Otterly delicious: Spatiotemporal variation in the diet of a recovering population of Eurasian otters (Lutra lutra) revealed through DNA metabarcoding and morphological analysis of prey remains

Abstract Eurasian otters are apex predators of freshwater ecosystems and a recovering species across much of their European range; investigating the dietary variation of this predator over time and space, therefore, provides opportunities to identify changes in freshwater trophic interactions and factors influencing the conservation of otter populations. Here we sampled feces from 300 dead otters across England and Wales between 2007 and 2016, conducting both morphological analyses of prey remains and dietary DNA metabarcoding. Comparison of these methods showed that greater taxonomic resolution and breadth could be achieved using DNA metabarcoding but combining data from both methodologies gave the most comprehensive dietary description. All otter demographics exploited a broad range of taxa and variation likely reflected changes in prey distributions and availability across the landscape. This study provides novel insights into the trophic generalism and adaptability of otters across Britain, which is likely to have aided their recent population recovery, and may increase their resilience to future environmental changes.

[1]  Robert P. Davey,et al.  Managing sample metadata for biodiversity: considerations from the Darwin Tree of Life project , 2022, Wellcome Open Research.

[2]  David R. Hemprich-Bennett,et al.  The predator problem and PCR primers in molecular dietary analysis: Swamped or silenced; depth or breadth? , 2022, Molecular ecology resources.

[3]  W. Symondson,et al.  An assessment of minimum sequence copy thresholds for identifying and reducing the prevalence of artefacts in dietary metabarcoding data , 2021, Methods in Ecology and Evolution.

[4]  James J. N. Kitson,et al.  Overcoming the pitfalls of merging dietary metabarcoding into ecological networks , 2021, Methods in Ecology and Evolution.

[5]  J. Piñol,et al.  Development of a multi-primer metabarcoding approach to understand trophic interactions in agroecosystems , 2021, bioRxiv.

[6]  Elizabeth Chadwick,et al.  Post-bioinformatic methods to identify and reduce the prevalence of artefacts in metabarcoding data , 2021 .

[7]  W. Symondson,et al.  The problem of omnivory: A synthesis on omnivory and DNA metabarcoding , 2021, Molecular ecology.

[8]  J. Nielsen,et al.  Comparing DNA metabarcoding with faecal analysis for diet determination of the Eurasian otter (Lutra lutra) in Vejlerne, Denmark , 2021 .

[9]  D. Fulgione,et al.  The diet of otters (Lutra lutra) on the Agri river system, one of the most important presence sites in Italy: a molecular approach , 2020, PeerJ.

[10]  E. Chadwick,et al.  Dietary complexity and hidden costs of prey switching in a generalist top predator , 2020, Ecology and evolution.

[11]  A. Pallavicini,et al.  Otter diet and prey selection in a recently recolonized area assessed using microscope analysis and DNA barcoding , 2020 .

[12]  A. Martínez‐Abraín,et al.  Determinants of Eurasian otter (Lutra lutra) diet in a seasonally changing reservoir , 2020, Hydrobiologia.

[13]  A. Grant,et al.  Diet composition of starry smooth-hound Mustelus asterias and methodological considerations for assessing the trophic level of predatory fish. , 2019, Journal of fish biology.

[14]  N. Yamamoto,et al.  DNA metabarcoding-based diet survey for the Eurasian otter (Lutra lutra): Development of a Eurasian otter-specific blocking oligonucleotide for 12S rRNA gene sequencing for vertebrates , 2019, PloS one.

[15]  S. Wasser,et al.  Prey partitioning between sympatric canid species revealed by DNA metabarcoding , 2019 .

[16]  Vanessa A. Mata,et al.  Advancing the integration of multi‐marker metabarcoding data in dietary analysis of trophic generalists , 2019, Molecular ecology resources.

[17]  Gea-Jae Joo,et al.  A molecular approach to identifying the relationship between resource use and availability in Eurasian otters (Lutra lutra) , 2019, Canadian Journal of Zoology.

