An Exploration of Cursor tracking Data

Cursor tracking data contains information about website visitors which may provide new ways to understand visitors and their needs. This paper presents an Amazon Mechanical Turk study where participants were tracked as they used modified variants of the Wikipedia and BBC News websites. Participants were asked to complete reading and information-finding tasks. The results showed that it was possible to differentiate between users reading content and users looking for information based on cursor data. The effects of website aesthetics, user interest and cursor hardware were also analysed which showed it was possible to identify hardware from cursor data, but no relationship between cursor data and engagement was found. The implications of these results, from the impact on web analytics to the design of experiments to assess user engagement, are discussed.

[1]  Ryen W. White,et al.  User see, user point: gaze and cursor alignment in web search , 2012, CHI.

[2]  George Valkanas,et al.  Understanding Within-Content Engagement through Pattern Analysis of Mouse Gestures , 2014, CIKM.

[3]  Shari Trewin,et al.  Keyboard and mouse errors due to motor disabilities , 1999, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[4]  Shumin Zhai,et al.  Performance evaluation of input devices in trajectory-based tasks: an application of the steering law , 1999, CHI '99.

[5]  Ernesto Arroyo,et al.  ( smt ) Real Time Mouse Tracking Registration and Visualization Tool for Usability Evaluation on Websites , 2007 .

[6]  Mark Claypool,et al.  Implicit interest indicators , 2001, IUI '01.

[7]  Edward Cutrell,et al.  Quantitative analysis of scrolling techniques , 2002, CHI.

[8]  C. Y. Peng,et al.  An Introduction to Logistic Regression Analysis and Reporting , 2002 .

[9]  Mounia Lalmas,et al.  Measuring User Engagement , 2014, Measuring User Engagement.

[10]  Ryen W. White,et al.  No clicks, no problem: using cursor movements to understand and improve search , 2011, CHI.

[11]  Tom Rodden,et al.  At home with the technology: an ethnographic study of a set-top-box trial , 1999, TCHI.

[12]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Synthesis Lectures on Information Concepts, Retrieval, and Services , 2009 .

[13]  Elaine Toms,et al.  What is user engagement? A conceptual framework for defining user engagement with technology , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[14]  Johanna D. Moore,et al.  Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces , 2001 .

[15]  Gabriella Kazai,et al.  Towards a science of user engagement (Position Paper) , 2011 .

[16]  A.K. Jain,et al.  Webbiometrics: User Verification Via Web Interaction , 2007, 2007 Biometrics Symposium.

[17]  Dan Morris,et al.  Instrumenting the Dynamic Web , 2007, J. Web Eng..

[18]  Luis A. Leiva Torres.  (SMT) REAL TIME MOUSE TRACKING REGISTRATION AND VISUALIZATION TOOL FOR USABILITY EVALUATION ON WEBSITES , 2007 .

[19]  Bart Visser,et al.  Effects of precision demands and mental pressure on muscle activation and hand forces in computer mouse tasks , 2004, Ergonomics.

[20]  Wolfgang Maehr.  eMotion: Estimation of User's Emotional State by Mouse Motions , 2008 .

[21]  John R. Anderson,et al.  What can a mouse cursor tell us more?: correlation of eye/mouse movements on web browsing , 2001, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[22]  Kerry Rodden,et al.  Eye-mouse coordination patterns on web search results pages , 2008, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[23]  D. Watson,et al.  Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[24]  C. Riviere,et al.  Effects of age and disability on tracking tasks with a computer mouse: accuracy and linearity. , 1996, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[25]  Michael Bernard,et al.  A Comparison of Popular Online Fonts: Which Size and Type is Best? , 2002 .

[26]  Elaine Toms,et al.  The development and evaluation of a survey to measure user engagement , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[27]  Ernesto Arroyo,et al.  Usability tool for analysis of web designs using mouse tracks , 2006, CHI Extended Abstracts.