Ultrasound and biochemical predictors of pregnancy outcome at diagnosis of early-onset fetal growth restriction

Background: Severe early-onset fetal growth restriction (FGR) causes significant fetal and neonatal mortality and morbidity. Predicting the outcome of affected pregnancies at the time of diagnosis is difficult, preventing accurate patient counselling. We investigated the use of maternal serum protein and ultrasound measures at diagnosis to predict fetal or neonatal death and three secondary outcomes: fetal death or delivery [≤]28+0 weeks; development of abnormal umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry; slow fetal growth. Methods: Women with singleton pregnancies (n=142, estimated fetal weights [EFWs] <3rd centile, <600g 20+0-26+6 weeks of gestation, no known chromosomal, genetic or major structural abnormalities), were recruited from four European centres. Maternal serum from the discovery set (n=63) was analysed for seven proteins linked to angiogenesis, 90 additional proteins associated with cardiovascular disease and five proteins identified through pooled liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Patient and clinician stakeholder priorities were used to select models tested in the validation set (n=60), with final models calculated from combined data. Results: The most discriminative model for fetal or neonatal death included EFW z-score (Hadlock 3 formula/Marsal chart), gestational age and umbilical artery Doppler category (AUC 0.91, 95%CI 0.86-0.97) but was less well calibrated than the model containing only EFW z-score (Hadlock3/Marsal). The most discriminative model for fetal death or delivery [≤]28+0 weeks included maternal serum placental growth factor (PlGF) concentration and umbilical artery Doppler category (AUC 0.89, 95%CI 0.83-0.94). Conclusion: Ultrasound measurements and maternal serum PlGF concentration at diagnosis of severe early-onset FGR predict pregnancy outcomes of importance to patients and clinicians.

[1]  J. Kingdom,et al.  Diagnostic Utility of Serial Circulating Placenta Growth Factor Levels and Uterine Artery Doppler Waveforms to Diagnose Underlying Placental Diseases in Pregnancies at High-Risk of Placental Dysfunction. , 2022, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[2]  E. Camm,et al.  Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Implications of Growth Restriction: Mechanisms and Potential Treatments , 2021, International journal of molecular sciences.

[3]  Nadezhda T. Doncheva,et al.  The STRING database in 2021: customizable protein–protein networks, and functional characterization of user-uploaded gene/measurement sets , 2020, Nucleic Acids Res..

[4]  A. Sharp,et al.  Investigation and management of the small for gestational age fetus , 2020 .

[5]  Z. Alfirevic,et al.  The PLANES study: a protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility study of the placental growth factor (PlGF) blood test-informed care versus standard care alone for women with a small for gestational age fetus at or after 32 + 0 weeks’ gestation , 2020, Pilot and Feasibility Studies.

[6]  N. McGovern,et al.  Phenotypic and functional characterization of first-trimester human placental macrophages, Hofbauer cells , 2020, bioRxiv.

[7]  J. James,et al.  The placenta in fetal growth restriction: What is going wrong? , 2020, Placenta.

[8]  D. Lawlor,et al.  A maternal serum metabolite ratio predicts fetal growth restriction at term , 2020, Nature Medicine.

[9]  J. Kingdom,et al.  The Placental Basis of Fetal Growth Restriction. , 2020, Obstetrics and gynecology clinics of North America.

[10]  Mariane Bertagnolli,et al.  Immune and Apoptosis Mechanisms Regulating Placental Development and Vascularization in Preeclampsia , 2020, Frontiers in Physiology.

[11]  John F. Timms,et al.  Improved early detection of ovarian cancer using longitudinal multimarker models , 2020, British Journal of Cancer.

[12]  E. Johnstone,et al.  Evaluating the accuracy and precision of sonographic fetal weight estimation models in extremely early‐onset fetal growth restriction , 2020, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[13]  N. Marlow,et al.  Comparative analysis of 2‐year outcomes in GRIT and TRUFFLE trials , 2020, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[14]  J. Limpens,et al.  Early‐onset fetal growth restriction: A systematic review on mortality and morbidity , 2019, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[15]  E. Johnstone,et al.  Women's lived experiences of a prenatal diagnosis of fetal growth restriction at the limits of viability: An interpretative phenomenological study. , 2019, Midwifery.

[16]  A. David,et al.  Pregnant women’s experiences and perceptions of participating in the EVERREST prospective study; a qualitative study , 2019, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.

