Exploring teacher acceptance of e‐learning technology

A number of studies have indicated that the successful pedagogical use of technology depends on teachers' attitudes and acceptance towards technology. In order to predict and understand teachers' technology use and acceptance, a well‐defined framework is essential. The purpose of the present paper attempts to explore a model to understand teacher acceptance of e‐learning technology. A self‐reported questionnaire was designed to examine teacher acceptance and attitude towards an online learning platform. Data were collected from 152 in‐service teachers who were studying in a part‐time teacher education program in Hong Kong. The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) was used as the core framework for analysis while additional constructs were added in order to find a better model to understand teacher acceptance of e‐learning technology. A composite model including five constructs, namely, intention to use, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, subjective norm and computer self‐efficacy, were formed and tested in the study. LISREL was used in the data analysis. It was found that subjective norm and computer self‐efficacy serve as the two significant perception anchors of the fundamental constructs in TAM. However, contrary to previous literature, perceived ease of use became the sole determinant to the prediction of intention to use, while perceived usefulness was non‐significant to the prediction of intention to use. Altogether, subjective norm, computer self‐efficacy and perceived ease of use were able to explain 68% of the variance observed in users' intention to use the e‐learning system. Implications to teacher education and teacher professional development are discussed.

[1]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[2]  J. Lawton,et al.  A Review of the Literature on Attitudes Towards Computers and Computerized Instruction. , 1982 .

[3]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  Disentangling behavioral intention and behavioral expectation , 1985 .

[4]  Brenda H. Loyd,et al.  Age and Staff Development Experience with Computers as Factors Affecting Teacher Attitudes toward Computers. , 1985 .

[5]  A. Bandura.  Social Foundations of Thought and Action , 1986 .

[6]  Alex Koohang,et al.  A study of attitudes toward computers: anxiety, confidence, liking, and perception of usefulness , 1987 .

[7]  Blair H. Sheppard,et al.  The Theory of Reasoned Action: A Meta-Analysis of Past Research with Recommendations for Modifications and Future Research , 1988 .

[8]  Karl G. Jöreskog,et al.  Lisrel 8: User's Reference Guide , 1997 .

[9]  Claudio Violato,et al.  A Confirmatory Factor Analysis of a Four-Factor Model of Attitudes toward Computers: A Study of Preservice Teachers , 1989 .

[10]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[11]  Mike Summers,et al.  New Student Teachers and Computers: an investigation of experiences and feelings , 1990 .

[12]  Kieran Mathieson,et al.  Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[13]  Tony C. M. Lam,et al.  The Computer Attitude Scale: Assessing Changes in Teachers' Attitudes toward Computers , 1994 .

[14]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[15]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test , 1995, MIS Q..

[16]  Bernadette Szajna,et al.  Empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model , 1996 .

[17]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Model of the Antecedents of Perceived Ease of Use: Development and Test† , 1996 .

[18]  Using Technology to Prepare Teachers for the Twenty‐first Century , 1997 .

[19]  E. Kelloway.  Using LISREL for Structural Equation Modeling: A Researcher′s Guide , 1998 .

[20]  N. Law,et al.  Improving IT training for serving teachers through evaluation , 1999 .

[21]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Social Cognitive Theory and Individual Reactions to Computing Technology: A Longitudinal Study , 1999, MIS Q..

[22]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Creation of Favorable User Perceptions: Exploring the Role of Intrinsic Motivation , 1999, MIS Q..

[23]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[24]  Richard Smith,et al.  The Future of Teacher Education: Principles and prospects (1) , 2000 .

[25]  Roger Lindsay,et al.  The Role of Information and Communication Technologies in a University Learning Environment , 2001 .

[26]  Wendy Sutherland-Smith.  Weaving the literacy web : changes in reading from page to screen , 2002 .

[27]  Andrew Whitworth,et al.  Information fluency: critically examining IT education , 2002 .

[28]  A. Yuen,et al.  Gender Differences in Teacher Computer Acceptance. , 2002 .

[29]  Yi-Shun Wang,et al.  Assessment of learner satisfaction with asynchronous electronic learning systems , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[30]  John Ingham,et al.  Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[31]  Diane J. Hanson,et al.  E-Learning: Strategies for Delivering Knowledge in the Digital Age , 2003, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[32]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[33]  Neil Selwyn,et al.  Accounting undergraduates' changing use of ICT and their views on using the Internet in higher education – a research note , 2004 .

[34]  Ian Hall,et al.  Primary school students' perceptions of interactive whiteboards , 2005, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[35]  Robert Andersson,et al.  Examining user acceptance of computer technology: an empirical study of student teachers , 2005, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[36]  Katerine Bielaczyc,et al.  Designing Social Infrastructure: Critical Issues in Creating Learning Environments With Technology , 2006 .

[37]  Melor Md Yunus,et al.  Malaysian ESL teachers’ use of ICT in their classrooms: expectations and realities , 2007, ReCALL.

[38]  Young B. Choi,et al.  Toward a future wireless classroom paradigm , 2007 .

[39]  Vahid Motamedi,et al.  Predicting Preservice Teacher Competence in Computer Technology: Modeling and Application in Training Environments , 2007 .

[40]  Krassie Petrova,et al.  Mobile learning as a mobile business application , 2007 .

[41]  Neil Selwyn,et al.  The use of computer technology in university teaching and learning: a critical perspective , 2007, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[42]  Millennial teachers: Student teachers as users of Information and Communication - A New Zealand case study , 2007 .

[43]  Millennial teachers: Student teachers as users of information and communication technologies , 2007 .

[44]  Timothy Teo,et al.  Understanding pre-service teachers' computer attitudes: applying and extending the technology acceptance model , 2007, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..