Finite Element Investigation of Stentless Pericardial Aortic Valves: Relevance of Leaflet Geometry

Recent developments in aortic valve replacement include the truly stentless pericardial bioprostheses with single point attached commissures (SPAC) implantation technique. The leaflet geometry available for the SPAC valves can either be a simple tubular or a complex three-dimensional structure molded using specially designed molds. Our main objective was to compare these two leaflet designs, the tubular vs. the molded, by dynamic finite element simulation. Time-varying physiological pressure loadings over a full cardiac cycle were simulated using ABAQUS. Dynamic leaflet behavior, leaflet coaptation parameters, and stress distribution were compared. The maximum effective valve orifice area during systole is 633.5 mm2 in the molded valve vs. 400.6 mm2 in the tubular valve, and the leaflet coaptation height during diastole is 4.5 mm in the former, in contrast to 1.6 mm in the latter. Computed compressive stress indicates high magnitudes at the commissures and inter-leaflet margins of the tubular valve, the highest being 3.83 MPa, more than twice greater than 1.80 MPa in the molded valve. The molded leaflet design which resembles the native valve exerts a positive influence on the mechanical performance of the SPAC pericardial valves compared with the simple tubular design. This may suggest enhanced valve efficacy and durability.

[1]  Jia Lu,et al.  Dynamic Simulation of Bioprosthetic Heart Valves Using a Stress Resultant Shell Model , 2008, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  M. Thubrikar.  The Aortic Valve , 1990 .

[3]  Hee-Sun Kim,et al.  Structural simulations of prosthetic tri-leaflet aortic heart valves. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  A. Sosnowski,et al.  Use of stentless xenografts in the aortic position: determinants of early and late outcome. , 2002, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[5]  Hanlon Jg,et al.  Pre-use intraoperative testing of autologous tissue for valvular surgery: a proof of concept study. , 1999 .

[6]  Michael S Sacks,et al.  The effects of collagen fiber orientation on the flexural properties of pericardial heterograft biomaterials. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[7]  A. Moritz,et al.  Aortic leaflet replacement with the new 3F stentless aortic bioprosthesis. , 2005, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[8]  G von Bally,et al.  In vitro testing of bioprostheses: influence of mechanical stresses and lipids on calcification. , 1998, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[9]  D R Boughner,et al.  The bovine pericardial xenograft: I. Effect of fixation in aldehydes without constraint on the tensile viscoelastic properties of bovine pericardium. , 1989, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[10]  M. Sacks,et al.  Biaxial mechanical properties of the natural and glutaraldehyde treated aortic valve cusp--Part I: Experimental results. , 2000, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[11]  L. V. von Segesser,et al.  A new equine pericardial stentless valve. , 2003, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[12]  F P T Baaijens,et al.  A three-dimensional computational analysis of fluid-structure interaction in the aortic valve. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  J Fisher,et al.  Anisotropic elasticity and strength of glutaraldehyde fixed bovine pericardium for use in pericardial bioprosthetic valves. , 1994, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[14]  Michael S Sacks,et al.  Design and analysis of tissue engineering scaffolds that mimic soft tissue mechanical anisotropy. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[15]  Khee Hiang Lim,et al.  Truly stentless molded autologous pericardial aortic valve prosthesis with single point attached commissures in a sheep model. , 2008, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[16]  S. P. Nolan,et al.  The dynamic aortic root. Its role in aortic valve function. , 1976, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[17]  Khee Hiang Lim,et al.  Forces at single point attached commissures (SPAC) in pericardial aortic valve prosthesis. , 2006, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[18]  X. Luo,et al.  A nonlinear anisotropic model for porcine aortic heart valves. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[19]  Catherine M. Otto,et al.  Practice of Clinical Echocardiography , 2007 .

[20]  Keith Myers,et al.  Tubular heart valves: a new tissue prosthesis design--preclinical evaluation of the 3F aortic bioprosthesis. , 2005, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[21]  Hélène A. Simon,et al.  FLUID MECHANICS OF ARTIFICIAL HEART VALVES , 2009, Clinical and experimental pharmacology & physiology.

[22]  B S Goldman,et al.  A novel comparison of stentless versus stented valves in the small aortic root. , 1999, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[23]  J. W. Love,et al.  Pre-use intraoperative testing of autologous tissue for valvular surgery: a proof of concept study. , 1999, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[24]  I. C. Howard,et al.  A comparative study of linear and nonlinear simulations of the leaflets in a bioprosthetic heart valve during the cardiac cycle. , 1996, Journal of medical engineering & technology.

[25]  P. Schreurs,et al.  A three-dimensional mechanical analysis of a stentless fibre-reinforced aortic valve prosthesis. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[26]  Flat or curved pericardial aortic valve cusps: a finite element study. , 2004, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[27]  W. Konertz,et al.  Aortic valve replacement with new-generation stentless pericardial valves: short-term clinical and hemodynamic results. , 2005, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[28]  Jia Lu,et al.  An Experimentally Derived Stress Resultant Shell Model for Heart Valve Dynamic Simulations , 2006, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[29]  Komarakshi R Balakrishnan,et al.  Dynamic analysis of the aortic valve using a finite element model. , 2002, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[30]  F J Schoen,et al.  Tissue engineering of heart valves: in vitro experiences. , 2000, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[31]  I. C. Howard,et al.  An approach to the simulation of fluid-structure interaction in the aortic valve. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[32]  M. Thubrikar,et al.  Role of mechanical stress in calcification of aortic bioprosthetic valves. , 1983, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[33]  A Corvi,et al.  Functional analysis of bioprosthetic heart valves. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[34]  Lee Jm,et al.  The bovine pericardial xenograft: I. Effect of fixation in aldehydes without constraint on the tensile viscoelastic properties of bovine pericardium , 1989 .

[35]  M. O'brien,et al.  The Cryolife-O'Brien composite aortic stentless xenograft: surgical technique of implantation. , 1995, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[36]  Komarakshi R Balakrishnan,et al.  Further insights into normal aortic valve function: role of a compliant aortic root on leaflet opening and valve orifice area. , 2004, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[37]  A. Yoganathan,et al.  Fluid Dynamics of Prosthetic Valves , 2007 .