Property and the cloud

Abstract Data is a modern form of wealth in the digital world, and massive amounts of data circulate in cloud environments. While this enormously facilitates the sharing of information, both for personal and professional purposes, it also introduces some critical problems concerning the ownership of the information. Data is an intangible good that is stored in large data warehouses, where the hardware architectures and software programs running the cloud services coexist with the data of many users. This context calls for a twofold protection: on one side, the cloud is made up of hardware and software that constitute the business assets of the service provider (property of the cloud); on the other side, there is a definite need to ensure that users retain control over their data (property in the cloud). The law grants protection to both sides under several perspectives, but the result is a complex mix of interwoven regimes, further complicated by the intrinsically international nature of cloud computing that clashes with the typical diversity of national laws. As the business model based on cloud computing grows, public bodies, and in particular the European Union, are striving to find solutions to properly regulate the future economy, either by introducing new laws, or by finding the best ways to apply existing principles.

[1]  Rosalie Steier Legally specking , 1989, CACM.

[2]  Alexandra Neri,et al.  海外情報 オンライン市場での侵害製品の販売 : 市場の運営者の責任 : 市場の運営者に対する差止命令に関する欧州連合司法裁判所判決 : L'Oreal and Others v. eBay International AG and Others (CJEU, 2011年7月12日, C-324/09) , 2011 .

[3]  Bennett B. Borden,et al.  Outrun the Lions: A Practical Framework for Analysis of Legal Issues in the Evolution of Cloud Computing , 2014 .

[4]  Giuseppina Cretella,et al.  Towards a Legislation-aware Cloud Computing Framework , 2015, Cloud Forward.

[5]  Paul Ehrlich Communications Decency Act 230 , 2002 .

[6]  Arto Ojala,et al.  Software-as-a-Service Revenue Models , 2013, IT Professional.

[7]  P. Garrouste,et al.  Looking for a Theory of the Firm: Future Challenges , 2005 .

[8]  Bob Cramblitt,et al.  InterviewAn interview with Ping Fu , 2009, Commun. ACM.

[9]  Jennifer Daskal,et al.  Law Enforcement Access to Data across Borders: The Evolving Security and Rights Issues , 2016 .

[10]  Enrique Sala Ledesma Sentencia del Tribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europea (Gran Sala), de 13 de mayo de 2014, asunto C-131/12, Google Spain SL y Google Inc. contra Agencia Española de Protección de Datos (AEPD) y Mario Costeja González: Derecho al olvido , 2015 .

[11]  Michelle Marie F. Villarica Tele2 Sverige AB v. Post-Och Telestyrelsen and Secretary of State for the Home Department v. Tom Watson, Peter Brice, and Geoffrey Lewis (C.J.E.U.) , 2018, International Legal Materials.

[12]  Chris Rose,et al.  A Break in the Clouds: Towards a Cloud Definition , 2011 .

[13]  Davide Maria Parrilli Software Patentability in a Grid Environment , 2008 .

[14]  P Samuelson CONTU revisited: the case against copyright protection for computer programs in machine-readable form. , 1984, Duke law journal.

[15]  Primavera De Filippi,et al.  Cloud Computing: Centralization and Data Sovereignty , 2012, Eur. J. Law Technol..

[16]  Monica Palmirani,et al.  A Cloud Service Broker with Legal-Rule Compliance Checking and Quality Assurance Capabilities , 2015, Cloud Forward.

[17]  Yves Le Traon,et al.  Cloud Providers Viability: How to Address it from an IT and Legal Perspective? , 2015, GECON.

[18]  Sanford J. Grossman,et al.  The Costs and Benefits of Ownership: A Theory of Vertical and Lateral Integration , 1986 .

[19]  Karen J. Kramer Extending Copyright Protection to a Computer Program's Structure. Whelan Associates, Inc. v. Jaslow Dental Laboratory, Inc. 797 F.2d 1222 (3d Cir. 1986) , 1987 .

[20]  Christopher Millard,et al.  Who is Responsible for 'Personal Data' in Cloud Computing? The Cloud of Unknowing, Part 2 , 2011 .

[21]  Giancarlo Frosio,et al.  Reforming Intermediary Liability in the Platform Economy: A European Digital Single Market Strategy , 2017 .

[22]  A. N. Yiannopoulos Introduction to the Law of Things: Louisiana and Comparative Law , 1962 .

[23]  E. K. Lau An Empirical Study of Software Piracy , 2003 .

