Creativity in Drawings of Geometric Shapes

This study examines whether European Americans and Chinese differ in their creation and evaluation of drawings of geometric shapes. Two hundred ninety-four drawings created by 50 European American and 48 Chinese college students were selected from a larger study of culture and creativity. Drawings were judged by eight Chinese and six European Americans following the Consensual Assessment Technique. The drawings were coded by content to examine what the judges considered creative. Results showed high consensus between European American and Chinese judges and great similarity in the creativity of drawings generated by the two groups. Judges liked best those drawings they judged more creative. The most creative drawings typically involved representations of geometric shapes in contexts (either concrete or abstract). Results run counter to the belief that there are wide cultural variations in the evaluation of and attitudes toward creativity, demonstrate the feasibility of cross-cultural comparisons with the Consensual Assessment Technique, and provide a basis for further cross-cultural research on creativity.

[1]  D. Simonton.  Creativity. Cognitive, personal, developmental, and social aspects. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[2]  A. Manstead,et al.  The influence of personal and collective self-esteem on strategies of social differentiation. , 1994, The British journal of social psychology.

[3]  Joseph Kasof,et al.  Explaining Creativity: The Attributional Perspective , 1995 .

[4]  G. Erdos,et al.  Creativity in an Indigenous Afro-Arab Islamic Culture: The Case of Sudan. , 1996 .

[5]  D. E. Berlyne,et al.  Similarity and Preference Judgments of Indian and Canadian Subjects Exposed to Western Paintings , 1976 .

[6]  H. Gerard,et al.  Distinctiveness of social categorization and attitude toward ingroup members. , 1974 .

[7]  M. Cox,et al.  Children's Drawings of the Human Figure , 1993 .

[8]  F. Barron,et al.  Complexity-simplicity as a personality dimension. , 1953, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[9]  L. Frank.  The Society for Research in Child Development , 1935 .

[10]  W. Griswold.  The Fabrication of Meaning: Literary Interpretation in the United States, Great Britain, and the West Indies , 1987, American Journal of Sociology.

[11]  Anthony G. Greenwald,et al.  An ethnic bias in scientific citations. , 1994 .

[12]  R. Goodwin,et al.  Preferences for Friends and Close Relationships Partners: A Cross-Cultural Comparison. , 1991 .

[13]  S. Schwartz.  Beyond individualism/collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values. , 1994 .

[14]  Michael Sullivan.  The meeting of Eastern and Western art , 1973 .

[15]  Harry C. Triandis,et al.  Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications. , 1996 .

[16]  E. Rudowicz,et al.  Use of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking in an Exploratory Study of Creativity in Hong Kong Primary School Children: A Cross‐cultural Comparison , 1995 .

[17]  R. Richards,et al.  Assessing everyday creativity: Characteristics of the Lifetime Creativity Scales and validation with three large samples. , 1988 .

[18]  P. Greenfield.  You can't take it with you: Why ability assessments don't cross cultures. , 1997 .

[19]  D. Simonton.  Galtonian genius, Kroeberian configurations, and emulation: A generational time-series analysis of Chinese civilization. , 1988 .

[20]  Greg W. Schmidt,et al.  Self-Esteem and Direct Versus Indirect Forms of Self-Enhancement , 1988 .

[21]  Ellen Winner,et al.  How Can Chinese Children Draw so Well , 1989 .

[22]  Stephen Worchel,et al.  Evaluations of group products as a function of expectations of group longevity, outcome of competition, and publicity of evaluations. , 1975 .

[23]  D M Harrington,et al.  Effects of explicit instructions to "be creative" on the psychological meaning of divergent thinking test scores. , 1975, Journal of personality.

[24]  George Schlager Welsh,et al.  Creativity and intelligence: A personality approach , 1975 .

[25]  The Draw‐A‐Person Test: Social conformity or artistic ability? , 1970 .

[26]  T. Lubart.  Handbook of Creativity: Creativity Across Cultures , 1998 .

[27]  R. R. Blake,et al.  Overevaluation of own group's product in intergroup competition. , 1962, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[28]  S. Iwao,et al.  Further evidence of agreement between Japanese and American esthetic evaluations. , 1969, The Journal of social psychology.

[29]  T. M. Amabile.  The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. , 1983 .

[30]  A. Ludwig,et al.  Culture and creativity. , 1992, American journal of psychotherapy.

[31]  J. W. Getzels,et al.  Discovery-oriented behavior and the originality of creative products: a study with artists. , 1971, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[32]  R. Holt,et al.  Creativity and primary process: a study of adaptive regression. , 1960, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[33]  M. Cox,et al.  Children's drawing ability in the UK and China , 1998 .

[34]  Carrie B. Fried,et al.  Bad Rap for Rap: Bias in Reactions to Music Lyrics , 1996 .

[35]  R. Sternberg.  Handbook of Creativity: Subject Index , 1998 .

[36]  M. Field.  Defying the Crowd: Cultivating Creativity in a Culture of Conformity , 1996 .

[37]  Sharon Bailin.  CREATIVITY IN CONTEXT , 2002 .

[38]  A. Rothenberg,et al.  Artistic creation as stimulated by superimposed versus separated visual images. , 1980, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[39]  G. Erdos,et al.  Traditional Education and Creativity in an Afro-Arab. Islamic Culture: The Case of Sudan , 1997 .

[40]  H. H. Spitz,et al.  Cross-Cultural Differences. , 1963, Science.

[41]  H. Davis,et al.  Evaluative bias in group and individual competition. , 1970, Journal of Social Psychology.

[42]  Francis L. K. Hsu,et al.  Americans and Chinese : passage to differences , 1981 .

[43]  D. Hocevar,et al.  A Taxonomy and Critique of Measurements Used in the Study of Creativity , 1989 .

[44]  H. Kelley,et al.  SIGNIFICANT FACTORS IN OVEREVALUATION OF OWN-GROUP'S PRODUCT. , 1964, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[45]  E. Paul Torrance,et al.  Culture and Tendencies to Draw Objects in Internal Visual Perspective , 1978 .

[46]  Harry R. Silver.  Selective Affinities: Connoisseurship, Culture, and Aesthetic Choice in a Contemporary African Community , 1983 .

[47]  John W. Berry,et al.  Imposed etics-emics-derived etics: The operationalization of a compelling idea. , 1989 .

[48]  Dean Keith Simonton,et al.  Foreign influence and national achievement: The impact of open milieus on Japanese civilization. , 1997 .

[49]  J. Berry,et al.  Cross-cultural psychology as a scholarly discipline: On the flowering of culture in behavioral research. , 1998 .

[50]  H. Triandis,et al.  Multimethod probes of individualism and collectivism. , 1990 .

[51]  Howard Gardner,et al.  To Open Minds: Chinese Clues to the Dilemma of Contemporary Education , 1989 .

[52]  D. R. Lehman,et al.  The cultural construction of self-enhancement: an examination of group-serving biases. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[53]  R. Ripple,et al.  A Life-Span Developmental Cross-Cultural Study of Divergent Thinking Abilities , 1985, International journal of aging & human development.

[54]  M. Bond.  Beyond the Chinese face : insights from psychology , 1991 .