[18]  Noah Fierer,et al.  DNA metabarcoding—Need for robust experimental designs to draw sound ecological conclusions , 2019, Molecular ecology.

[19]  Ruairidh D. Campbell,et al.  Recent history, current status, conservation and management of native mammalian carnivore species in Great Britain , 2019, Mammal Review.

[20]  A. Richardson,et al.  DNA metabarcoding assays reveal a diverse prey assemblage for Mobula rays in the Bohol Sea, Philippines , 2019, Ecology and evolution.

[21]  G. Singer,et al.  Comprehensive biodiversity analysis via ultra-deep patterned flow cell technology: a case study of eDNA metabarcoding seawater , 2019, bioRxiv.

[22]  J. Castresana,et al.  A pipeline for metabarcoding and diet analysis from fecal samples developed for a small semi-aquatic mammal , 2018, PloS one.

[23]  Vanessa A. Mata,et al.  How much is enough? Effects of technical and biological replication on metabarcoding dietary analysis , 2018, Molecular ecology.

[24]  M. A. Senar,et al.  The choice of universal primers and the characteristics of the species mixture determine when DNA metabarcoding can be quantitative , 2018, Molecular ecology.

[25]  A. Angerbjörn,et al.  Fish consumption of harbour seals (Phoca vitulina) in north western Iceland assessed by DNA metabarcoding and morphological analysis , 2018, Polar Biology.

[26]  M. Galan,et al.  Metabarcoding for the parallel identification of several hundred predators and their preys: application to bat species diet analysis , 2017, bioRxiv.

[27]  B. Deagle,et al.  Counting with DNA in metabarcoding studies: How should we convert sequence reads to dietary data? , 2018, bioRxiv.

[28]  H. Toju,et al.  DNA metabarcoding of spiders, insects, and springtails for exploring potential linkage between above- and below-ground food webs , 2018, Zoological Letters.

[29]  P. Taberlet,et al.  Environmental DNA: For Biodiversity Research and Monitoring , 2018 .

[30]  Vanessa A. Mata,et al.  Agriculture shapes the trophic niche of a bat preying on multiple pest arthropods across Europe: Evidence from DNA metabarcoding , 2018, Molecular ecology.

[31]  C. Guinet,et al.  Combining hard-part and DNA analyses of scats with biologging and stable isotopes can reveal different diet compositions and feeding strategies within a fur seal population , 2017 .

[32]  A. Eloranta,et al.  European catfish (Silurus glanis) as a freshwater apex predator drives ecosystem via its diet adaptability , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[33]  Kristy Deiner,et al.  Environmental DNA metabarcoding: Transforming how we survey animal and plant communities , 2017, Molecular ecology.

[34]  Kristian Meissner,et al.  Assessing strengths and weaknesses of DNA metabarcoding‐based macroinvertebrate identification for routine stream monitoring , 2017 .

[35]  Brian Hayden,et al.  Diet tracing in ecology: Method comparison and selection , 2017 .

[36]  C. Dickman,et al.  Prey selection and dietary flexibility of three species of mammalian predator during an irruption of non-cyclic prey , 2017, Royal Society Open Science.

[37]  H. Weimerskirch,et al.  High occurrence of jellyfish predation by black‐browed and Campbell albatross identified by DNA metabarcoding , 2017, Molecular ecology.

[38]  M. Bunce,et al.  Assessing the trophic ecology of top predators across a recolonisation frontier using DNA metabarcoding of diets , 2017 .

[39]  Dáithí C. Murray,et al.  DNA metabarcoding for diet analysis and biodiversity: A case study using the endangered Australian sea lion (Neophoca cinerea) , 2017, Ecology and evolution.

[40]  B. Deagle,et al.  Harbour seals target juvenile salmon of conservation concern , 2017 .

[41]  L. Waits,et al.  Comparing morphological and molecular diet analyses and fecal DNA sampling protocols for a terrestrial carnivore , 2017 .

[42]  M. Traugott,et al.  Comparing three types of dietary samples for prey DNA decay in an insect generalist predator , 2017, bioRxiv.

