The Assessment of Intraobserver and Interobserver Error in the Measurement of Noncongenital Scoliosis in Children ≤ 10 Years of Age

Study Design. Retrospective review of scoliosis radiographs. Objectives. To determine measurement variability in children ≤ 10 years of age with noncongenital scoliosis. Summary of Background Data. Measurement variability in congenital and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis has been studied. There is no study of measurement variability in young children with noncongenital scoliosis. Methods. A retrospective review of children ≤ 10 years of age followed for noncongenital scoliosis was performed. End vertebrae were identified on radiographs, and the curves were measured (Cobb method) twice by each of six observers. The same soft lead pencil and goniometer was used. Intraobserver and interobserver variability for continuous data was determined. Results. There were 64 children. The diagnosis was infantile/juvenile idiopathic scoliosis in 42, neuromuscular scoliosis in 7, scoliosis associated with mesenchymal disorders or other syndromes in 12, and unknown in 3 children. The curve was thoracic in 54, thoracolumbar in 8, and lumbar in 2. There were 19 left and 45 right curves. The average age was 6.6 ± 2.6 years. There were a total of 768 Cobb angle measurements with an average Cobb angle of 38 ± 22° (range, 10°–115°). Intraobserver variability was ± 6°; interobserver variability was ± 7°. Conclusion. In children ≤10 years of age with noncongenital scoliosis, intraobserver measurement variability in Cobb angle measurement is ± 6° and interobserver variability is ±7°. To be certain that there is a significant difference between Cobb angle measurements in children with noncongenital scoliosis and ≤ 10 years of age there must be a change of at least ±7°.

[1]  A. Beckett,et al.  AKUFO AND IBARAPA. , 1965, Lancet.

[2]  S J Dwyer,et al.  Computerized measurement and analysis of scoliosis: a more accurate representation of the shape of the curve. , 1980, Radiology.

[3]  J. Goin,et al.  A clinical study of the differences between the scoliotic angles measured on posteroanterior and anteroposterior radiographs. , 1982, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[4]  E. Bleck,et al.  The Significance of Roentgenographic Measurement in Scoliosis , 1982, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[5]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[6]  H Labelle,et al.  Observer Variation in Assessing Spinal Curvature and Skeletal Development in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis , 1988, Spine.

[7]  J O'Connor,et al.  Reliability of the Cobb angle index derived by traditional and computer assisted methods. , 1989, Australasian physical & engineering sciences in medicine.

[8]  E. Hall,et al.  Measurement of the Cobb angle on radiographs of patients who have scoliosis. Evaluation of intrinsic error. , 1990, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[9]  M. Ylikoski,et al.  Measurement variations in scoliotic angle, vertebral rotation, vertebral body height, and intervertebral disc space height. , 1990, Journal of spinal disorders.

[10]  J. Birch,et al.  Measurement of scoliosis and kyphosis radiographs. Intraobserver and interobserver variation. , 1990, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[11]  H Labelle,et al.  Diurnal Variation of Cobb Angle Measurement in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis , 1993, Spine.

[12]  M. Eliasziw,et al.  Statistical methodology for the concurrent assessment of interrater and intrarater reliability: using goniometric measurements as an example. , 1994, Physical therapy.

[13]  M A Schork,et al.  Variability in Cobb angle measurements in children with congenital scoliosis. , 1995, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[14]  R. Hensinger,et al.  Physeal slope in Perthes disease. , 1995, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[15]  D G Altman,et al.  Comparing two methods of clinical measurement: a personal history. , 1995, International journal of epidemiology.

[16]  S. Koop,et al.  Measurement Accuracy in Congenital Scoliosis , 2001, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[17]  V. Patel,et al.  Early or delayed surgical treatment of supracondylar humeral fractures in children. , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[18]  R. Hensinger,et al.  Statistical differences: consider the methodology. , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.