Bayesian analysis of multi-state data with individual covariates for estimating genetic effects on demography

Inbreeding depression is frequently a concern of managers interested in restoring endangered species. Decisions to reduce the potential for inbreeding depression by balancing genotypic contributions to reintroduced populations may exact a cost on long-term demographic performance of the population if those decisions result in reduced numbers of animals released and/or restriction of particularly successful genotypes (i.e., heritable traits of particular family lines). As part of an effort to restore a migratory flock of Whooping Cranes (Grus americana) to eastern North America using the offspring of captive breeders, we obtained a unique dataset which includes post-release mark–recapture data, as well as the pedigree of each released individual. We developed a Bayesian formulation of a multi-state model to analyze radio-telemetry, band-resight, and dead recovery data on reintroduced individuals, in order to track survival and breeding state transitions. We used studbook-based individual covariates to examine the comparative evidence for and degree of effects of inbreeding, genotype, and genotype quality on post-release survival of reintroduced individuals. We demonstrate implementation of the Bayesian multi-state model, which allows for the integration of imperfect detection, multiple data types, random effects, and individual- and time-dependent covariates. Our results provide only weak evidence for an effect of the quality of an individual’s genotype in captivity on post-release survival as well as for an effect of inbreeding on post-release survival. We plan to integrate our results into a decision-analytic modeling framework that can explicitly examine tradeoffs between the effects of inbreeding and the effects of genotype and demographic stochasticity on population establishment.

[1]  R. Lande.  Genetics and demography in biological conservation. , 1988, Science.

[2]  Richard P. Urbanek,et al.  Winter release and management of reintroduced migratory Whooping Cranes Grus americana , 2009, Bird Conservation International.

[3]  William J. Browne,et al.  Use of posterior predictive assessments to evaluate model fit in multilevel logistic regression , 2009, Veterinary research.

[4]  P. Dolman,et al.  Distribution, status and conservation of the Bengal Florican Houbaropsis bengalensis in Cambodia , 2009, Bird Conservation International.

[5]  R. Frankham.  Genetic adaptation to captivity in species conservation programs , 2008, Molecular ecology.

[6]  David B. Lindenmayer,et al.  An assessment of the published results of animal relocations , 2000 .

[7]  Robert T. Clemen,et al.  Making Hard Decisions: An Introduction to Decision Analysis , 1997 .

[8]  J Andrew Royle,et al.  Demographic Analysis from Summaries of an Age‐Structured Population , 2003, Biometrics.

[9]  R. Millar,et al.  Comparison of Hierarchical Bayesian Models for Overdispersed Count Data using DIC and Bayes' Factors , 2009, Biometrics.

[10]  B. Griffith,et al.  Avian and Mammalian Translocations: Update and Reanalysis of 1987 Survey Data , 1996 .

[11]  M. Blouin,et al.  Use of microsatellite loci to classify individuals by relatedness , 1996, Molecular ecology.

[12]  T. Glenn,et al.  Refining the Whooping Crane Studbook by Incorporating Microsatellite DNA and Leg‐Banding Analyses , 2002 .

[13]  Walter R. Gilks,et al.  A Language and Program for Complex Bayesian Modelling , 1994 .

[14]  D. Queller,et al.  ESTIMATING RELATEDNESS USING GENETIC MARKERS , 1989, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[15]  Martin J. Folk,et al.  Evaluating release alternatives for a long-lived bird species under uncertainty about long-term demographic rates , 2010, Journal of Ornithology.

[16]  Roger Pradel,et al.  Competing events, mixtures of information and multistratum recapture models , 1999 .

[17]  R. Frankham.  Conservation genetics. , 1995, Annual review of genetics.

[18]  Jonathan D. Ballou,et al.  Introduction to Conservation Genetics: Frontmatter , 2010 .

[19]  Derek A Roff,et al.  Inbreeding depression in the wild , 1999, Heredity.

[20]  R. Urbanek,et al.  FIRST COHORT OF MIGRATORY WHOOPING CRANES REINTRODUCED TO EASTERNNORTH AMERICA: THE FIRST YEAR AFTER RELEASE , 2005 .

[21]  William A Link,et al.  Model weights and the foundations of multimodel inference. , 2006, Ecology.

[22]  L. Joseph.  4. Bayesian data analysis (2nd edn). Andrew Gelman, John B. Carlin, Hal S. Stern and Donald B. Rubin (eds), Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, 2003. No. of pages: xxv + 668. Price: $59.95. ISBN 1‐58488‐388‐X , 2004 .

[23]  W. Stephan,et al.  Effects of a Population Bottleneck on Whooping Crane Mitochondrial DNA Variation , 1999 .

[24]  Andrew Gelman,et al.  R2WinBUGS: A Package for Running WinBUGS from R , 2005 .

[25]  Paul B Conn,et al.  Combining multistate capture-recapture data with tag recoveries to estimate demographic parameters. , 2006, Ecology.

[26]  David B. Dunson,et al.  Bayesian Data Analysis , 2010 .

[27]  GARY C. WHITE,et al.  MOVEMENT OF PARADISE SHELDUCK BETWEEN MOLT SITES: A JOINT MULTISTATE-DEAD RECOVERY MARK–RECAPTURE MODEL , 2005 .