Automated Feature Set Selection and Its Application to MCC Identification in Digital Mammograms for Breast Cancer Detection

We propose a fully automated algorithm that is able to select a discriminative feature set from a training database via sequential forward selection (SFS), sequential backward selection (SBS), and F-score methods. We applied this scheme to microcalcifications cluster (MCC) detection in digital mammograms for early breast cancer detection. The system was able to select features fully automatically, regardless of the input training mammograms used. We tested the proposed scheme using a database of 111 clinical mammograms containing 1,050 microcalcifications (MCs). The accuracy of the system was examined via a free response receiver operating characteristic (fROC) curve of the test dataset. The system performance for MC identifications was Az = 0.9897, the sensitivity was 92%, and 0.65 false positives (FPs) were generated per image for MCC detection.

[1]  Robert M. Nishikawa,et al.  A study on several Machine-learning methods for classification of Malignant and benign clustered microcalcifications , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[2]  Berkman Sahiner,et al.  Computer aided detection of clusters of microcalcifications on full field digital mammograms. , 2006, Medical physics.

[3]  Maria Rizzi,et al.  A Fully Automatic System for Detection of Breast Microcalcification Clusters , 2010 .

[4]  M. Mainiero,et al.  BI-RADS lexicon for US and mammography: interobserver variability and positive predictive value. , 2006, Radiology.

[5]  David K. Espey,et al.  Strengthening breast and cervical cancer control through partnerships: American Indian and Alaska Native Women and the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program , 2014, Cancer.

[6]  T. Martin,et al.  American Cancer Society (ACS) , 2014, The Grants Register 2022.

[7]  D. Kopans The positive predictive value of mammography. , 1992, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  I. D. Longstaff,et al.  Improving Co-occurrence Matrix Feature Discrimination , 1995 .

[9]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[10]  N. Otsu A threshold selection method from gray level histograms , 1979 .

[11]  Maryellen L. Giger,et al.  Correlative Analysis of FFDM and DCE-MRI for Improved Breast CADx , 2012 .

[12]  B. Ripley,et al.  Pattern Recognition , 1968, Nature.

[13]  Robert M. Nishikawa,et al.  Microcalcification Classification Assisted by Content-Based Image Retrieval for Breast Cancer Diagnosis , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[14]  Sung-Nien Yu,et al.  Detection of microcalcifications in digital mammograms using wavelet filter and Markov random field model , 2006, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[15]  Artur Przelaskowski,et al.  Segmentation and feature extraction for reliable classification of microcalcifications in digital mammograms , 2003 .

[16]  M. Gülsün,et al.  Evaluation of breast microcalcifications according to Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System criteria and Le Gal's classification. , 2003, European journal of radiology.

[17]  Xiaoyi Jiang,et al.  AUTOMATIC DETECTION OF COLORECTAL POLYPS IN STATIC IMAGES , 2011 .

[18]  H. S. Wolff,et al.  iRun: Horizontal and Vertical Shape of a Region-Based Graph Compression , 2022, Sensors.

[19]  Heng-Da Cheng,et al.  Microcalcification detection using fuzzy logic and scale space approaches , 2004, Pattern Recognit..

[20]  M Kallergi,et al.  Evaluating the performance of detection algorithms in digital mammography. , 1999, Medical physics.

[21]  N Roberts,et al.  Segmentation and numerical analysis of microcalcifications on mammograms using mathematical morphology. , 1997, The British journal of radiology.

[22]  J. C. Fu,et al.  Image segmentation feature selection and pattern classification for mammographic microcalcifications. , 2005, Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society.

[23]  L. Costaridou,et al.  Texture analysis of tissue surrounding microcalcifications on mammograms for breast cancer diagnosis. , 2007, The British journal of radiology.

[24]  Ron Kohavi,et al.  A Study of Cross-Validation and Bootstrap for Accuracy Estimation and Model Selection , 1995, IJCAI.

[25]  KathleenR. Brandt,et al.  Screening mammograms: interpretation with computer-aided detection--prospective evaluation. , 2006, Radiology.

[26]  Ming-Chi Lee,et al.  Using support vector machine with a hybrid feature selection method to the stock trend prediction , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[27]  Nikolas P. Galatsanos,et al.  A support vector machine approach for detection of microcalcifications , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[28]  A. Milbourne,et al.  Access, access, access , 2007, Cancer.

[29]  R. L. Birdwell Screening Mammography–detected Cancers: Sensitivity of a Computer-aided Detection System Applied to Full-Field Digital Mammograms , 2008 .

[30]  Masoud Nikravesh,et al.  Feature Extraction - Foundations and Applications , 2006, Feature Extraction.

[31]  E. Sickles Breast calcifications: mammographic evaluation. , 1986, Radiology.

[32]  E. Grabbe,et al.  Computer-aided detection in direct digital full-field mammography: initial results , 2002, European Radiology.

[33]  Woo Kyung Moon,et al.  Screening mammography-detected cancers: sensitivity of a computer-aided detection system applied to full-field digital mammograms. , 2007, Radiology.

[34]  F P Roth,et al.  Bringing out the best features of expression data. , 2001, Genome research.

[35]  J. J. Gisvold,et al.  Likelihood of malignant disease for various categories of mammographically detected, nonpalpable breast lesions. , 1993, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[36]  Josef Kittler,et al.  Pattern recognition : a statistical approach , 1982 .

[37]  M. Xiong,et al.  Biomarker Identification by Feature Wrappers , 2022 .

[38]  Tony F. Chan,et al.  Image processing and analysis - variational, PDE, wavelet, and stochastic methods , 2005 .

[39]  Xu Yang,et al.  F-score feature selection method may improve texture-based liver segmentation strategies , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Symposium on IT in Medicine and Education.