[43]  Francis K. C. Hui,et al.  boral – Bayesian Ordination and Regression Analysis of Multivariate Abundance Data in r , 2016 .

[44]  B. Deagle,et al.  Quantitative DNA metabarcoding: improved estimates of species proportional biomass using correction factors derived from control material , 2016, Molecular ecology resources.

[45]  Jameal F. Samhouri,et al.  Ecosystem context and historical contingency in apex predator recoveries , 2016, Science Advances.

[46]  S. Majaneva,et al.  The use of DNA barcodes in food web construction-terrestrial and aquatic ecologists unite! , 2016, Genome.

[47]  Michał Bogdziewicz,et al.  Diet composition of the Eurasian otter Lutra lutra in different freshwater habitats of temperate Europe: a review and meta‐analysis , 2016 .

[48]  K. Walker,et al.  Agricultural Management and Climatic Change Are the Major Drivers of Biodiversity Change in the UK , 2016, PloS one.

[49]  C. Fonseca,et al.  Perspectives on the Iberian wolf in Portugal: population trends and conservation threats , 2016, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[50]  T. Gerwing,et al.  Diet reconstruction using next-generation sequencing increases the known ecosystem usage by a shorebird , 2016 .

[51]  Menna E. Jones,et al.  Disease-induced decline of an apex predator drives invasive dominated states and threatens biodiversity. , 2016, Ecology.

[52]  P. Ferreras,et al.  Functional responses to changes in rabbit abundance: is the eagle owl a generalist or a specialist predator? , 2016, European Journal of Wildlife Research.

[53]  P. Taberlet,et al.  obitools: a unix‐inspired software package for DNA metabarcoding , 2016, Molecular ecology resources.

[54]  Vasco Elbrecht,et al.  Can DNA-Based Ecosystem Assessments Quantify Species Abundance? Testing Primer Bias and Biomass—Sequence Relationships with an Innovative Metabarcoding Protocol , 2015, PloS one.

[55]  J. Piñol,et al.  Universal and blocking primer mismatches limit the use of high‐throughput DNA sequencing for the quantitative metabarcoding of arthropods , 2015, Molecular ecology resources.

[56]  Bettina Thalinger,et al.  Molecular prey identification in Central European piscivores , 2015, Molecular ecology resources.

[57]  S. Wratten,et al.  Faeces of generalist predators as 'biodiversity capsules': A new tool for biodiversity assessment in remote and inaccessible habitats , 2015 .

[58]  J. Lanszki,et al.  Diet and Feeding Habits of the Eurasian Otter (Lutra lutra): Experiences from Post mortem Analysis , 2015 .

[59]  L. Harrington,et al.  Fish selection by riverine Eurasian otters in lowland England , 2015, Mammal Research.

[60]  W. Ripple,et al.  Novel trophic cascades: apex predators enable coexistence. , 2015, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[61]  M. Heithaus,et al.  Factors affecting individual foraging specialization and temporal diet stability across the range of a large “generalist” apex predator , 2015, Oecologia.

[62]  M. Wilkinson,et al.  Quantitative evaluation of bias in PCR amplification and next-generation sequencing derived from metabarcoding samples , 2015, Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry.

[63]  M. TonnWilliam,et al.  Fish diversity and biomass in northern Canadian lakes: northern lakes are more diverse and have greater biomass than expected based on species–energy theory , 2014 .

[64]  C. Layman,et al.  Diet variation of a generalist fish predator, grey snapper Lutjanus griseus, across an estuarine gradient: trade-offs of quantity for quality? , 2014, Journal of fish biology.

[65]  R. Barrientos,et al.  Eurasian otters modify their trophic niche after the introduction of non-native prey in Mediterranean fresh waters , 2014, Biological Invasions.

[66]  D. Grémillet,et al.  Changes in prey availability impact the foraging behaviour and fitness of Cape gannets over a decade , 2014 .

