Collective Cognition in Humans: Groups Outperform Their Best Members in a Sentence Reconstruction Task

Group-living is widespread among animals and one of the major advantages of group-living is the ability of groups to solve cognitive problems that exceed individual ability. Humans also make use of collective cognition and have simultaneously developed a highly complex language to exchange information. Here we investigated collective cognition of human groups regarding language use in a realistic situation. Individuals listened to a public announcement and had to reconstruct the sentence alone or in groups. This situation is often encountered by humans, for instance at train stations or airports. Using recent developments in machine speech recognition, we analysed how well individuals and groups reconstructed the sentences from a syntactic (i.e., the number of errors) and semantic (i.e., the quality of the retrieved information) perspective. We show that groups perform better both on a syntactic and semantic level than even their best members. Groups made fewer errors and were able to retrieve more information when reconstructing the sentences, outcompeting even their best group members. Our study takes collective cognition studies to the more complex level of language use in humans.

[1]  Paul C. Tetlock,et al.  The Promise of Prediction Markets , 2008, Science.

[2]  D. Helbing,et al.  How social influence can undermine the wisdom of crowd effect , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  P. R. Laughlin,et al.  Groups Perform Better than the Best Individuals on Letters-to-numbers Problems: Effects of Group Size Two-letter Substitution Strategy , 2003 .

[4]  R D Sorkin,et al.  Signal-detection analysis of group decision making. , 2001, Psychological review.

[5]  C. List,et al.  Group decisions in humans and animals: a survey , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[6]  N. Kerr,et al.  Group performance and decision making. , 2004, Annual review of psychology.

[7]  Stefan Krause,et al.  Swarm intelligence in animals and humans. , 2010, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[8]  Edmund A. Mennis.  The Wisdom of Crowds: Why the Many Are Smarter than the Few and How Collective Wisdom Shapes Business, Economies, Societies, and Nations , 2006 .

[9]  James H. Martin,et al.  Speech and Language Processing: An Introduction to Natural Language Processing, Computational Linguistics, and Speech Recognition , 2000 .

[10]  P. R. Laughlin,et al.  Groups perform better than the best individuals on letters-to-numbers problems: effects of group size. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  D. Sumpter,et al.  Fast and accurate decisions through collective vigilance in fish shoals , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  L. V. Williams,et al.  Prediction Markets , 2003 .

[13]  Dominic D. P. Johnson,et al.  The Origins and Evolution of Leadership , 2009, Current Biology.

[14]  P. Latham,et al.  References and Notes Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Figs. S1 to S11 References Movie S1 Optimally Interacting Minds R�ports , 2022 .

[15]  Volker Sommer,et al.  Performance of human groups in social foraging: the role of communication in consensus decision making , 2010, Biology Letters.

[16]  Richard James,et al.  Swarm intelligence in humans: diversity can trump ability , 2011, Animal Behaviour.

[17]  Edward A. Codling,et al.  Navigation in human crowds; testing the many-wrongs principle , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[18]  Barbara Webb,et al.  Swarm Intelligence: From Natural to Artificial Systems , 2002, Connect. Sci..

[19]  Andrew J. King,et al.  Is the true ‘wisdom of the crowd’ to copy successful individuals? , 2012, Biology Letters.

[20]  Jens Krause,et al.  Accurate decisions in an uncertain world: collective cognition increases true positives while decreasing false positives , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[21]  Virginia Teller.  Review of Speech and language processing: an introduction to natural language processing, computational linguistics, and speech recognition by Daniel Jurafsky and James H. Martin. Prentice Hall 2000. , 2000 .

[22]  Andrew J. King,et al.  Swarm Intelligence in Animal Groups: When Can a Collective Out-Perform an Expert? , 2010, PloS one.

[23]  J. R. Larson,et al.  Assembly bonus effect or typical group performance ? a comment on Michaelsen, Watson, and Black (1989) , 1992 .

[24]  Andrew T. Hartnett,et al.  This PDF file includes: Materials and Methods SOM Text Figs. S1 to S12 Table S1 Full Reference List , 2022 .

[25]  R. R. Krausz.  Living in Groups , 2013 .

[26]  H. Guetzkow,et al.  A social psychology of group processes for decision-making , 1964 .

[27]  Andrew M Simons,et al.  Many wrongs: the advantage of group navigation. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[28]  A. Dornhaus,et al.  Decision making by small and large house-hunting ant colonies: one size fits all , 2006, Animal Behaviour.

[29]  W. Noble,et al.  Human Evolution, Language and Mind: A Psychological and Archaeological Inquiry , 1996 .

[30]  Cass R. Sunstein,et al.  Group Judgments: Statistical Means, Deliberation, and Information Markets , 2005 .

[31]  I. Couzin.  Collective cognition in animal groups , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[32]  András Liker,et al.  Larger groups are more successful in innovative problem solving in house sparrows , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.