A Statistical Basis for Speech Sound Discrimination

Infants under six months are able to discriminate native and non-native consonant contrasts equally well, but as they learn the phonological systems of their native language, this ability declines. Current explanations of this phenome non agree that the decline indiscrimination ability is linked to the formation of native-language phonemic categories. The goal of this study was to evaluate the role of input statistics in learning these categories: our hypothesis was that relative frequency is a determinant of the relative order in which categories are acquired. English-learning infants of two age groups (6.5 months and 8.5 months) were tested on their ability to discriminate non-native consonant contrasts using the Conditioned Head Turn Procedure. As predicted, older infants were worse in their performance on the more frequent coronal stop contrast than on the less frequent dorsal stop contrast. In contrast, 6.5-month-olds discriminated both contrasts equally well. An adult control group tested with an AX task also discriminated both contrast sequally. These results provide preliminary confirmation of the hypothesis that frequency plays an important role in tuning of phonological systems to properties of the native language. A simple attractor model suffices to account for these and previous results on loss of discrimination of non-native-language contrasts and suggests that the technique of measuring graded loss of multiple contrasts, in combination with observation of inputfrequencies, can offer a powerful methodof assessing infants' phonological representations.

[1]  C. Best,et al.  Examination of perceptual reorganization for nonnative speech contrasts: Zulu click discrimination by English-speaking adults and infants. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  J. Grier,et al.  Nonparametric indexes for sensitivity and bias: computing formulas. , 1971, Psychological bulletin.

[3]  P. Ladefoged.  A course in phonetics , 1975 .

[4]  R. Fox.  Modularity and the Motor Theory of Speech Perception , 1994 .

[5]  P K Kuhl,et al.  Perceptual strategies in prelingual speech segmentation , 1993, Journal of Child Language.

[6]  J. Werker,et al.  Influences on infant speech processing: toward a new synthesis. , 1999, Annual review of psychology.

[7]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  Phonotactic and Prosodic Effects on Word Segmentation in Infants , 1999, Cognitive Psychology.

[8]  P. Smolensky,et al.  The Initial and Final States: Theoretical Implications and Experimental Explorations of Richness of the Base , 2004 .

[9]  J. Werker,et al.  Newborn infants’ sensitivity to perceptual cues to lexical and grammatical words , 1999, Cognition.

[10]  E. Newport,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article INCIDENTAL LANGUAGE LEARNING: Ustening (and Learning) out of the Comer of Your Ear , 2022 .

[11]  J. Pind.  The Discovery of Spoken Language, Peter W. Jusczyk (Ed.). MIT Press (1997), ISBN 0 262 10058 4 , 1997 .

[12]  K. Behnke.  The acquisition of phonetic categories in young infants: A self-organising artificial neural network approach , 1998 .

[13]  Mary E. Hughes,et al.  Boston University Conference on Language Development , 1979 .

[14]  Linda Polka,et al.  The Conditioned head turn procedure as a method for testing infant speech perception , 1997 .

[15]  H. Nusbaum,et al.  The development of speech perception : the transition from speech sounds to spoken words , 1997 .

[16]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: a first report. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  Catherine T. Best,et al.  Learning to perceive the sound pattern of english , 1995 .

[18]  R. N. Indah.  Language and Speech , 1958, Nature.

[19]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Lesioning an attractor network: investigations of acquired dyslexia. , 1991, Psychological review.

[20]  P. Jusczyk.  From general to language-specific capacities: the WRAPSA Model of how speech perception develops , 1993 .

[21]  David C. Plaut,et al.  The emergence of phonology from the interplay of speech comprehension and production ; A distributed connectionist approach , 1998 .

[22]  J. Werker,et al.  Developmental changes in perception of nonnative vowel contrasts. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  L. Polka.  Cross-language speech perception in adults: phonemic, phonetic, and acoustic contributions. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  B. MacWhinney.  The CHILDES project: tools for analyzing talk , 1992 .

[25]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Effects of early linguistic experience on speech discrimination by infants: a critique of Eiler, Gavin, and Wilson (1979). , 1980, Child development.

