Online Participation in the UK: Testing a ‘Contextualised’ Model of Internet Effects 1

This article offers a new test of the mobilisation thesis of Internet effects on individual political participation using data from an NOP survey of 1,972 UK adults during May 2002. The analysis differs from that of previous studies in that it significantly widens the understanding of the dependent variable—online participation—as well as introducing new Internet-specific variables as explanatory factors for this new type of participation. Using this broader ‘contextualised’ model of online political activity we find support for the idea that the Internet is expanding the numbers of the politically active, specifically in terms of reaching groups that are typically inactive or less active in conventional or offline forms of politics. In drawing these conclusions our article joins with a growing body of literature calling for the re-evaluation of the so-called normalisation thesis which argues that ultimately the Internet will lead to a further narrowing of the pool of politically active citizens by reinforcing existing levels of engagement. At a broader level we consider the findings point to the need for scholars in the area to work towards a more sophisticated theoretical and empirical modelling of participation in the online environment.

[1]  John Street Politics and Technology , 1992 .

[2]  E. Uslaner Trust, Civic Engagement, and the Internet , 2004 .

[3]  Lawrence Lessig,et al.  Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace , 1999 .

[4]  Wayne Rash,et al.  Politics on the nets: wiring the political process , 1997 .

[5]  M. F.,et al.  Bibliography , 1985, Experimental Gerontology.

[6]  Greg Elmer,et al.  Spaces of Surveillance: Indexicality and Solicitation on the Internet. , 1997 .

[7]  Bruce Bimber Information and Political Engagement in America: The Search for Effects of Information Technology at the Individual Level , 2001 .

[8]  R. Huckfeldt,et al.  Citizens, Politics and Social Communication: Information and Influence in an Election Campaign , 1995 .

[9]  Frederic I. Solop Digital Democracy Comes of Age: Internet Voting and the 2000 Arizona Democratic Primary Election , 2001, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[10]  K. A. Hill,et al.  Cyberpolitics: Citizen Activism in the Age of the Internet , 1998 .

[11]  P. Norris,et al.  Knows Little, Learns Less? An Experimental Study of the Impact of the Media on Learning , 2001 .

[12]  Dietram A. Scheufele,et al.  Being a Citizen Online , 2002 .

[13]  P. Howard,et al.  Research Methodology , 2000 .

[14]  Bruce Bimber Information and American Democracy: Contents , 2003 .

[15]  Kenneth Newton,et al.  The European Consortium for Political Research , 1991 .

[16]  Caroline J. Tolbert,et al.  Unraveling the Effects of the Internet on Political Participation? , 2003 .

[17]  Mike Schmierbach,et al.  Nonrecursive Models of Internet Use and Community Engagement: Questioning Whether Time Spent Online Erodes Social Capital , 2002 .

[18]  P. Seyd,et al.  The Politics of Anti-Partyism , 1996 .

[19]  C. Sunstein Republic.com , 2001 .

[20]  Brian S. Krueger Assessing the Potential of Internet Political Participation in the United States , 2002 .

[21]  Oren Etzioni,et al.  Face-to-Face and Computer-Mediated Communities, A Comparative Analysis , 1999, Inf. Soc..

[22]  P. Howard,et al.  Method and Representation in Internet-Based Survey Tools— Mobility, Community, and Cultural Identity in Survey2000 , 2000 .

[23]  M. Poster CyberDemocracy: Internet and the Public Sphere , 2013 .

[24]  Esther Dyson,et al.  Release 2.0: A Design for Living in the Digital Age , 1998 .

[25]  S. Menard Applied Logistic Regression Analysis , 1996 .

[26]  Keith N. Hampton,et al.  Does the Internet Increase, Decrease, or Supplement Social Capital? , 2001 .

[27]  Richard A. Davis,et al.  New Media and American Politics , 1998 .

[28]  S. Iyengar The Method is the Message: The Current State of Political Communication Research , 2001 .

[29]  R. Gibson,et al.  Elections Online: Assessing Internet Voting in Light of the Arizona Democratic Primary , 2001 .

[30]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Internet paradox. A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? , 1998, The American psychologist.

[31]  Mark Cenite Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace , 2000 .

[32]  Howard Rheingold,et al.  The Virtual Community: Finding Commection in a Computerized World , 1993 .

[33]  Waiting for the great leap forward. , 2000, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[34]  R. Michael Alvarez,et al.  The Likely Consequences of Internet Voting for Political Representation , 2001 .

[35]  Peter A. Chow-White,et al.  Digital Divide , 2018, Oxford Bibliographies Online Datasets.

[36]  Dhavan V. Shah, Nojin Kwak, R. Lance Holbert "Connecting" and "Disconnecting" With Civic Life: Patterns of Internet Use and the Production of Social Capital , 2001 .

[37]  William Wresch,et al.  Democracy in the Digital Age: Challenges to Political Life in Cyberspace , 2001, Inf. Soc..

[38]  Dhavan V. Shah,et al.  "Connecting" and "Disconnecting" With Civic Life: Patterns of Internet Use and the Production of Social Capital , 2001 .

[39]  N. Nie,et al.  Internet and society: a preliminary report , 2001 .

[40]  A. Toffler,et al.  Creating a new civilization : the politics of the Third Wave , 1995 .

[41]  M. Ruffin On being digital. , 1995, Physician executive.