A multiobjective optimization based framework to balance the global exploration and local exploitation in expensive optimization

In many engineering optimization problems, objective function evaluations can be extremely computationally expensive. The effective global optimization (EGO) is a widely used approach for expensive optimization. Balance between global exploration and local exploitation is a very important issue in designing EGO-like algorithms. This paper proposes a multiobjective optimization based EGO (EGO-MO) for addressing this issue. In EGO-MO, a global surrogate model for the objective function is firstly constructed using some initial database of designs. Then, a multiobjective optimization problem (MOP) is formulated, in which two objectives measure the global exploration and local exploitation. At each generation, the multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition is used for solving the MOP. Several solutions selected from the obtained Pareto front are evaluated. In such a way, it can generate multiple test solutions simultaneously to take the advantage of parallel computing and reduce the computational time. Numerical experiments on a suite of test problems have shown that EGO-MO outperforms EGO in terms of iteration numbers.

[1]  Xin Yao,et al.  Decomposition-Based Memetic Algorithm for Multiobjective Capacitated Arc Routing Problem , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[2]  Andy J. Keane,et al.  Recent advances in surrogate-based optimization , 2009 .

[3]  R. Storn,et al.  Differential Evolution: A Practical Approach to Global Optimization (Natural Computing Series) , 2005 .

[4]  Stefan Görtz,et al.  Hierarchical Kriging Model for Variable-Fidelity Surrogate Modeling , 2012 .

[5]  Shinkyu Jeong,et al.  Optimization of Nonlinear Lateral Characteristic of Lifting-Body Type Reentry Vehicle , 2009, J. Aerosp. Comput. Inf. Commun..

[6]  Qingfu Zhang,et al.  MOEA/D: A Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithm Based on Decomposition , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[7]  Andy J. Keane,et al.  On the Design of Optimization Strategies Based on Global Response Surface Approximation Models , 2005, J. Glob. Optim..

[8]  Qingfu Zhang,et al.  Multiobjective Optimization Problems With Complicated Pareto Sets, MOEA/D and NSGA-II , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[9]  M. Sasena,et al.  Exploration of Metamodeling Sampling Criteria for Constrained Global Optimization , 2002 .

[10]  Andy J. Keane,et al.  Cokriging for Robust Design Optimization , 2012 .

[11]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  Metamodels for Computer-based Engineering Design: Survey and recommendations , 2001, Engineering with Computers.

[12]  Donald R. Jones,et al.  Efficient Global Optimization of Expensive Black-Box Functions , 1998, J. Glob. Optim..

[13]  Hans-Martin Gutmann,et al.  A Radial Basis Function Method for Global Optimization , 2001, J. Glob. Optim..

[14]  Qingfu Zhang,et al.  MOEA/D for flowshop scheduling problems , 2008, 2008 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence).

[15]  Zhiwei Feng,et al.  Control-structure integrated multiobjective design for flexible spacecraft using MOEA/D , 2014 .

[16]  Qingfu Zhang,et al.  Expensive Multiobjective Optimization by MOEA/D With Gaussian Process Model , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[17]  Donald R. Jones,et al.  A Taxonomy of Global Optimization Methods Based on Response Surfaces , 2001, J. Glob. Optim..

[18]  S. Obayashi,et al.  Multiobjective Aerodynamic Optimization of Supersonic Wings Using Navier-Stokes Equations , 2000 .

[19]  M. M. Ali,et al.  Differential evolution algorithms using hybrid mutation , 2007, Comput. Optim. Appl..

[20]  William J. Welch,et al.  Computer experiments and global optimization , 1997 .

[21]  Markus P. Rumpfkeil,et al.  Optimizations Under Uncertainty Using Gradients, Hessians, and Surrogate Models , 2013 .

[22]  T. J. Mitchell,et al.  Exploratory designs for computational experiments , 1995 .

[23]  Leifur Þ. Leifsson,et al.  Surrogate-Based Aerodynamic Shape Optimization by Variable-Resolution Models , 2013 .