Advanced Beamformers for Cochlear Implant Users: Acute Measurement of Speech Perception in Challenging Listening Conditions

Objective To investigate the performance of monaural and binaural beamforming technology with an additional noise reduction algorithm, in cochlear implant recipients. Method This experimental study was conducted as a single subject repeated measures design within a large German cochlear implant centre. Twelve experienced users of an Advanced Bionics HiRes90K or CII implant with a Harmony speech processor were enrolled. The cochlear implant processor of each subject was connected to one of two bilaterally placed state-of-the-art hearing aids (Phonak Ambra) providing three alternative directional processing options: an omnidirectional setting, an adaptive monaural beamformer, and a binaural beamformer. A further noise reduction algorithm (ClearVoice) was applied to the signal on the cochlear implant processor itself. The speech signal was presented from 0° and speech shaped noise presented from loudspeakers placed at ±70°, ±135° and 180°. The Oldenburg sentence test was used to determine the signal-to-noise ratio at which subjects scored 50% correct. Results Both the adaptive and binaural beamformer were significantly better than the omnidirectional condition (5.3 dB±1.2 dB and 7.1 dB±1.6 dB (p<0.001) respectively). The best score was achieved with the binaural beamformer in combination with the ClearVoice noise reduction algorithm, with a significant improvement in SRT of 7.9 dB±2.4 dB (p<0.001) over the omnidirectional alone condition. Conclusions The study showed that the binaural beamformer implemented in the Phonak Ambra hearing aid could be used in conjunction with a Harmony speech processor to produce substantial average improvements in SRT of 7.1 dB. The monaural, adaptive beamformer provided an averaged SRT improvement of 5.3 dB.

[1]  T Ricketts,et al.  Comparison of performance across three directional hearing aids. , 1999, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[2]  Peter J Blamey,et al.  Adaptive Dynamic Range Optimization for Cochlear Implants: A Preliminary Study , 2002, Ear and hearing.

[3]  B Kollmeier,et al.  Development and evaluation of a German sentence test for objective and subjective speech intelligibility assessment. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  HamacherV.,et al.  Signal processing in high-end hearing aids , 2005 .

[5]  M. Dorman,et al.  Performance of subjects fit with the Advanced Bionics CII and Nucleus 3G cochlear implant devices. , 2004, Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery.

[6]  Gary W. Elko,et al.  A simple adaptive first-order differential microphone , 1995, Proceedings of 1995 Workshop on Applications of Signal Processing to Audio and Accoustics.

[7]  Astrid van Wieringen,et al.  Speech Understanding in Background Noise with the Two-Microphone Adaptive Beamformer BEAM™ in the Nucleus Freedom™ Cochlear Implant System , 2006, Ear and hearing.

[8]  Jace Wolfe,et al.  Benefit of a Commercially Available Cochlear Implant Processor With Dual-Microphone Beamforming: A Multi-Center Study , 2012, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[9]  M Kompis,et al.  Performance of an adaptive beamforming noise reduction scheme for hearing aid applications. I. Prediction of the signal-to-noise-ratio improvement. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  J M Kates Superdirective arrays for hearing aids , 1993, Proceedings of IEEE Workshop on Applications of Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics.

[11]  P M Zurek,et al.  Robustness of an adaptive beamforming method for hearing aids. , 1990, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[12]  Fan-Gang Zeng,et al.  Effects of directional microphone and adaptive multichannel noise reduction algorithm on cochlear implant performance. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  J M Kates,et al.  A comparison of hearing-aid array processing techniques. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  Henning Puder,et al.  Signal Processing in High-End Hearing Aids: State of the Art, Challenges, and Future Trends , 2005, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[15]  R. Bentler Effectiveness of directional microphones and noise reduction schemes in hearing aids: a systematic review of the evidence. , 2005, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[16]  T Ricketts,et al.  Directivity Quantification in Hearing Aids: Fitting and Measurement Effects , 2000, Ear and hearing.

[17]  G M Clark,et al.  Evaluation of a portable two-microphone adaptive beamforming speech processor with cochlear implant patients. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  Mark E Lutman,et al.  Speech Recognition and Comfort Using Hearing Instruments with Adaptive Directional Characteristics in Asymmetric Listening Conditions , 2005, Ear and hearing.

[19]  Alison M Brockmeyer,et al.  Evaluation of different signal processing options in unilateral and bilateral cochlear freedom implant recipients using R-Space background noise. , 2011, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[20]  M Kompis,et al.  Performance of an adaptive beamforming noise reduction scheme for hearing aid applications. II. Experimental verification of the predictions. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  Binaural VoiceStream Technology ® Intelligent binaural algorithms to improve speech understanding , 2012 .

[22]  V Hamacher,et al.  Evaluation of noise reduction systems for cochlear implant users in different acoustic environment. , 1997, The American journal of otology.

[23]  Thomas Lenarz,et al.  Results of a Pilot Study With a Signal Enhancement Algorithm for HiRes 120 Cochlear Implant Users , 2010, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[24]  Aaron Parkinson,et al.  Simultaneous Bilateral Cochlear Implantation in Adults: A Multicenter Clinical Study , 2006, Ear and hearing.

[25]  Wolfgang Gaggl,et al.  Recognition of Speech Presented at Soft to Loud Levels by Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients of Three Cochlear Implant Systems , 2004, Ear and hearing.

[26]  Todd Ricketts,et al.  Evaluation of an adaptive, directional-microphone hearing aid: Evaluación de un auxiliar auditivo de micrófono direccional adaptable , 2002, International journal of audiology.

[27]  James F Patrick,et al.  The Development of the Nucleus® Freedom™ Cochlear Implant System , 2006, Trends in amplification.

[28]  René H Gifford,et al.  Speech perception for adult cochlear implant recipients in a realistic background noise: effectiveness of preprocessing strategies and external options for improving speech recognition in noise. , 2010, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[29]  Ryan W McCreery,et al.  An evidence-based systematic review of directional microphones and digital noise reduction hearing aids in school-age children with hearing loss. , 2012, American journal of audiology.

[30]  Adam A. Hersbach,et al.  Combining Directional Microphone and Single-Channel Noise Reduction Algorithms: A Clinical Evaluation in Difficult Listening Conditions With Cochlear Implant Users , 2012, Ear and hearing.

[31]  P M Zurek,et al.  Evaluation of an adaptive beamforming method for hearing aids. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  J Vanden Berghe,et al.  Speech Recognition in Noise for Cochlear Implantees with a Two-Microphone Monaural Adaptive Noise Reduction System , 2001, Ear and hearing.

[33]  Yi Hu,et al.  Single and Multiple Microphone Noise Reduction Strategies in Cochlear Implants , 2012, Trends in amplification.

[34]  Jörn Ostermann,et al.  Signal Processing Strategies for Cochlear Implants Using Current Steering , 2011, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[35]  Piers Dawes,et al.  Unilateral and bilateral hearing aids, spatial release from masking and auditory acclimatization. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.