[67]  M. Gilbert,et al.  Second generation sequencing and morphological faecal analysis reveal unexpected foraging behaviour by Myotis nattereri (Chiroptera, Vespertilionidae) in winter , 2014, Frontiers in Zoology.

[68]  D. Holdich,et al.  The North American signal crayfish, with particular reference to its success as an invasive species in Great Britain , 2014 .

[69]  Daniel H. Thornton,et al.  Prey switching as a means of enhancing persistence in predators at the trailing southern edge , 2014, Global change biology.

[70]  Kabir G. Peay,et al.  Sequence Depth, Not PCR Replication, Improves Ecological Inference from Next Generation DNA Sequencing , 2014, PloS one.

[71]  F. Altermatt,et al.  Transport Distance of Invertebrate Environmental DNA in a Natural River , 2014, PloS one.

[72]  A. Diamond,et al.  From Puffins to Plankton: A DNA-Based Analysis of a Seabird Food Chain in the Northern Gulf of Maine , 2013, PloS one.

[73]  Mark Hebblewhite,et al.  Wolves, white-tailed deer, and beaver: implications of seasonal prey switching for woodland caribou declines , 2013 .

[74]  B. Deagle,et al.  Quantifying sequence proportions in a DNA‐based diet study using Ion Torrent amplicon sequencing: which counts count? , 2013, Molecular ecology resources.

[75]  V. Ranwez,et al.  A new versatile primer set targeting a short fragment of the mitochondrial COI region for metabarcoding metazoan diversity: application for characterizing coral reef fish gut contents , 2013, Frontiers in Zoology.

[76]  Paolo Vezza,et al.  Do non-native fish as prey favour the conservation of the threatened indigenous Eurasian otter? , 2013 .

[77]  Daniel Sabatier,et al.  Unveiling the Diet of Elusive Rainforest Herbivores in Next Generation Sequencing Era? The Tapir as a Case Study , 2013, PloS one.

[78]  N. Reid,et al.  Review and quantitative meta-analysis of diet suggests the Eurasian otter (Lutra lutra) is likely to be a poor bioindicator , 2013 .

[79]  Ping Xie,et al.  Seasonal Trophic Niche Shift and Cascading Effect of a Generalist Predator Fish , 2012, PloS one.

[80]  Yi Wang,et al.  mvabund– an R package for model‐based analysis of multivariate abundance data , 2012 .

[81]  P. Taberlet,et al.  Who is eating what: diet assessment using next generation sequencing , 2012, Molecular ecology.

[82]  P. Taberlet,et al.  Environmental DNA , 2012, Molecular ecology.

[83]  D. Warton,et al.  Distance‐based multivariate analyses confound location and dispersion effects , 2012 .

[84]  James Haile,et al.  DNA-Based Faecal Dietary Analysis: A Comparison of qPCR and High Throughput Sequencing Approaches , 2011, PloS one.

[85]  T. Václavík,et al.  Otters vs. fishermen: Stakeholders’ perceptions of otter predation and damage compensation in the Czech Republic , 2011 .

[86]  J. Rabaça,et al.  Superpredation increases mercury levels in a generalist top predator, the eagle owl , 2011, Ecotoxicology.

[87]  S. Harris,et al.  Diet determination of the Cape Mountain leopards using global positioning system location clusters and scat analysis , 2011 .

[88]  Andy J. Green,et al.  The paradigm of body condition: a critical reappraisal of current methods based on mass and length , 2010 .

[89]  M. Delibes,et al.  Natural, human and spatial constraints to expanding populations of otters in the Iberian Peninsula , 2010 .

[90]  William N. Venables,et al.  Modern Applied Statistics with S , 2010 .

[91]  Jingyuan Song,et al.  Use of ITS2 Region as the Universal DNA Barcode for Plants and Animals , 2010, PloS one.

[92]  C. Prigioni,et al.  Eurasian otter (Lutra lutra) prey selection in response to a variation of fish abundance , 2010 .

[93]  A. Green,et al.  New perspectives for estimating body condition from mass/length data: the scaled mass index as an alternative method , 2009 .

