ASDIN: Percutaneous Renal Biopsy: Outpatient Observation without Hospitalization Is Safe

Percutaneous renal biopsy may be complicated by hemorrhage. Patients are frequently hospitalized for overnight observation. We evaluated prospectively the feasibility and safety of an outpatient renal biopsy protocol. During a 20‐month period, 100 consecutive patients underwent outpatient renal biopsy using a standardized protocol. The biopsy was performed by Nephrology Fellows, under direct faculty supervision. All biopsies were carried out under real‐time ultrasound guidance with a 16‐gauge spring‐loaded biopsy gun, and followed immediately by color Doppler ultrasound to exclude active bleeding. Blood pressure, heart rate, hemoglobin, and hematocrit were monitored for 8 hours postbiopsy. If there were no complications, the patients were discharged home after the observation period. A total of 91 patients required one or two needle passes, and nine needed three or four passes. A mean of 12.7 ± 9.7 glomeruli were obtained per patient. No major complications were encountered. A small (<2 × 2 cm) perinephric hematoma was observed postbiopsy in 13 patients. Four patients were hospitalized for overnight observation due to a >4% decrease in their hematocrit, but none required a transfusion or intervention. No patient experienced a delayed biopsy‐related complication. Outpatient, real‐time, ultrasound‐guided percutaneous renal biopsy is safe and effective, and minimizes the need for postbiopsy hospitalization. It can result in significant cost savings without exposing the patients to an increased risk of complications.

[1]  S. Bhandari,et al.  Safety of outpatient kidney biopsy: one center's experience with 178 native kidney biopsies. , 2008, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[2]  E. Oviasu,et al.  Evaluation of percutaneous renal biopsy as a day case procedure: experience from Nigeria. , 1998, Journal of nephrology.

[3]  E. Ritz,et al.  Safety of ultrasound-guided percutaneous renal biopsy-retrospective analysis of 1090 consecutive cases. , 1998, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[4]  S. Korbet,et al.  Timing of complications in percutaneous renal biopsy: what is the optimal period of observation? , 1996, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[5]  K. Fairley,et al.  Renal biopsy as an outpatient procedure. , 1995, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[6]  M. Gregory,et al.  Percutaneous native renal biopsy: comparison of a 1.2-mm spring-driven system with a traditional 2-mm hand-driven system. , 1994, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[7]  M. Schwartz,et al.  The use of the automatic core biopsy system in percutaneous renal biopsies: a comparative study. , 1993, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[8]  P. Allan,et al.  Conventional 15 G needle technique for renal biopsy compared with ultrasound-guided spring-loaded 18 G needle biopsy. , 1992, The British journal of radiology.

[9]  B. Murphy,et al.  Percutaneous renal biopsy as a day-patient procedure. , 1989, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[10]  W. Whittier,et al.  Timing of complications in percutaneous renal biopsy. , 2004, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[11]  D. Wheeler,et al.  Experience with a new method for percutaneous renal biopsy. , 1991, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.