[24]  Marcos Satanowsky Nature juridique de l'entreprise et du fonds de commerce , 1955 .

[25]  Jennifer Bretan Harboring Doubts about the Efficacy of 512 Immunity under the DMCA , 2003 .

[26]  Udo Helmbrecht Data protection and legal compliance in cloud computing , 2010, Datenschutz und Datensicherheit - DuD.

[27]  Vijay Mahajan,et al.  Software Piracy: Estimation of Lost Sales and the Impact on Software Diffusion , 1995 .

[28]  Randy H. Katz,et al.  A view of cloud computing , 2010, CACM.

[29]  Rolf H. Weber,et al.  Privacy and Legal Issues in Cloud Computing , 2015 .

[30]  Laurence Diver Would the current ambiguities within the legal protection of software be solved by the creation of a sui generis property right for computer programs , 2008 .

[31]  Christopher Millard,et al.  Contracts for clouds: comparison and analysis of the Terms and Conditions of cloud computing services , 2011, Int. J. Law Inf. Technol..

[32]  P. Sowjanya,et al.  SLAs in Cloud Systems : The Business Perspective , 2022 .

[33]  Martin Abrams The Origins of Personal Data and its Implications for Governance , 2014 .

[34]  Rolf H. Weber,et al.  The digital future - A challenge for privacy? , 2015, Comput. Law Secur. Rev..

[35]  T. Noble Foster,et al.  Navigating Through the Fog of Cloud Computing Contracts, 30 J. Marshall J. Info. Tech. & Privacy L.13 (2013) , 2013 .

[36]  Peggy Valcke,et al.  Did the Romans Get it Right? What Delfi, Google, eBay, and UPC TeleKabel Wien Have in Common , 2016 .

[37]  Michael A. Rappa,et al.  The utility business model and the future of computing services , 2004, IBM Syst. J..

[38]  Paul Ohm Broken Promises of Privacy: Responding to the Surprising Failure of Anonymization , 2009 .

[39]  Tal Z. Zarsky "MINE YOUR OWN BUSINESS!": MAKING THE CASE FOR THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE DATA MINING OF PERSONAL INFORMATION IN THE FORUM OF PUBLIC OPINION , 2003 .

[40]  Richard H. Stern Another Look At Copyright Protection of Software: Did the 1980 Act Do Anything For Object Code?, 3 Computer L.J. 1 (1981) , 1981 .

[41]  O. Hart,et al.  Property Rights and the Nature of the Firm , 1988, Journal of Political Economy.

[42]  Ariel Katz A Network Effects Perspective on Software Piracy , 2005 .

[43]  Chris Reed Information in the cloud: ownership, control and accountability , 2015 .

[44]  Garry L. Founds Shrinkwrap and Clickwrap Agreements: 2B or Not 2B? , 1999 .

[45]  Estelle Derclaye,et al.  Databases "sui generis" right: should we adopt the spin-off theory? , 2008 .

[46]  Robert L. Grossman,et al.  The Design of a Community Science Cloud: The Open Science Data Cloud Perspective , 2012, 2012 SC Companion: High Performance Computing, Networking Storage and Analysis.

[47]  Michael J. Meurer,et al.  Price Discrimination, Personal Use and Piracy: Copyright Protection of Digital Works , 1997 .

[48]  Cor-Paul Bezemer,et al.  Multi-tenant SaaS applications: maintenance dream or nightmare? , 2010, IWPSE-EVOL '10.

[49]  Mark A. Lemley Convergence in the Law of Software Copyright , 1995 .

[50]  Peter S. Menell An Analysis of the Scope of Copyright Protection for Application Programs , 1989 .

[51]  Peter P. Swire,et al.  Why the Right to Data Portability Likely Reduces Consumer Welfare: Antitrust and Privacy Critique , 2013 .

[52]  Sebastian Haunss,et al.  Political discourse networks and the conflict over software patents in Europe , 2012 .

[53]  Karim Djemame,et al.  Legal issues in clouds: towards a risk inventory , 2013, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[54]  Karim Djemame,et al.  A Brokering Framework for Assessing Legal Risks in Big Data and the Cloud , 2017, New Technology, Big Data and the Law.

[55]  Robert M. Hunt,et al.  An Empirical Look at Software Patents , 2004 .

[56]  Ian Walden,et al.  Ensuring Competition in the Clouds: The Role of Competition Law? , 2011 .

