SPIRAL out of convexity: sparsity-regularized algorithms for photon-limited imaging

The observations in many applications consist of counts of discrete events, such as photons hitting a detector, which cannot be effectively modeled using an additive bounded or Gaussian noise model, and instead require a Poisson noise model. As a result, accurate reconstruction of a spatially or temporally distributed phenomenon (f*) from Poisson data (y) cannot be accomplished by minimizing a conventional l2-l1 objective function. The problem addressed in this paper is the estimation of f* from y in an inverse problem setting, where (a) the number of unknowns may potentially be larger than the number of observations and (b) f* admits a sparse representation. The optimization formulation considered in this paper uses a negative Poisson log-likelihood objective function with nonnegativity constraints (since Poisson intensities are naturally nonnegative). This paper describes computational methods for solving the constrained sparse Poisson inverse problem. In particular, the proposed approach incorporates key ideas of using quadratic separable approximations to the objective function at each iteration and computationally efficient partition-based multiscale estimation methods.

[1]  Robert D. Nowak,et al.  A statistical multiscale framework for Poisson inverse problems , 2000, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[2]  R. Nowak,et al.  Multiscale likelihood analysis and complexity penalized estimation , 2004, math/0406424.

[3]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  Decoding by linear programming , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[4]  Pierre Moulin,et al.  Complexity-regularized denoising of Poisson-corrupted data , 2000, Proceedings 2000 International Conference on Image Processing (Cat. No.00CH37101).

[5]  D. Hunter,et al.  A Tutorial on MM Algorithms , 2004 .

[6]  Joel A. Tropp,et al.  Just relax: convex programming methods for identifying sparse signals in noise , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[7]  Robert D. Nowak,et al.  Multiscale Poisson Intensity and Density Estimation , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[8]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  Near-Optimal Signal Recovery From Random Projections: Universal Encoding Strategies? , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[9]  Zachary T. Harmany,et al.  Sparse poisson intensity reconstruction algorithms , 2009, 2009 IEEE/SP 15th Workshop on Statistical Signal Processing.

[10]  Jean-Luc Starck,et al.  Astronomical Data Analysis and Sparsity: From Wavelets to Compressed Sensing , 2009, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[11]  J. Borwein,et al.  Two-Point Step Size Gradient Methods , 1988 .

[12]  Robert D. Nowak,et al.  Multiscale Modeling and Estimation of Poisson Processes with Application to Photon-Limited Imaging , 1999, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[13]  Mário A. T. Figueiredo,et al.  Gradient Projection for Sparse Reconstruction: Application to Compressed Sensing and Other Inverse Problems , 2007, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[14]  A. Hero,et al.  Penalized maximum-likelihood image reconstruction using space-alternating generalized EM algorithms , 1995, 5th IEEE EMBS International Summer School on Biomedical Imaging, 2002..

[15]  Jeffrey A. Fessler,et al.  Globally convergent image reconstruction for emission tomography using relaxed ordered subsets algorithms , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[16]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Convex Optimization , 2004, Algorithms and Theory of Computation Handbook.

[17]  R. Tibshirani Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso , 1996 .

[18]  Rebecca Willett,et al.  Performance bounds on compressed sensing with Poisson noise , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory.

[19]  L. Shepp,et al.  A Statistical Model for Positron Emission Tomography , 1985 .

[20]  Stephen J. Wright,et al.  Sparse Reconstruction by Separable Approximation , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[21]  Donald L. Snyder,et al.  Random point processes , 1975 .

[22]  Jeffrey A. Fessler,et al.  A paraboloidal surrogates algorithm for convergent penalized-likelihood emission image reconstruction , 1998, 1998 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record. 1998 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (Cat. No.98CH36255).

[23]  Robert D. Nowak,et al.  Platelets: a multiscale approach for recovering edges and surfaces in photon-limited medical imaging , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[24]  D. Rubin,et al.  Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM - algorithm plus discussions on the paper , 1977 .

[25]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  Robust uncertainty principles: exact signal reconstruction from highly incomplete frequency information , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[26]  Alfred O. Hero,et al.  Ieee Transactions on Image Processing: to Appear Penalized Maximum-likelihood Image Reconstruction Using Space-alternating Generalized Em Algorithms , 2022 .

[27]  Volkan Cevher,et al.  Model-Based Compressive Sensing , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[28]  Jeffrey A. Fessler,et al.  Sparsity regularization for image reconstruction with Poisson data , 2009, Electronic Imaging.

[29]  E. Kolaczyk WAVELET SHRINKAGE ESTIMATION OF CERTAIN POISSON INTENSITY SIGNALS USING CORRECTED THRESHOLDS , 1999 .