Error modelling, calibration and analysis of an AM–CW terrestrial laser scanner system

Abstract A rigorous method for terrestrial laser scanner self-calibration using a network of signalised points is presented. Exterior orientation, object point co-ordinates and additional parameters are estimated simultaneously by free network adjustment. Spherical co-ordinate observation equations are augmented with a set of additional parameters that model systematic errors in range, horizontal direction and elevation angle. The error models include both physically interpretable and empirically identified components. Though the focus is on one particular make and model of AM–CW scanner system, the Faro 880, the mathematical models are formulated in a general framework so their application to other instruments only requires selection of an appropriate set of additional parameters. Results from controlled testing show that significant improvement is achieved by using the proposed model in terms of both reducing the magnitude of observational residuals as well as the three-dimensional positioning accuracy of signalised points. Ten self-calibration datasets captured over the course of 13 months are used to examine short- and long-term additional parameter stability via standard hypothesis testing techniques. Detailed investigations into correlation mechanisms between model parameters accompany the self-calibration solution analyses. Other contributions include an observation model for incorporation of integrated inclinometer observations into the self-calibration solution and an effective a priori outlier removal method. The benefit of the former is demonstrated to be reduced correlation between exterior orientation and additional parameters, even if inclinometer precision is low. The latter is arrived at by detailed analysis of the influence of incidence angle on range.

[1]  Yuriy Reshetyuk CALIBRATION OF TERRESTRIAL LASER SCANNERS FOR THE PURPOSES OF GEODETIC ENGINEERING , 2006 .

[2]  Jafar Amiri Parian,et al.  INTEGRATED LASER SCANNER AND INTENSITY IMAGE CALIBRATION AND ACCURACY ASSESSMENT , 2005 .

[3]  Thorsten Schulz,et al.  Terrestrial Laser Scanning - Investigations and Applications for High Precision Scanning , 2004 .

[4]  Martin David Adams Sensor Modelling, Design and Data Processing for Autonomous Navigation , 1999, World Scientific Series in Robotics and Intelligent Systems.

[5]  H. Sternberg,et al.  INVESTIGATIONS INTO THE ACCURACY BEHAVIOUR OF THE TERRESTRIAL LASER SCANNING SYSTEM MENSI GS100 , 2005 .

[6]  Horst A. Beyer,et al.  Calibration modeling and stability testing for the Kodak DC200 series digital still camera , 2000, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.

[7]  Ayman Habib,et al.  Stability Analysis and Geometric Calibration of Off-the-Shelf Digital Cameras , 2005 .

[8]  Hilmar Ingensand,et al.  Metrological Aspects in Terrestrial Laser Scanning Technology , 2008 .

[9]  Hanqi Zhuang,et al.  Modeling Gimbal Axis Misalignments and Mirror Center Offset in a Single-Beam Laser Tracking Measurement System , 1995, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[10]  M. A. R. Cooper Modern theodolites and levels , 1982 .

[11]  Karsten Jacobsen,et al.  Attempt at obtaining the best possible accuracy in bundle block adjustment , 1982 .

[12]  Larry D. Mitchell,et al.  Laser scanning system testing—Errors and improvements , 1995 .

[13]  J. M. Rueger,et al.  Electronic Distance Measurement: An Introduction , 1990 .

[14]  Dirk Langer,et al.  Imaging Ladar for 3-D Surveying and CAD Modeling of Real-World Environments , 2000, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[15]  Psang Dain Lin,et al.  Modeling and sensitivity analysis of laser tracking systems by skew-ray tracing method , 2005 .

[16]  Rui Liu,et al.  Standardization and Visualization of 2.5D Scanning Data and Color Information by Inverse Mapping , 2005 .

[17]  Markus Vincze,et al.  On the calibration of a 6-D laser tracking system for dynamic robot measurements , 1998, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas..

[18]  Cang Ye,et al.  Characterization of a 2D laser scanner for mobile robot obstacle negotiation , 2002, Proceedings 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.02CH37292).

[19]  Derek D. Lichti,et al.  CALIBRATION AND TESTING OF A TERRESTRIAL LASER SCANNER , 2000 .

[20]  Martial Hebert,et al.  3D measurements from imaging laser radars: how good are they? , 1992, Image Vis. Comput..

[21]  J. M. Rüeger,et al.  MULTIPLICITY OF CYCLIC ERRORS IN ELECTRO-OPTICAL DISTANCE METERS , 1982 .

[22]  Wolfgang Boehler,et al.  Investigating Laser Scanner Accuracy , 2005 .

[23]  Hilmar Ingensand,et al.  Influencing Variables, Precision and Accuracy of Terrestrial Laser Scanners , 2004 .

[24]  Andreas Rietdorf,et al.  A Concept for the Calibration of Terrestrial Laser Scanners , 2004 .

[25]  D. Zhong,et al.  Robust estimation and optimal selection of polynomial parameters for the interpolation of GPS geoid heights , 1997 .

[26]  Derek D. Lichti,et al.  EXPERIENCES WITH TERRESTRIAL LASER SCANNER MODELLING AND ACCURACY ASSESSMENT , 2006 .

[27]  Jean M. Rüeger,et al.  Theodolite observations and least squares , 1992 .