[26]  P. D. Eimas,et al.  Speech Perception in Infants , 1971, Science.

[27]  G. E. Peterson,et al.  Control Methods Used in a Study of the Vowels , 1951 .

[28]  Linda Polka,et al.  Developmental changes in speech perception: new challenges and new directions , 1993 .

[29]  J S Logan,et al.  Cross-language evidence for three factors in speech perception , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[30]  Catherine T. Best,et al.  Emergence of Language-Specific Constraints in Perception of Non-Native Speech: A Window on Early Phonological Development , 1993 .

[31]  J. Werker,et al.  Developmental aspects of cross-language speech perception. , 1981, Child development.

[32]  Norman A. Krasnegor,et al.  Measurement of Audition and Vision in the First Year of Postnatal Life: A Methodological Overview , 1985 .

[33]  Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al.  Dynamical models of sentence processing , 1999, Cogn. Sci..

[34]  Joan L. Bybee,et al.  Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure , 2001 .

[35]  Ian Maddieson,et al.  Patterns of sounds , 1986 .

[36]  Jessica Maye,et al.  Infant sensitivity to distributional information can affect phonetic discrimination , 2002, Cognition.

[37]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  Infants' sensitivity to phonotactic patterns in the native language. , 1994 .

[38]  J. Sawusch,et al.  Lexical neighborhood effects in phonetic processing. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[39]  Kay Atkinson-King,et al.  A First Language: The Early Stages , 1975 .

[40]  A G Samuel,et al.  An empirical and meta-analytic evaluation of the phoneme identification task. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[41]  E. R. Siqueland,et al.  The nature and structure of infant form categories , 1983 .

[42]  M. Gazzaniga.  The new cognitive neurosciences, 2nd ed. , 2000 .

[43]  R. Brown,et al.  A First Language , 1973 .

[44]  S. Trehub.  The Discrimination of Foreign Speech Contrasts by Infants and Adults. , 1976 .

[45]  J. Werker,et al.  Cross-language speech perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life , 1984 .

[46]  S. Blumstein,et al.  Lexical effects on the phonetic categorization of speech: the role of acoustic structure. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[47]  J. Werker,et al.  Adult and infant perception of two English phones. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[48]  P. Kuhl.  Effects of language experience on speech perception , 1998 .

[49]  Relative Occurrence of Phonemes in American English , 1959 .

[50]  W. Strange,et al.  The acquisition of /r/ and /l/ by Japanese learners of English: Evidence that speech production can precede speech perception , 1982, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[51]  C. W. Carter,et al.  The words and sounds of telephone conversations , 1930 .

[52]  J. L. Miller,et al.  Phonetic prototypes: influence of place of articulation and speaking rate on the internal structure of voicing categories. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[53]  K. Stevens,et al.  Linguistic experience alters phonetic perception in infants by 6 months of age. , 1992, Science.

[54]  R N Aslin,et al.  Statistical Learning by 8-Month-Old Infants , 1996, Science.

[55]  D. Pisoni,et al.  The Handbook of Speech Perception , 2004 .

[56]  P. Kuhl.  Human adults and human infants show a “perceptual magnet effect” for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[57]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Effects of early linguistic experience on speech discrimination by infants: a critique of Eilers , 1980 .

[58]  P. D. Eimas,et al.  Evidence for Representations of Perceptually Similar Natural Categories by 3-Month-Old and 4-Month-Old Infants , 1993, Perception.

[59]  Janet F. Werker,et al.  Cross-language speech perception: Developmental change does not involve loss , 1994 .

[60]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  Linguistic experience and infant speech perception: a re-examination of Eilers, Gavin & Oller (1982) , 1984, Journal of Child Language.

[61]  Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al.  Parsing in a Dynamical System: An Attractor-based Account of the Interaction of Lexical and Structural Constraints in Sentence Processing , 1997 .

[62]  E. Newport,et al.  Computation of Conditional Probability Statistics by 8-Month-Old Infants , 1998 .

[63]  Janet B. Pierrehumbert,et al.  Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition and contrast , 2000 .