Trade effects of ASEAN-plus-China and -Japan free trade agreements by production stage and industry

This article examines the trade creation and diversion effects of ASEAN-Plus-China (ACFTA) and -Japan (AJFTA) free trade agreements with focuses on production stage and machinery industry by estimating the gravity trade model for the recent two decades between 1993 and 2015. The purpose for focusing on the trade flows by production stages (final goods and intermediate goods) and by industries (machinery and non-machinery) is to uncover the effects of ACFTA and AJFTA on the expanding international production networks in East Asia. The main findings are summarized as follows. First, regarding industry total, the trade creation effects of ACFTA and AJFTA are identified not in intermediate goods but in final goods. It might come from the larger tariff gaps between the Most Favored Nation (MFN) rates and the preferential rate for ASEAN in final goods than in intermediate goods, reflecting the structure of “tariff escalation”. Comparing the effects of ACFTA and AJFTA, the larger trade creation effects are found in ACFTA than in AJFTA, probably due to the larger tariff gaps with the higher MFN rates in China. As for machinery industry, the trade creation effects are verified on ACFTA probably due to the large tariff gaps with the still-existing high MFN in China, while no trade creation effects are found because of no tariff gaps with almost zero MFN rates in Japan.

[1]  Hiroyuki Taguchi Trade creation and diversion effects of ASEAN-plus-one free trade agreements , 2015 .

[2]  I. Martínez‐Zarzoso,et al.  A Panel Data Analysis of Trade Creation and Trade Diversion effects: The case of ASEAN-China Free Trade Area , 2014 .

[3]  S. Urata,et al.  Trade Creation and Diversion Effects of Regional Trade Agreements: A Product‐Level Analysis , 2014 .

[4]  Yu Sheng,et al.  The Impact of ACFTA on People’s Republic of China–ASEAN Trade: Estimates Based on an Extended Gravity Model for Component Trade , 2012 .

[5]  H. Vandenbussche,et al.  The chilling trade effects of antidumping proliferation , 2010 .

[6]  H. Beladi,et al.  Is Regionalism Viable? A Case for Global Free Trade , 2008 .

[7]  F. Kimura,et al.  Fragmentation and parts and components trade: Comparison between East Asia and Europe , 2007 .

[8]  F. Kimura International Production and Distribution Networks in East Asia: Eighteen Facts, Mechanics, and Policy Implications* , 2006 .

[9]  J. Bergstrand,et al.  Do Free Trade Agreements Actually Increase Members' International Trade? , 2005 .

[10]  Steven Yamarik,et al.  Are regional trading arrangements trade creating?: An application of extreme bounds analysis , 2004 .

[11]  James E. Anderson,et al.  Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle , 2001 .

[12]  Sang-Seung Yi Free-Trade Areas and Welfare: An Equilibrium Analysis , 1998 .

[13]  H. M. A. Onitiri,et al.  Shaping the World Economy by Jan Tinbergen The Twentieth Century Fund, New York, 1962. Pp. xviii + 330. $4. , 1963, The Journal of Modern African Studies.

[14]  H. Catudal The Customs Union Issue. , 1951, American Journal of International Law.

[15]  Peniti Pöyhönen,et al.  A Tentative Model for the Volume of Trade between Countries , 2016 .

[16]  M. Okabe Impact of Free Trade Agreements on Trade in East Asia , 2015 .

[17]  J. Brander,et al.  Market structure and foreign trade , 1985 .

[18]  James E. Anderson A Theoretical Foundation for the Gravity Equation , 1979 .