[94]  T. Gelatt,et al.  Development and application of DNA techniques for validating and improving pinniped diet estimates. , 2009, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[95]  B. Deagle,et al.  Analysis of Australian fur seal diet by pyrosequencing prey DNA in faeces , 2009, Molecular ecology.

[96]  J. Jiménez,et al.  Diet diversity and breeding of top predators are determined by habitat stability and structure: a case study with the Eurasian otter (Lutra lutra L.) , 2009, European Journal of Wildlife Research.

[97]  J. Kubečka,et al.  Size Selectivity in Summer and Winter Diets of Great Cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo ): Does it Reflect Season-Dependent Difference in Foraging Efficiency? , 2008 .

[98]  Rodolphe E. Gozlan,et al.  Do Eurasian otters Lutra lutra (L.) in the Somerset Levels prey preferentially on non-native fish species? , 2008 .

[99]  J. Prenda,et al.  Eurasian otter (Lutra lutra) diet and prey selection in Mediterranean streams invaded by centrarchid fishes , 2008, Biological Invasions.

[100]  B. Williams,et al.  Current status and temporal trends in stocks of European eel in England and Wales , 2007 .

[101]  Ruth M. Casper,et al.  Detecting prey from DNA in predator scats: a comparison with morphological analysis, using Arctocephalus seals fed a known diet , 2007 .

[102]  A. M. Correia Seasonal and interspecific evaluation of predation by mammals and birds on the introduced red swamp crayfish Procambarus clarkii (Crustacea, Cambaridae) in a freshwater marsh (Portugal) , 2006 .

[103]  J. Bell,et al.  Detection of secondary predation by PCR analyses of the gut contents of invertebrate generalist predators , 2005, Molecular ecology.

[104]  Jonathan M. Chase,et al.  Trophic cascades across ecosystems , 2005, Nature.

[105]  M. Hindell,et al.  Molecular scatology as a tool to study diet: analysis of prey DNA in scats from captive Steller sea lions , 2005, Molecular ecology.

[106]  Daniel N. Miller,et al.  Confluence effects in rivers: Interactions of basin scale, network geometry, and disturbance regimes , 2004 .

[107]  Elizabeth T. Borer,et al.  A cross-ecosystem comparison of the strength of trophic cascades , 2002 .

[108]  A. Ibbotson,et al.  Colonisation of freshwater habitats by the European eel Anguilla anguilla , 2002 .

[109]  W. Symondson Molecular identification of prey in predator diets , 2002, Molecular ecology.

[110]  I. Boyd,et al.  Monitoring a marine ecosystem using responses of upper trophic level predators , 2001 .

[111]  E. Korpimäki,et al.  Diet variation of common buzzards in Finland supports the alternative prey hypothesis , 2001 .

[112]  V. Křivan,et al.  Alternative Food, Switching Predators, and the Persistence of Predator‐Prey Systems , 2001, The American Naturalist.

[113]  V. Sidorovich,et al.  Feeding habits of the otter and the American mink in Białowieża Primeval Forest (Poland) compared to other Eurasian populations , 2001 .

[114]  P. Beja An analysis of otter Lutra lutra predation on introduced American crayfish Procambarus clarkii in Iberian streams , 1996 .

[115]  D. N. Carss,et al.  Errors associated with otter Lutra lutra faecal analysis. I. Assessing general diet from spraints , 1996 .

[116]  J. Watt Seasonal and area‐related variations in the diet of otters Lutra lutra on Mull , 1995 .

[117]  T. M. Heggberget,et al.  Prey selection in coastal Eurasian otters Lutra Iutra , 1994 .

[118]  R. Vrijenhoek,et al.  DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. , 1994, Molecular marine biology and biotechnology.

[119]  Miles M. Coburn,et al.  A comparative study of percid scales (Teleostei: Perciformes) , 1992 .

[120]  P. Beja Diet of otters (Lutra lutra) in closely associated freshwater, brackish and marine habitats in south‐west Portugal , 1991 .

