Global backtracking of anthropogenic radionuclides by means of a receptor oriented ensemble dispersion modelling system in support of Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty verification

Abstract In this paper, we introduce a methodology for quality assessment of backtracking models. We present results illustrating the level of agreement between the backtracking models, and the accuracy of each model and the ensemble model in resolving the geo-temporal reference of a single point source. Both assessments are based on an ensemble of 12 different Lagrangian particle dispersion modelling (LPDM) systems utilized in receptor oriented (adjoint) mode during an international numerical experiment dedicated to source region estimation. As major result, we can confirm that the findings of Galmarini et al. [2004b. Ensemble prediction forecasting—Part II: application and evaluation. Atmospheric Environment 38, 4619–4632] and Delle Monache and Stull [2003. An ensemble air-quality forecast over Europe during an ozone episode. Atmospheric Environment 37, 3469–3474], regarding the superiority of the ensemble dispersion forecast over a single forecast, do also apply to LPDM when utilized for backtracking purposes, in particular if only vague a priori knowledge of the source time is available. This, however, is a likely situation in the context of the global nuclear monitoring performed by the Provisional Technical Secretariat (PTS) of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization (CTBTO), where quick but reliable source location identification is required. We introduce a simple methodology as a template for a future electronic emergency response system in the field of dispersion modelling.

[1]  L. Delle Monache,et al.  An ensemble air-quality forecast over western Europe during an ozone episode , 2003 .

[2]  Trainer,et al.  The influence of canadian forest fires on pollutant concentrations in the united states , 2000, Science.

[3]  Toshiki Iwasaki,et al.  Tracer transport model at Japan meteorological agency and its application to the ETEX data , 1998 .

[4]  A. Stohl,et al.  Technical note: The Lagrangian particle dispersion model FLEXPART version 6.2 , 2005 .

[5]  Petra Seibert,et al.  Source-receptor matrix calculation with a Lagrangian particle dispersion model in backward mode , 2004 .

[6]  Réal D’Amours,et al.  A Zeroth Order Lagrangian Particle Dispersion Model MLDP0 , 2004 .

[7]  Walter F. Dabberdt,et al.  Uncertainty, ensembles and air quality dispersion modeling: applications and challenges , 2000 .

[8]  Ulla Wandinger,et al.  Transport of boreal forest fire emissions from Canada , 2001 .

[9]  R. Bellasio,et al.  A statistical methodology for the evaluation of long-range dispersion models: an application to the ETEX exercise , 1998 .

[10]  Zoltan Toth,et al.  A Synoptic Evaluation of the NCEP Ensemble , 1997 .

[11]  Barbara Fay,et al.  Evaluation of Eulerian and Lagrangian atmospheric transport models at the Deutscher Wetterdienst using anatex surface tracer data , 1995 .

[12]  Anne Grete Straume,et al.  A More Extensive Investigation of the Use of Ensemble Forecasts for Dispersion Model Evaluation , 2001 .

[13]  R. J. Lagomarsino,et al.  Across North America tracer experiment (ANATEX): Sampling and analysis , 1991 .

[14]  Petr Firbas,et al.  Introduction to the verification regime of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty , 1999 .

[15]  Barbara Fay,et al.  Evaluation of the emergency dispersion model at the deutscher wetterdienst using ETEX data , 1998 .

[16]  G. Grell,et al.  A description of the fifth-generation Penn State/NCAR Mesoscale Model (MM5) , 1994 .

[17]  R. H. Maryon,et al.  Validation of the UK Met. Office’s name model against the ETEX dataset , 1998 .

[18]  Petra Seibert,et al.  Iverse Modelling with a Lagrangian Particle Disperion Model: Application to Point Releases Over Limited Time Intervals , 2004 .

[19]  H. Schlager,et al.  Lagrangian Analysis of Processes Influencing Long-Range Transport of Pollutants across the North Atlantic , 2005 .

[20]  M. Sofiev,et al.  Ensemble dispersion forecasting—Part I: concept, approach and indicators , 2004 .

[21]  Andreas Becker,et al.  Continuous four-dimensional source attribution for the Berlin area during two days in July 1994. Part I : The new Euler-Lagrange-model system LaMM5 , 2001 .

[22]  Petra Seibert,et al.  Uncertainties in atmospheric dispersion modelling and source determination , 2000 .

[23]  Gerhard Wotawa,et al.  Inter‐ and intra‐continental transport of radioactive cesium released by boreal forest fires , 2006 .

[24]  R. Pielke,et al.  A comprehensive meteorological modeling system—RAMS , 1992 .

[25]  Roland R. Draxler,et al.  Evaluation of an ensemble dispersion calculation , 2003 .

[26]  R. Draxler.  The Use of Global and Mesoscale Meteorological Model Data to Predict the Transport and Dispersion of Tracer Plumes over Washington, D.C. , 2006 .

[27]  Fausto Medici,et al.  The IMS radionuclide network of the CTBT , 2001 .

[28]  A. Stohl,et al.  Validation of the lagrangian particle dispersion model FLEXPART against large-scale tracer experiment data , 1998 .

[29]  M. Ehrendorfer.  Vorhersage der Unsicherheit numerischer Wetterprognosen: eine Übersicht , 1997 .

[30]  R. Draxler.  An Overview of the HYSPLIT_4 Modelling System for Trajectories, Dispersion, and Deposition , 1998 .

[31]  Gerhard Wotawa,et al.  Atmospheric transport modelling in support of CTBT verification—overview and basic concepts , 2003 .

[32]  R Bellasio,et al.  Forecasting the consequences of accidental releases of radionuclides in the atmosphere from ensemble dispersion modelling. , 2001, Journal of environmental radioactivity.

[33]  Torben Mikkelsen,et al.  Ensemble dispersion forecasting—Part II: application and evaluation , 2004 .

[34]  Auer,et al.  Low level radioactivity measurement in support of the CTBTO. Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization , 2000, Applied radiation and isotopes : including data, instrumentation and methods for use in agriculture, industry and medicine.

[35]  A. Simmons,et al.  The ECMWF operational implementation of four‐dimensional variational assimilation. I: Experimental results with simplified physics , 2007 .

[36]  F. Molteni,et al.  The ECMWF Ensemble Prediction System: Methodology and validation , 1996 .