[17]  A. E. Rodrigues Baião,et al.  Predictors of perinatal outcome in early‐onset fetal growth restriction: A study from an emerging economy country , 2020, Prenatal diagnosis.

[18]  L. Magee,et al.  The hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: ISSHP classification, diagnosis & management recommendations for international practice. , 2018, Pregnancy hypertension.

[19]  John F. Timms,et al.  Parenclitic networks for predicting ovarian cancer , 2018, Oncotarget.

[20]  A. David,et al.  The role of aspirin, heparin, and other interventions in the prevention and treatment of fetal growth restriction. , 2017, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[21]  Dr. Malka Urwah,et al.  ESTIMATION OF FETAL WEIGHT WITH THE USE OF HEAD, BODY AND FEMUR MEASUREMENTS – A PROSPECTIVE STUDY , 2018 .

[22]  A. David Maternal uterine artery VEGF gene therapy for treatment of intrauterine growth restriction. , 2017, Placenta.

[23]  Z. Alfirevic,et al.  Fetal and umbilical Doppler ultrasound in high-risk pregnancies. , 2017, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[24]  P. D. Nicola,et al.  International estimated fetal weight standards of the INTERGROWTH‐21st Project , 2017, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[25]  B. Mol,et al.  Re: Consensus definition for placental fetal growth restriction: a Delphi procedure , 2017, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[26]  J. Hutcheon,et al.  Placental growth factor as a marker of fetal growth restriction caused by placental dysfunction. , 2016, Placenta.

[27]  Neil J Sebire,et al.  Sampling and Definitions of Placental Lesions: Amsterdam Placental Workshop Group Consensus Statement. , 2016, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[28]  H. Zeisler,et al.  The sFlt-1:PlGF Ratio in Women with Suspected Preeclampsia. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[29]  Gary S Collins,et al.  Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD Statement , 2015, BMC Medicine.

[30]  J. Duffield,et al.  The Role of Pericyte Detachment in Vascular Rarefaction , 2014, Journal of Vascular Research.

[31]  E. Gratacós,et al.  Angiogenic factors at diagnosis of late-onset small-for-gestational age and histological placental underperfusion. , 2014, Placenta.

[32]  F Prefumo,et al.  Practice Guidelines , 2013 .

[33]  D. Altman,et al.  Intra‐ and interobserver variability in fetal ultrasound measurements , 2012, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[34]  J. Kleijnen,et al.  Fetal umbilical artery Doppler to predict compromise of fetal/neonatal wellbeing in a high risk population: systematic review and bivariate meta-analysis , 2010, Archives of Disease in Childhood: Fetal and Neonatal Edition.

[35]  K. Maršál,et al.  Obstetric management of intrauterine growth restriction. , 2009, Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology.

[36]  F. Figueras,et al.  Reference ranges for uterine artery mean pulsatility index at 11–41 weeks of gestation , 2008, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[37]  Aeilko H. Zwinderman,et al.  Use of uterine artery Doppler ultrasonography to predict pre-eclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction: a systematic review and bivariable meta-analysis , 2008, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[38]  S. Pocock,et al.  Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. , 2007, Annals of internal medicine.

[39]  N. Anderson,et al.  Sonographic estimation of fetal weight: comparison of bias, precision and consistency using 12 different formulae , 2007, Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[40]  M. Zugaib,et al.  Detection of fetal structural abnormalities at the 11–14 week ultrasound scan , 2002, Prenatal diagnosis.

[41]  A. Selbing,et al.  Intrauterine growth curves based on ultrasonically estimated foetal weights , 1996, Acta paediatrica.

[42]  K. Maršál,et al.  Uterine artery color Doppler assisted veloeimetry and perinatal outcome , 1996, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[43]  Patrick Royston,et al.  Comment on sg3.4 and an Improved D'Agostino Test , 1992 .

[44]  D. Strobino,et al.  Precision of umbilical artery Doppler studies. Intraobserver, interobserver, and biologic variability of fetal Doppler velocimetry. , 1991, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[45]  R. D'Agostino,et al.  A Suggestion for Using Powerful and Informative Tests of Normality , 1990 .

[46]  Domenico Arduini,et al.  Normal values of Pulsatility Index front fetal vessels: A cross-sectional study on 1556 healthy fetuses , 1990, Journal of perinatal medicine.

[47]  K Marsál,et al.  Umbilical Artery and Uteroplacental Blood Flow Velocity Waveforms in Normal Pregnancy — A Cross‐Sectional Study , 1988, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.