[121]  H. Kruuk,et al.  Seasonal and spatial differences in food selection by otters (Lutra lutra) in Shetland , 1990 .

[122]  M. Delibes,et al.  Food habits of the otter (Lutra lutra) in two habitats of the Doñana National Park, SW Spain , 1987 .

[123]  S. Erlinge Demography and dynamics of a stoat Mustela erminea population in a diverse community of vertebrates , 1983 .

[124]  W. Murdoch Switching in General Predators: Experiments on Predator Specificity and Stability of Prey Populations , 1969 .

[125]  M. Čech,et al.  Do otters target the same fish species and sizes as anglers? A case study from a lowland trout stream (Czech Republic) , 2017 .

[126]  Janina Decker,et al.  Amphibians And Reptiles , 2016 .

[127]  D. Forman Predation of newts (Salamandridae, Pleurodelinae) by Eurasian otters Lutra lutra (Linnaeus) , 2015 .

[128]  H. Kruuk OTTERS AND EELS: LONG-TERM OBSERVATIONS ON DECLINES IN SCOTLAND , 2014 .

[129]  J. Mysiak,et al.  Otters Causing Conflicts The Fish Farming Case of the Czech Republic , 2013 .

[130]  C. Sayer,et al.  Changes in the diet of a recovering Eurasian otter population between the 1970s and 2010 , 2012 .

[131]  V. M. Lukasik,et al.  Spatial and Temporal Variation of Coyote (Canis latrans) Diet in Calgary, Alberta , 2011 .

[132]  D. Forman,et al.  Diet of coastal foraging Eurasian otters (Lutra lutra L.) in Pembrokeshire south-west Wales , 2010, European Journal of Wildlife Research.

[133]  Carsten F. Dormann,et al.  Introducing the bipartite Package: Analysing Ecological Networks , 2008 .

[134]  A. Walker,et al.  Status of eel fisheries, stocks and their management in England and Wales , 2008 .

[135]  Ose,et al.  AMPHIBIAN AND REPTILE CONSUMPTION BY OTTERS ( LUTRA LUTRA ) IN A COASTAL AREA IN SOUTHERN IBERIAN PENINSULA , 2007 .

[136]  S. Poláková,et al.  Winter predation by otter (Lutra lutra) on carp pond systems in South Bohemia (Czech Republic) , 2007 .

[137]  J. Pegg,et al.  Revealing the prey items of the otter Lutra lutra in South West England using stomach contents analysis , 2006 .

[138]  M. Delibes,et al.  Influence of spatial heterogeneity on coastal otter (Lutra lutra) prey consumption , 2004 .

[139]  G. Copp,et al.  Range and diet of Eurasian otters Lutra lutra (L.) in the catchment of the River Lee (south-east England) since re-introduction , 2003 .

[140]  R. Miranda,et al.  Guía de identificación de restos óseos de los Ciprínidos presentes en España. Escamas, opérculos, cleitros y arcos faríngeos , 2002 .

[141]  P. Sibley,et al.  MONITORING THE DISTRIBUTION OF CRAYFISH IN ENGLAND AND WALES , 2002 .

[142]  M. Olsson,et al.  The otter (Lutra lutra) in Sweden--population trends in relation to sigma DDT and total PCB concentrations during 1968-99. , 2001, Environmental pollution.

[143]  P. Krausman,et al.  Observer bias and analysis of gray wolf diets from scats. , 2000 .

[144]  G. Pierce,et al.  Guide to the identification of North Sea fish using premaxillae and vertebrae , 1997 .

[145]  H. Kruuk Wild Otters: Predation and Populations , 1995 .

[146]  S. R. Wild,et al.  Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in the British environment: sinks, sources and temporal trends. , 1994, Environmental pollution.

[147]  R. Libois,et al.  Eléments pour l'identification des restes crâniens des poissons dulçaquicoles de Belgique et du Nord de la France. 1. Anguilliformes, Gastérosteiformes, Cyprinodontiformes et Perciformes , 1987 .