Effects of grafting poly(ethylene oxide) on the amplification efficiency of a poly(dimethylsiloxane)-based flow-through PCR device

The effects of grafting poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) onto the surface of a microchannel on the amplification efficiency of a microfabricated device for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) were studied. The PCR device was composed of a poly(dimethylsiloxane) microchannel and a glass-heating chip. The PEO chains were grafted using neat silane or Pluronic® F127, and the presence of PEO was confirmed by water contact angle analysis and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. The surface treatments with neat silane and 10% (w/v) Pluronic® F127 resulted in an increase in the PCR amplification of a 298-bp DNA product by 2.2-fold and 3.9-fold, respectively, while 1.7-fold and 2.3-fold increases, respectively, were observed for a 1.1-kb DNA product. Both treatments could effectively enhance PCR efficiency even when DNA template concentration was decreased from 20 to 2 pg/μl. Our results indicated that these simple surface treatments could therefore be used routinely to enhance the performance of similar devices.

[1]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Microfluidic devices fabricated in Poly(dimethylsiloxane) for biological studies , 2003, Electrophoresis.

[2]  I-Ching Kuan,et al.  Fabrication and characterization of a flow-through PCR device with integrated chromium resistive heaters , 2007 .

[3]  Hiroaki Misawa,et al.  A heater-integrated transparent microchannel chip for continuous-flow PCR , 2002 .

[4]  Da Xing,et al.  Miniaturized PCR chips for nucleic acid amplification and analysis: latest advances and future trends , 2007, Nucleic acids research.

[5]  M. Chaudhury,et al.  Hydrophobicity loss and recovery of silicone HV insulation , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation.

[6]  Chunsun Zhang,et al.  PCR microfluidic devices for DNA amplification. , 2006, Biotechnology advances.

[7]  M. Brook,et al.  Protein repellant silicone surfaces by covalent immobilization of poly(ethylene oxide). , 2005, Biomaterials.

[8]  Tai Hyun Park,et al.  Fabrication and characterization of a PDMS–glass hybrid continuous-flow PCR chip , 2006 .

[9]  C. Vieu,et al.  Journal of Nanobiotechnology BioMed Central Research Interaction of silver nanoparticles with HIV-1 , 2005 .

[10]  J P Landers,et al.  Towards dynamic coating of glass microchip chambers for amplifying DNA via the polymerase chain reaction , 2001, Electrophoresis.

[11]  Teruo Fujii,et al.  Microfabricated flow-through device for DNA amplification—towards in situ gene analysis , 2004 .

[12]  Jinyi Wang,et al.  Solution-phase surface modification in intact poly(dimethylsiloxane) microfluidic channels. , 2006, Analytical chemistry.

[13]  A Manz,et al.  Chemical amplification: continuous-flow PCR on a chip. , 1998, Science.

[14]  Jin Ho Kim,et al.  Surface modification of poly(dimethylsiloxane) microchannels , 2003, Electrophoresis.

[15]  E. Gulari,et al.  Minimizing the surface effect of PDMS–glass microchip on polymerase chain reaction by dynamic polymer passivation , 2007 .

[16]  R. Stutz,et al.  Microcontact Printing Using Poly(dimethylsiloxane) Stamps Hydrophilized by Poly(ethylene oxide) Silanes , 2003 .

[17]  Dong-Chul Han,et al.  PDMS-based micro PCR chip with Parylene coating , 2003 .

[18]  Zheng Cui,et al.  Simple surface treatments to modify protein adsorption and cell attachment properties within a poly(dimethylsiloxane) micro‐bioreactor , 2006 .

[19]  C. Vieu,et al.  Poly(dimethylsiloxane) contamination in microcontact printing and its influence on patterning oligonucleotides. , 2007, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[20]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Rapid Prototyping of Microfluidic Systems in Poly(dimethylsiloxane). , 1998, Analytical chemistry.