comparaison de deux modèles de systèmes d'information comptables , 2004 .

[10]  J. Loevinger Objective Tests as Instruments of Psychological Theory , 1957 .

[11]  Geert Poels,et al.  Faculteit Economie En Bedrijfskunde Hoveniersberg 24 B-9000 Gent Working Paper User Attitudes towards Pattern-based Enterprise Information Models: a Replicated Experiment with Rea Diagrams User Attitudes towards Pattern-based Enterprise Information Models: a Replicated Experiment with Rea Diagrams , 2022 .

[12]  WandYair,et al.  Complexity and clarity in conceptual modeling , 2005 .

[13]  Cheryl L. Dunn,et al.  Perceived semantic expressiveness of accounting systems and task accuracy effects , 2000, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..

[14]  Susanne Patig,et al.  Zur Ausdrucksstärke der Stammdaten des Advanced Planning and Scheduling , 2004, Wirtschaftsinf..

[15]  Andrew Gemino,et al.  Evaluating modeling techniques based on models of learning , 2003, CACM.

[16]  Andrew Gemino,et al.  Complexity and clarity in conceptual modeling: Comparison of mandatory and optional properties , 2005, Data Knowl. Eng..

[17]  Geert Poels,et al.  A Measure for the Perceived Semantic Expressiveness of Accounting Information Models , 2004 .

[18]  Jeffrey Parsons,et al.  What do the pictures mean? Guidelines for experimental evaluation of representation fidelity in diagrammatical conceptual modeling techniques , 2005, Data Knowl. Eng..

[19]  Aleda V. Roth,et al.  New measurement scales for evaluating perceptions of the technology‐mediated customer service experience , 2004 .