[57]  Chonho Lee,et al.  A survey of mobile cloud computing: architecture, applications, and approaches , 2013, Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput..

[58]  Agnes Callamard Are courts re-inventing Internet regulation? , 2017 .

[59]  Adam Gatt,et al.  Electronic Commerce - Click-Wrap Agreements: The Enforceability of Click-Wrap Agreements , 2002, Comput. Law Secur. Rev..

[60]  Adam Jacobs,et al.  The pathologies of big data , 2009, Commun. ACM.

[61]  山中 伸一 Computer Associates International,Inc.v.Altai,Inc.,982 F.2d.693(2d Cir.1992)コンピュ-タ・プログラムの著作権侵害は否定したが,営業秘密の不正行為が成立する可能性があるとした事例 , 1996 .

[62]  Jordi Guitart Fernández,et al.  Client classification policies for SLA negotiation and allocation in shared cloud datacenters , 2011 .

[63]  C. Petersen,et al.  Legal and Regulatory Considerations Associated with Use of Patient-Generated Health Data from Social Media and Mobile Health (mHealth) Devices , 2015, Applied Clinical Informatics.

[64]  Primavera De Filippi Law of the cloud: on the supremacy of the user interface over copyright law , 2013 .

[65]  Franz C. Mayer Europe and the Internet: The Old World and the New Medium , 2000 .

[66]  Adolf A. Berle join,et al.  The Theory of Enterprise Entity , 1947 .

[67]  John. Moore,et al.  The firm as a collection of assets , 1992 .

[68]  Frans von der Dunk A European “Equivalent” to United States Export Controls: European Law on the Control of International Trade in Dual-Use Space Technologies , 2009 .

[69]  Noriaki Izumi,et al.  Cloudsourcing: Managing Cloud Adoption , 2011 .

[70]  Dusko Martic REDRESS FOR FREE INTERNET SERVICES UNDER THE SCOPE OF THE EU AND UNCITRAL'S ODR REGULATIONS COMPENSACIONES PARA LOS SERVICIOS DE INTERNET GRATUITOS EN EL MARCO DEL ALCANCE DE LAS REGULACIONES SOBRE ODR DE LA UE Y LA CNUDMI , 2014 .

[71]  Dusko Martic,et al.  Dispute Resolution for Cloud Services: Access to Justice and Fairness in Cloud-Based Low-Value Online Services , 2017 .

[72]  Anne Layne-Farrar,et al.  Defining Software Patents: A Research Field Guide , 2006 .

[73]  Luis Rodero-Merino,et al.  A break in the clouds: towards a cloud definition , 2008, CCRV.

[74]  Pierre Garrouste The new property rights theory of the firm , 2004 .

[75]  G. Bruce Berriman,et al.  On the Use of Cloud Computing for Scientific Workflows , 2008, 2008 IEEE Fourth International Conference on eScience.

[76]  V. Kavitha,et al.  A survey on security issues in service delivery models of cloud computing , 2011, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..

[77]  Vu,et al.  Breathing Space for Cloud-Based Business Models , 2012 .

[78]  Jacob M. Victor The EU General Data Protection Regulation: Toward a Property Regime for Protecting Data Privacy , 2013 .

[79]  Timothy J. Calloway,et al.  Cloud Computing, Clickwrap Agreements, and Limitation on Liability Clauses: A Perfect Storm? , 2012 .

[80]  Katja Weckström Trademarks in New Markets: Simple Infringement or Cause for Evaluation? , 2012 .

[81]  J. Alberto Espinosa,et al.  Big Data: Issues and Challenges Moving Forward , 2013, 2013 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[82]  B. Evans Much Ado About Data Ownership , 2011 .

[83]  Sameer Hinduja,et al.  Correlates of Internet Software Piracy , 2001 .

[84]  Ali M. Al-Khouri,et al.  Data Ownership: Who Owns 'My Data'? , 2012 .

[85]  Henry E. Schaffer,et al.  X as a Service, Cloud Computing, and the Need for Good Judgment , 2009, IT Prof..

[86]  Justine Pila SOFTWARE PATENTS, SEPARATION OF POWERS, AND FAILED SYLLOGISMS: A CORNUCOPIA FROM THE ENLARGED BOARD OF APPEAL OF THE EUROPEAN PATENT OFFICE , 2011, The Cambridge Law Journal.

[87]  Xi He,et al.  Cloud Computing: a Perspective Study , 2010, New Generation Computing.