A role for midline and intralaminar thalamus in the associative blocking of Pavlovian fear conditioning

Fear learning occurs in response to positive prediction error, when the expected outcome of a conditioning trial exceeds that predicted by the conditioned stimuli present. This role for error in Pavlovian association formation is best exemplified by the phenomenon of associative blocking, whereby prior fear conditioning of conditioned stimulus (CS) A is able to prevent learning to CSB when they are conditioned in compound. The midline and intralaminar thalamic nuclei (MIT) are well-placed to contribute to fear prediction error because they receive extensive projections from the midbrain periaqueductal gray—which has a key role in fear prediction error—and project extensively to prefrontal cortex and amygdala. Here we used an associative blocking design to study the role of MIT in fear learning. In Stage I rats were trained to fear CSA via pairings with shock. In Stage II rats received compound fear conditioning of CSAB paired with shock. On test, rats that received Stage I training expressed less fear to CSB relative to control rats that did not receive this training. Microinjection of bupivacaine into MIT prior to Stage II training had no effect on the expression of fear during Stage II and had no effect on fear learning in controls, but prevented associative blocking and so enabled fear learning to CSB. These results show an important role for MIT in predictive fear learning and are discussed with reference to previous findings implicating the midline and posterior intralaminar thalamus in fear learning and fear responding.

[1]  Joseph E LeDoux,et al.  Topographic organization of convergent projections to the thalamus from the inferior colliculus and spinal cord in the rat , 1987, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[2]  G. McNally,et al.  Opioid Receptors in the Midbrain Periaqueductal Gray Regulate Extinction of Pavlovian Fear Conditioning , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  S. Spampinato,et al.  Opioid Receptors , 2015, Methods in Molecular Biology.

[4]  Joseph E LeDoux,et al.  Topographic organization of neurons in the acoustic thalamus that project to the amygdala , 1990, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[5]  David J. Anderson,et al.  Genetic dissection of an amygdala microcircuit that gates conditioned fear , 2010, Nature.

[6]  G. McNally,et al.  Complementary roles for amygdala and periaqueductal gray in temporal-difference fear learning. , 2008, Learning & memory.

[7]  H. Groenewegen,et al.  The specificity of the ‘nonspecific’ midline and intralaminar thalamic nuclei , 1994, Trends in Neurosciences.

[8]  G. Quirk,et al.  A time-dependent role of midline thalamic nuclei in the retrieval of fear memory , 2012, Neuropharmacology.

[9]  J. Moncho-Bogani,et al.  Unconditioned stimulus pathways to the amygdala: Effects of lesions of the posterior intralaminar thalamus on foot-shock-induced c-Fos expression in the subdivisions of the lateral amygdala , 2008, Neuroscience.

[10]  R. Rescorla,et al.  A theory of Pavlovian conditioning : Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement , 1972 .

[11]  D. Brunzell,et al.  Fear conditioning to tone, but not to context, is attenuated by lesions of the insular cortex and posterior extension of the intralaminar complex in rats. , 2001, Behavioral neuroscience.

[12]  A. Loewy,et al.  Periaqueductal gray matter projection to the parabrachial nucleus in rat , 1998, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[13]  J. Pearce,et al.  A model for Pavlovian learning: variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli. , 1980, Psychological review.

[14]  Joseph E LeDoux,et al.  Fear conditioning and LTP in the lateral amygdala are sensitive to the same stimulus contingencies , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[15]  J. Power,et al.  The amygdaloid complex: anatomy and physiology. , 2003, Physiological reviews.

[16]  Yonghui Li,et al.  Lesions of the posterior paraventricular nucleus of the thalamus attenuate fear expression , 2014, Front. Behav. Neurosci..

[17]  G. McNally,et al.  Opioid receptors in the midbrain periaqueductal gray regulate prediction errors during pavlovian fear conditioning. , 2006, Behavioral neuroscience.

[18]  M. Penzo,et al.  Fear Conditioning Potentiates Synaptic Transmission onto Long-Range Projection Neurons in the Lateral Subdivision of Central Amygdala , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  G. McNally,et al.  The role of prefrontal cortex in predictive fear learning. , 2010, Behavioral neuroscience.

[20]  G. Quirk,et al.  Neuronal signalling of fear memory , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[21]  J. Edeline,et al.  Stimulation at a site of auditory-somatosensory convergence in the medial geniculate nucleus is an effective unconditioned stimulus for fear conditioning. , 1992, Behavioral neuroscience.

[22]  M. Tabatabai,et al.  Mechanism of Action of Local Anesthetics on Synaptic Transmission in the Rat , 1990, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[23]  Joseph E LeDoux,et al.  Equipotentiality of thalamo-amygdala and thalamo-cortico-amygdala circuits in auditory fear conditioning , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[24]  Michael B. Stadler,et al.  Encoding of conditioned fear in central amygdala inhibitory circuits , 2010, Nature.

[25]  R. Marek,et al.  The amygdala and medial prefrontal cortex: partners in the fear circuit , 2013, The Journal of physiology.

[26]  H. T. Blair,et al.  Neural substrates for expectation-modulated fear learning in the amygdala and periaqueductal gray , 2010, Nature Neuroscience.

[27]  Peter A. Bandettini,et al.  Neural correlates of unconditioned response diminution during Pavlovian conditioning , 2008, NeuroImage.

[28]  L. Kamin,et al.  The conditioned emotional response as a function of intensity of the US. , 1961, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[29]  M. Bentivoglio,et al.  Thalamic midline cell populations projecting to the nucleus accumbens, amygdala, and hippocampus in the rat , 1990, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[30]  N. Mackintosh A Theory of Attention: Variations in the Associability of Stimuli with Reinforcement , 1975 .

[31]  L. Kamin Attention-like processes in classical conditioning , 1967 .

[32]  T. Robbins,et al.  Different types of fear-conditioned behaviour mediated by separate nuclei within amygdala , 1997, Nature.

[33]  H. Akil,et al.  Lesions of the Medial Geniculate Nuclei Specifically Block Corticosterone Release and Induction of c-fos mRNA in the Forebrain Associated with Audiogenic Stress in Rats , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[34]  R. F. Westbrook,et al.  Fear Conditioning and Long‐term Potentiation in the Amygdala , 2008, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[35]  Charles D. Kopec,et al.  Experience-dependent modification of a central amygdala fear circuit , 2013, Nature Neuroscience.

[36]  Joseph E LeDoux,et al.  Lesions of periaqueductal gray dissociate-conditioned freezing from conditioned suppression behavior in rats. , 1999, Learning & memory.

[37]  P. Coignet On specificity , 2003 .

[38]  H. T. Blair,et al.  Placing prediction into the fear circuit , 2011, Trends in Neurosciences.

[39]  Karim Nader,et al.  Memory consolidation of Pavlovian fear conditioning: a cellular and molecular perspective , 2001, Trends in Neurosciences.

[40]  Michael Davis,et al.  Pain Pathways Involved in Fear Conditioning Measured with Fear-Potentiated Startle: Lesion Studies , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[41]  G. Paxinos,et al.  The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates , 1983 .